skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

Responding to Sensitive Disclosures on Social Media: A Decision-Making Framework

Published:13 December 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

When people disclose information on social media that is sensitive or potentially stigmatized (e.g., mental illness, pregnancy loss), how do others decide to respond? We use interviews and vignettes to provide a response decision-making framework (RDM) that explains factors informing whether and how individuals respond to sensitive disclosures from their social media connections. The RDM framework includes factors related to the self, poster, and disclosure context (i.e., relational, temporal, social). Our findings include how people's decisions are complicated by balancing their own needs (e.g., privacy, wellbeing) as well as the posters’ (e.g., support) when seeing what they consider sensitive posts on social media. We identify empirically grounded insights and information that social media designs could surface to support both potential disclosers and responders. We argue that social media sites should provide privacy controls for both disclosers and responders, and facilitate the visibility of network-level support.

References

  1. Irwin Altman and Dalmas A. Taylor. 1973. Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Holt, Rinehart 8 Winston.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Announcing pregnancy loss on Facebook: A decision-making framework for stigmatized disclosures on identified social network sites. In Proceedings of CHI 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L. Haimson, Munmun Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2018. Social support, reciprocity, and anonymity in responses to sexual abuse disclosures on social media. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25, 5, Article 28 (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L. Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2016. Understanding social media disclosures of sexual abuse through the lenses of support seeking and anonymity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). 3906--3918. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Nazanin Andalibi, Pinar Ozturk, and Andrea Forte. 2017. Sensitive self-disclosures, responses, and social support on Instagram: The case of #depression. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’17). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Richard L. Archer. 1979. Role of personality and the social situation. In Self-disclosure: Origins, Patterns, and Implications of Openness in Interpersonal Relationships, G. J. Chelune (Ed.). Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Azy Barak, Meyran Boniel-Nissim, and John Suler. 2008. Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 5 (2008), 1867--1883. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Azy Barak and Orit Gluck-Ofri. 2007. Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. CyberPsychology 8 Behavior 10, 3 (2007), 407--417.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. P. Barbee and M. R. Cunningham. 1995. An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. Communication Yearbook 18 (1995), 381--413.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Christine Barter and Emma Renold. 2000. “I wanna tell you a story”: Exploring the application of vignettes in qualitative research with children and young people. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3, 4 (2000), 307--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Natalya N. Bazarova. 2012. Contents and contexts: Disclosure perceptions on Facebook. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 369--372. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2145262. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Natalya N. Bazarova. 2012. Public intimacy: Disclosure interpretation and social judgments on Facebook. Journal of Communication 62, 5 (2012), 815--832.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Natalya N. Bazarova, Jessie G. Taft, Yoon Hyung Choi, and Dan Cosley. 2013. Managing impressions and relationships on Facebook: Self-presentational and relational concerns revealed through the analysis of language style. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32, 2 (2013), 121--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Elizabeth R. Beil. 1992. Miscarriage: Women 8 Therapy 12, 1--2 (1992), 161--173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. George A. Bonanno and Stacey Kaltman. 2001. The varieties of grief experience. Clinical Psychology Review 21, 5 (2001), 705--734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn S. Dombrowski, Anita M. Gilbert, Nafiri Kusumakaulika, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2014. Stewarding a legacy: Responsibilities and relationships in the management of post-mortem data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 4157--4166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Moira Burke and Mike Develin. 2016. Once more with feeling: Supportive responses to social sharing on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 1462--1474. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2835199. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Moira Burke and Robert E. Kraut. 2016. The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21, 4 (2016), 265--281. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Marie Louise Caltabiano and Michael Smithson. 1983. Variables affecting the perception of self-disclosure appropriateness. Journal of Social Psychology 120, 1 (1983), 119--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. J. M. Carroll. 2000. Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers 13, 1 (2000), 43--60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Alan L. Chaikin and Valerian J. Derlaga. 1974. Variables affecting the appropriateness of self-disclosure. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 42, 4 (1974), 588--593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Stephenie R. Chaudoir and Jeffrey D. Fisher. 2010. The disclosure processes model: Understanding disclosure decision-making and post-disclosure outcomes among people living with a concealable stigmatized identity. Psychological Bulletin 136, 2 (2010), 236--256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Nancy L. Collins and Lynn Carol Miller. 1994. Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 116, 3 (1994), 457.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Paul C. Cozby. 1973. Self-disclosure: A literature review. Psychological Bulletin 79, 2 (1973), 73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Carolyn E. Cutrona and Daniel W. Russell. 1990. Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In Social Support: An Interactional View, B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, and G. R. Pierce (Eds.). John Wiley 8 Sons, Oxford, England, 319--366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. The benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 4 (2007), 1143--1168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Emma Renold. 2002. Using vignettes in qualitative research. Building Research Capacity 3 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Bo Feng, Siyue Li, and Na Li. 2016. Is a profile worth a thousand words? How online support-seeker's profile features may influence the quality of received support messages. Communication Research 43, 2 (2016), 253--276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Janet Finch. 1987. The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology 21, 1 (1987), 105--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Eric Gilbert and Karrie Karahalios. 2009. Predicting tie strength with social media. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 211--220. Retrieved August 8, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1518736. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Erving Goffman. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday, Garden City, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Rebecca Gray, Nicole B. Ellison, Jessica Vitak, and Cliff Lampe. 2013. Who wants to know?: Question-asking and answering practices among Facebook users. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’13). 1213--1224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kathryn Greene, Valerian J. Derlega, and Alicia Mathews. 2006. Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, A. L. Vangelisti and D. Perlman (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, New York, 409--427.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nir Grinberg, Shankar Kalyanaraman, Lada A. Adamic, and Mor Naaman. 2017. Understanding Feedback Expectations on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’17). 726--739. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Disclosure, stress, and support during gender transition on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW’15). 1176--1190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2016. Digital footprints and changing networks during online identity transitions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’16). 2895--2907. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Keith Hampton, Lauren Sessions Goulet, Lee Rainie, and Kristen Purcell. 2011. Social networking sites and our lives. In Pew Research Center: Internet, Science 8 Tech. Retrieved August 3, 2017 from http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/06/16/social-networking-sites-and-our-lives/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Elaine Hatfield, John T. Cacioppo, and Richard L. Rapson. 1993. Emotional Contagion. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2, 3 (1993), 96--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Rebecca A. Hayes, Caleb T. Carr, and Donghee Yvette Wohn. 2016. One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting 8 Electronic Media 60, 1 (2016), 171--187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Michael Hecht, Tara Shepherd, and M. Joanne Hall. 1979. Multivariate indices of the effects of self‐disclosure. Western Journal of Speech Communication 43, 4 (1979), 235--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Andrew C. High, Anne Oeldorf-Hirsch, and Saraswathi Bellur. 2014. Misery rarely gets company: The influence of emotional bandwidth on supportive communication on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior 34 (2014), 79--88.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Edward E. Jones and Richard L. Archer. 1976. Are there special effects of personalistic self-disclosure? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 12, 2 (1976), 180--193.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Claire E. Karlen and Jennifer R. Daniels. 2011. Cyberostracism and social monitoring: Social anxiety's effects on reactions to exclusion and inclusion online. Honors Projects. Paper 147. http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/psych_honproj/147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Elaine Kasket. 2009. Protocol for responding to participant distress, adapted version for telephone/Skype.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Ryan Kelly, Daniel Gooch, Bhagyashree Patil, and Leon Watts. 2017. Demanding by design: Supporting effortful communication practices in close personal relationships. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’17). 70--83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Funda Kivran-Swaine, Jeremy Ting, Jed R. Brubaker, Rannie Teodoro, and Mor Naaman. 2014. Understanding Loneliness in Social Awareness Streams: Expressions and Responses. In Proceedings of the Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, 24 (2014), 8788--8790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Cliff Lampe, Rebecca Gray, Andrew T. Fiore, and Nicole Ellison. 2014. Help is on the way: Patterns of responses to resource requests on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW’14). 3--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Li Li, Li-Jung Liang, Chunqing Lin, Zunyou Wu, and Yi Wen. 2009. Individual attitudes and perceived social norms: Reports on HIV/AIDS-related stigma among service providers in China. International Journal of Psychology 44, 6 (2009), 443--450.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Siyue Li and Bo Feng. 2015. What to say to an online support-seeker? The influence of others’ responses and support-seekers’ replies: Online support provision. Human Communication Research 41, 3 (2015), 303--326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Ruoyun Lin and Sonja Utz. 2017. Self-disclosure on SNS: Do disclosure intimacy and narrativity influence interpersonal closeness and social attraction? Computers in Human Behavior 70 (2017), 426--436. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Eden Litt. 2012. Knock, knock. who's there? The imagined audience. Journal of Broadcasting 8 Electronic Media 56, 3 (2012), 330--345.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Mimi Luebbermann. 1994. Coping with Miscarriage: A Simple, Reassuring Guide to Emotional and Physical Healing. Prima Lifestyles, Rocklin, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Kate Magsamen-Conrad. 2014. Dimensions of anticipated reaction in information management: Anticipating responses and outcomes. Review of Communication 14, 3--4 (2014), 314--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Sumaira H. Malik and Neil S. Coulson. 2013. Coming to terms with permanent involuntary childlessness: A phenomenological analysis of bulletin board postings. Europe's Journal of Psychology 9, 1 (2013), 77--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Alice E. Marwick and Danah Boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media and Society 13, 1 (2011), 114--133.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Miller McPherson, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27, 1 (2001), 415--444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Miriam J. Metzger, Andrew J. Flanagin, and Ryan B. Medders. 2010. Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. Journal of Communication 60, 3 (2010), 413--439.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Lynn Carol Miller, Linda Lee Cooke, Jennifer Tsang, and Faith Morgan. 1992. Should I brag? Nature and impact of positive and boastful disclosures for women and men. Human Communication Research 18, 3 (1992), 364--399.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Christine Moulder. 1994. Towards a preliminary framework for understanding pregnancy loss. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 12, 1 (1994), 65--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Megan Oaten, Richard J. Stevenson, and Trevor I. Case. 2011. Disease avoidance as a functional basis for stigmatization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 366, 1583 (2011), 3433--3452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Julia Omarzu. 2000. A disclosure decision model: Determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4, 2 (2000), 174--185.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Amy C. Orben and Robin I. M. Dunbar. 2017. Social media and relationship development: The effect of valence and intimacy of posts. Computers in Human Behavior 73 (2017), 489--498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. James W. Pennebaker and Kent D. Harber. 1993. A social stage model of collective coping: The Loma Prieta earthquake and the Persian Gulf war. Journal of Social Issues 49, 4 (1993), 125--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Nalia Rahman. 1996. Caregivers’ Sensitivity to Conflict. Journal of Elder Abuse 8 Neglect 8, 1 (1996), 35--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Stephen A. Rains and Steven R. Brunner. 2018. The outcomes of broadcasting self-disclosure using new communication technologies: Responses to disclosure vary across one's social network. Communication Research 45, 5 (2018), 659--687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. K. S. Reed. 1992. The effects of gestational age and pregnancy planning status on obstetrical nurses’ perceptions of giving emotional care to women experiencing miscarriage. Image--the Journal of Nursing Scholarship 24, 2 (1992), 107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Leonard Reinecke and Sabine Trepte. 2014. Authenticity and well-being on social network sites: A two-wave longitudinal study on the effects of online authenticity and the positivity bias in SNS communication. Computers in Human Behavior 30 (2014), 95--102. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Catherine Hackett Renner, Sophia Verdekal, Sigal Brier, and Gina Fallucca. 2000. The meaning of miscarriage to others: Is it an unrecognized loss? Journal of Personal and lnterpersonal Loss 5 (2000), 65--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Rhidian Hughes. 1998. Considering the vignette technique and its application to a study of drug injecting and HIV risk and safer behaviour. Sociology of Health and Illness 20, 3 (1998), 381--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Bernard Rimé. 2009. Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: Theory and empirical review. Emotion Review 1, 1 (2009), 60--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Sabirat Rubya and Svetlana Yarosh. 2017. Video-mediated peer support in an online community for recovery from substance use disorders. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’17). 1454--1469. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Ferdinand Schoeman. 1984. Privacy: Philosophical dimensions. American Philosophical Quarterly 21, 3 (1984), 199--213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Lauren Scissors, Moira Burke, and Steven Wengrovitz. 2016. What's in a like?: Attitudes and behaviors around receiving likes on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW’16). 1501--1510. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  75. Constance Hoenk Shapiro. 1993. When Part of the Self is Lost: Helping Clients Heal after Sexual and Reproductive Losses. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Roxane Cohen Silver, Camille B. Wortman, and Christine Crofton. 1990. The role of coping in support provision: The self-presentational dilemma of victims of life crises. In Social Support: An Interactional View, B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, and G. R. Pierce (Eds.). John Wiley 8 Sons, Oxford, England, 397--426.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Rachel E. Silverman and Jay Baglia. 2015. Communicating Pregnancy Loss: Narrative as a Method for Change. Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Jack M. Stack. 1984. The psychodynamics of spontaneous abortion. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 54, 1 (1984), 162--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Michael A. Stefanone, Kyounghee Hazel Kwon, and Derek Lackaff. 2012. Exploring the relationship between perceptions of social capital and enacted support online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17, 4 (2012), 451--466. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  80. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. John Suler. 2004. The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology 8 Behavior : The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society 7, 3 (2004), 321--326.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Martin Tanis. 2008. Health-related on-line forums: What's the big attraction? Journal of Health Communication 13, 7 (2008), 698--714.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Tawfiq Ammari, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Sarita Yardi Schoenebeck. 2014. Accessing social support and overcoming judgment on social media among parents of children with special needs. In Proceedings of ICWSM. Retrieved June 1, 2016 from http://research-srv.microsoft.com/pubs/210198/ammari_ICWSM2014.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Facebook Data Team. 2010. What's on Your Mind? Retrieved November 14, 2014 from https://www.facebook.com/notes/facebook-data-team/whats-on-yourmind/477517358858.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. Stephanie J. Tobin, Eric J. Vanman, Marnize Verreynne, and Alexander K. Saeri. 2014. Threats to belonging on Facebook: Lurking and ostracism. Social Influence 10, 1 (2015), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. S. S. Tomkins. 1978. Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 26 (1978), 201--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. Sabine Trepte, Tobias Dienlin, and Leonard Reinecke. 2014. Influence of social support received in online and offline contexts on satisfaction with social support and satisfaction with life: A longitudinal study. Media Psychology 18, 1 (2014), 1--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Jessica Vitak. 2012. The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting 8 Electronic Media 56, 4 (2012), 451--470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. Jessica Vitak, Nicole B. Ellison, and Charles Steinfield. 2011. The ties that bond: Re-examining the relationship between Facebook use and bonding social capital. In Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’11). 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Jessica Vitak and Jinyoung Kim. 2014. “You can't block people offline”: Examining how Facebook's affordances shape the disclosure process. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing. 461--474. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Yi-Chia Wang, Moira Burke, and Robert Kraut. 2016. Modeling self-disclosure in social networking sites. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 8 Social Computing (CSCW’16). 74--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  92. Yi-Chia Wang, Robert E. Kraut, and John M. Levine. 2015. Eliciting and receiving online support: Using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support. J. Med. Internet Res. 17, 4 (2015), e99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. Yi-Chia Wang, Robert Kraut, and John M. Levine. 2012. To stay or leave?: The relationship of emotional and informational support to commitment in online health support groups. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW’12). 833--842. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  94. Camille B. Wortman and Darrin R. Lehman. 1985. Reactions to victims of life crises: Support attempts that fail. In Social Support: Theory, Research and Applications. Springer, 463--489.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Kevin B. Wright and Sally B. Bell. 2003. Health-related support groups on the internet: Linking empirical findings to social support and computer-mediated communication theory. Journal of Health Psychology 8, 1 (2003), 39--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  96. Marc Ziegele and Leonard Reinecke. 2017. No place for negative emotions? The effects of message valence, communication channel, and social distance on users’ willingness to respond to SNS status updates. Computers in Human Behavior 75 (2017), 704--713. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  97. Teacher Self-Disclosure: Amount, Relevance, and Negativity: Communication Quarterly: Vol 56, No 3. Retrieved August 8, 2017 from.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Responding to Sensitive Disclosures on Social Media: A Decision-Making Framework

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
            ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 25, Issue 6
            December 2018
            236 pages
            ISSN:1073-0516
            EISSN:1557-7325
            DOI:10.1145/3300063
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2018 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 December 2018
            • Accepted: 1 July 2018
            • Revised: 1 June 2018
            • Received: 1 November 2017
            Published in tochi Volume 25, Issue 6

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader