skip to main content
10.1145/3240323.3240350acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multistakeholder recommendation with provider constraints

Published:27 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recommender systems are typically designed to optimize the utility of the end user. In many settings, however, the end user is not the only stakeholder and this exclusive focus may produce unsatisfactory results for other stakeholders. One such setting is found in multisided platforms, which bring together buyers and sellers. In such platforms, it may be necessary to jointly optimize the value for both buyers and sellers. This paper proposes a constraint-based integer programming optimization model, in which different sets of constraints are used to reflect the goals of the different stakeholders. This model is applied as a post-processing step, so it can easily be added onto an existing recommendation system to make it multi-stakeholder aware. For computational tractability with larger data sets, we reformulate the integer problem using the Lagrangian dual and use subgradient optimization. In experiments with two data sets, we evaluate empirically the interaction between the utilities of buyers and sellers and show that our approximation can achieve good upper and lower bounds in practical situations.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p54-surer.mp4

mp4

2.1 GB

References

  1. Himan Abdollahpouri, Robin Burke, and Bamshad Mobasher. 2017. Recommender Systems as Multistakeholder Environments. In Proceedings of the 25th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 347--348. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Deepak Agarwal, Bee-Chung Chen, Pradheep Elango, and Xuanhui Wang. 2011. Click Shaping to Optimize Multiple Objectives. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 132--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Deepak Agarwal, Bee-Chung Chen, Pradheep Elango, and Xuanhui Wang. 2012. Personalized Click Shaping Through Lagrangian Duality for Online Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 35th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 485--494. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Leman Akoglu and Christos Faloutsos. 2010. Valuepick: Towards a Value-oriented Dual-goal Recommender System. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, 1151--1158. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Robin Burke and Himan Abdollahpouri. 2017. Patterns of Multistakeholder Recommendation. In VAMS Workshop 2017. arxiv, http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.09258, Article 1, 5 pages. arXiv:1707.09258Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Robin D. Burke, Himan Abdollahpouri, Bamshad Mobasher, and Trinadh Gupta. 2016. Towards Multi-stakeholder Utility Evaluation of Recommender Systems. In UMAP Extended Proceedings, Vol. 1618. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Aachen University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrei Hagiu. 2014. Strategic Decisions for Multisided Platforms. MIT Sloan Management Review 55, 2 (2014), 71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tamas Jambor and Jun Wang. 2010. Optimizing Multiple Objectives in Collaborative Filtering. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '10). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 55--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Luiz Pizzato, Tomek Rej, Thomas Chung, Irena Koprinska, and Judy Kay. 2010. RECON: A Reciprocal Recommender for Online Dating. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 207--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Colin R. Reeves (Ed.). 1993. Modern Heuristic Techniques for Combinatorial Problems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA. 243--303 pages. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=166648.166660 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Marco Tulio Ribeiro, Anisio Lacerda, Adriano Veloso, and Nivio Ziviani. 2012. Pareto-efficient Hybridization for Multi-objective Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '12). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Mario Rodriguez, Christian Posse, and Ethan Zhang. 2012. Multiple Objective Optimization in Recommender Systems. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 11--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    RecSys '18: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    September 2018
    600 pages
    ISBN:9781450359016
    DOI:10.1145/3240323

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 September 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    RecSys '18 Paper Acceptance Rate32of181submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

    Upcoming Conference

    RecSys '24
    18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    October 14 - 18, 2024
    Bari , Italy

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader