ABSTRACT
Players are increasingly viewing games as a social medium to form and enact friendships; however, we currently have little empirically-informed understanding of how to design games that satisfy the social needs of players. We investigate how in-game friendships develop, and how they affect well-being. We deployed an online survey (N= 234) measuring the properties of games and social capital that participants experience within their gaming community, alongside indicators of the social aspects of their psychological wellbeing (loneliness, need satisfaction of relatedness). First, our findings highlight two strong predictors of in-game social capital: interdependence and toxicity, whereas cooperation appears to be less crucial than common wisdom suggests. Second, we demonstrate how in-game social capital is associated with reduced feelings of loneliness and increased satisfaction of relatedness. Our findings suggest that social capital in games is strongly and positively related to players' psychological well-being. The present study informs both the design of social games as well as our theoretical understanding of in-game relationships.
- Craig A Anderson, William E Deuser, and Kristina M DeNeve. 1995. Hot temperatures, hostile affect, hostile cognition, and arousal: Tests of a general model of affective aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21, 5: 434--448.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roy F. Baumeister and Mark R. Leary. 1995. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117, 3: 497--529.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anthony M Bean, Espen Aarseth, Huub Boonen, Michelle Colder Carras, Mark Coulson, Dimitri Das, Jory Deleuze, Elza Dunkels, Johan Edman, Christopher J Ferguson, Maria C. Haagsma, Karin Helmersson Bergmark, Zaheer Hussain, Jeroen Jansz, Daniel Kardefelt-Winther, Lawrence Kutner, Patrick Markey, Rune Kristian Lundedal Nielsen, Nicole Prause, Andrew Przybylski, Thorsten Quandt, Adriano Schimmenti, Vladan Starcevic, Gabrielle Stutman, Jan Van Looy, and Antonius J. Van Rooij. 2017. Scholars' open debate paper on the World Health Organization ICD-11 Gaming Disorder proposal. Journal of Behavioral Addictions 6, 3: 267--270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anastasiia Beznosyk, Peter Quax, Wim Lamotte, and Karin Coninx. 2012. The effect of closely-coupled interaction on player experience in casual games. In International Conference on Entertainment Computing, 243--255. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Max V Birk, Benjamin Buttlar, Jason T Bowey, Susanne Poeller, Shelby C Thomson, Nicola Baumann, and Regan L Mandryk. 2016. The Effects of Social Exclusion on Play Experience and Hostile Cognitions in Digital Games. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3007--3019. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jeremy Blackburn and Haewoon Kwak. 2014. STFU NOOB! Predicting Crowdsourced Decisions on Toxic Behavior in Online Games. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jason T Bowey, Ansgar E Depping, and Regan L Mandryk. 2017. Don't Talk Dirty to Me: How Sexist Beliefs Affect Experience in Sexist Games. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1530--1543. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael A Campion, Gina J Medsker, and A Catherine Higgs. 1993. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel psychology 46, 4: 823--847.Google Scholar
- Krista Casler, Lydia Bickel, and Elizabeth Hackett. 2013. Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior 29, 6: 2156--2160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob Cohen. 1968. Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological bulletin 70, 4: 213.Google Scholar
- Helena Cole and Mark D Griffiths. 2007. Social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing gamers. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 4: 575--583.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amanda C. Cote. 2017. "I Can Defend Myself": Women's Strategies for Coping with Harassment while Gaming Online. Games and Culture 12, 2: 136--155.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Laura A Dabbish. 2008. Jumpstarting relationships with online games: evidence from a laboratory investigation. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 353--356. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2000. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry 11, 4: 227--268.Google Scholar
- Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2000. The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry 11, 4: 227--268.Google Scholar
- A.E. Depping, R.L. Mandryk, C. Johanson, J.T. Bowey, and S.C. Thomson. 2016. Trust me: Social games are better than social icebreakers at building trust. In CHI PLAY 2016 - Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ansgar E. Depping and Regan L Mandryk. 2017. Cooperation and Interdependence: How Multiplayer Games Increase Social Closeness. In CHI PLAY 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ansgar E Depping and Regan L Mandryk. 2017. Cooperation and Interdependence: How Multiplayer Games Increase Social Closeness. In CHI PLAY 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emese Domahidi, Ruth Festl, and Thorsten Quandt. 2014. To dwell among gamers: Investigating the relationship between social online game use and gaming-related friendships. Computers in Human Behavior 35: 107--115.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicolas Ducheneaut, Nicholas Yee, Eric Nickell, and Robert J Moore. 2006. "Alone Together?" Exploring the Social Dynamics of Massively Multiplayer Online Games. Chi 2006, March: 407--416. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jason B Ellis, Kurt Luther, Katherine Bessiere, and Wendy A Kellogg. 2008. Games for virtual team building. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Designing interactive systems, 295--304. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Entertainment Software Association. 2016. Essential facts 2017. ESA Report 2017 2016: 1--3. Retrieved from http://www.theesa.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/EF2017_FinalDigital.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Will Felps, Terence R Mitchell, and Eliza Byington. 2006. How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Research in organizational behavior 27: 175--222.Google Scholar
- Christopher J Ferguson. 2009. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 40, 5: 532.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cy Foo and Emi Koivisto. 2004. Defining grief play in MMORPGs: Player and developer perceptions. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology: 245--250. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maria Frostling-Henningsson. 2009. First-person shooter games as a way of connecting to people:"Brothers in blood." CyberPsychology & Behavior 12, 5: 557--562.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard Goldstein. 1993. Conditioning diagnostics: Collinearity and weak data in regression.Google Scholar
- Frederik De Grove, Verolien Cauberghe, and Jan Van Looy. 2016. Development and validation of an instrument for measuring individual motives for playing digital games. Media Psychology 19, 1: 101--125.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S.M. M Grüsser, R. Thalemann, and M.D. D Griffiths. 2007. Excessive Computer Game Playing: Evidence for Addiction and Aggression? CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 2: 290--292.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Harris, Mark Hancock, and Stacey Scott. 2014. Beam Me'Round, Scotty!: Exploring the effect of interdependence in asymmetric cooperative games. In Proceedings of the first ACM SIGCHI annual symposium on Computer-human interaction in play, 417--418. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Harris, Mark Hancock, and Stacey D Scott. 2015. Beam Me'Round, Scotty!: Studying Asymmetry and Interdependence in a Prototype Cooperative Game. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 775--778. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Harris, Mark Hancock, and Stacey D Scott. 2016. Leveraging Asymmetries in Multiplayer Games: Investigating Design Elements of Interdependent Play. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 350--361. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li-Tze Hu and Peter M Bentler. 1995. Evaluating model fit.Google Scholar
- Isto Huvila, Kim Holmberg, Stefan Ek, and Gunilla Widén-Wulff. 2010. Social capital in second life. Online Information Review 34, 2: 295--316.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeroen Jansz and Lonneke Martens. 2005. Gaming at a LAN event: the social context of playing video games. New media & society 7, 3: 333--355.Google Scholar
- Jeroen Jansz and Martin Tanis. 2007. Appeal of playing online first person shooter games. CyberPsychology & Behavior 10, 1: 133--136.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Colby Johanson and Regan L Mandryk. 2016. Scaffolding player location awareness through audio cues in first-person shooters. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3450--3461. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David W Johnson and Roger T Johnson. 1989. Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.Google Scholar
- David W Johnson and Roger T Johnson. 2008. Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning: The teacher's role. The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom: 9--37.Google Scholar
- Joseph Kahne, Ellen Middaugh, and Chris Evans. 2008. The Civic Potential of Video Games. Group: 53. Retrieved from www.digitallearning.macfound.orgGoogle Scholar
- Rachel Kowert, Emese Domahidi, Ruth Festl, and Thorsten Quandt. 2014. Social gaming, lonely life? The impact of digital game play on adolescents' social circles. Computers in human behavior 36: 385--390. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rachel Kowert, Ruth Festl, and Thorsten Quandt. 2014. Unpopular, overweight, and socially inept: Reconsidering the stereotype of online gamers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 17, 3: 141--146.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rachel Kowert and Julian A Oldmeadow. 2015. Playing for social comfort: Online video game play as a social accommodator for the insecurely attached. Computers in human behavior 53: 556--566. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Kraut, Michael Patterson, Vicki Lundmark, Sara Kiesler, Tridas Mukophadhyay, and William Scherlis. 1998. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American psychologist 53, 9: 1017.Google Scholar
- Birgul Kutlu, Aysun Bozanta, and Nuket Nowlan. 2013. Multi-User Virtual Environments and Serious Games for Team Building in Organizations. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on E-Learning in the Workplace (ICELW 2013). New York, USA.Google Scholar
- Haewoon Kwak, Jeremy Blackburn, and Seungyeop Han. 2015. Exploring Cyberbullying and Other Toxic Behavior in Team Competition Online Games. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sheena Lewis, Jason B Ellis, and Wendy A Kellogg. 2010. Using virtual interactions to explore leadership and collaboration in globally distributed teams. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Intercultural collaboration, 9--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Regan Lee Mandryk and Max Valentin Birk. 2017. Toward Game-Based Digital Mental Health Interventions: Player Habits and Preferences. Journal of medical Internet research 19, 4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Winter Mason and Siddharth Suri. 2012. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior research methods 44, 1: 1--23.Google Scholar
- Logan Molyneux, Krishnan Vasudevan, and Homero Gil de Zúñiga. 2015. Gaming Social Capital: Exploring Civic Value in Multiplayer Video Games. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20, 4: 381--399. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frederick P Morgeson and Stephen E Humphrey. 2006. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of applied psychology 91, 6: 1321.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maaz Nasir, Kelly Lyons, Rock Leung, and Ali Moradian. 2013. Cooperative games and their effect on group collaboration. In International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems, 502--510. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristel M De Nobrega and Anne-F Rutkowski. 2012. Fostering group collaboration in virtual worlds. In System Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on, 983--992. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gabriele Paolacci and Jesse Chandler. 2014. Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science 23, 3: 184--188.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alex Pham. 2002. Online bullies give grief to gamers. Los Angeles Times.Google Scholar
- Patricia Pizer. 2003. Social game systems: cultivating player socialization and providing alternate routes to game rewards. Massively multiplayer game development: 427--441.Google Scholar
- Robert D Putnam. 2001. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Riot Games Support. 2017. Reporting a Player. Retrieved September 13, 2017 from https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752884-Reporting-a-PlayerGoogle Scholar
- José Bernardo Rocha, Samuel Mascarenhas, and Rui Prada. 2008. Game mechanics for cooperative games. ZON Digital Games 2008: 72--80.Google Scholar
- Dan Russell, Letitia A. Peplau, and Carolyn E. Cutrona. 1980. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 3: 472--480.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American psychologist 55, 1: 68.Google Scholar
- Diane J. Schiano, Bonnie Nardi, Thomas Debeauvais, Nicolas Ducheneaut, and Nicholas Yee. 2014. The "lonely gamer" revisited. Entertainment Computing 5, 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Magy Seif El-Nasr, Bardia Aghabeigi, David Milam, Mona Erfani, Beth Lameman, Hamid Maygoli, and Sang Mah. 2010. Understanding and evaluating cooperative games. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 253--262. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kennon M. Sheldon and Christopher P. Niemiec. 2006. It's not just the amount that counts: Balanced need satisfaction also affects well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91, 2: 331--341.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cuihua Shen and Dmitri Williams. 2011. Unpacking time online: Connecting internet and massively multiplayer online game use with psychosocial well-being. Communication Research 38, 1: 123--149.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Constance A Steinkuehler and Dmitri Williams. 2006. Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as "third places." Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 4: 885--909.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sabine Trepte, Leonard Reinecke, and Keno Juechems. 2012. The social side of gaming: How playing online computer games creates online and offline social support. Computers in Human Behavior 28, 3: 832--839. Google ScholarDigital Library
- April Tyack, Peta Wyeth, and Daniel Johnson. 2016. The appeal of MOBA games: What makes people start, stay, and stop. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 313--325. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kellie Vella and Daniel Johnson. 2015. Playing Alone , Playing With Others: Differences in Player Experience and Indicators of Wellbeing. CHI PLAY '15 Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play: 3--12. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dmitri Williams. 2006. Groups and goblins: The social and civic impact of an online game. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 50, 4: 651--670.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dmitri Williams. 2006. On and Off the 'Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 2: 593--628.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dmitri Williams, Nicolas Ducheneaut, Li Xiong, Yuanyuan Zhang, Nick Yee, and Eric Nickell. 2006. From tree house to barracks: The social life of guilds in World of Warcraft. Games and culture 1, 4: 338--361.Google Scholar
- Dmitri Williams, Nicolas Ducheneaut, Li Xiong, Yuanyuan Zhang, Nick Yee, and Eric Nickell. 2006. From Tree House to Barracks. Games and Culture 1, 4: 338--361.Google ScholarCross Ref
- World Health Organization. 2018. Gaming disorder. Retrieved April 12, 2018 from http://www.who.int/features/qa/gaming-disorder/en/Google Scholar
- Shu Ching Yang. 2012. Paths to Bullying in Online Gaming: The Effects of Gender, Preference for Playing Violent Games, Hostility, and Aggressive Behavior on Bullying. Journal of Educational Computing Research 47, 3: 235--249.Google ScholarCross Ref
- José P Zagal, Jochen Rick, and Idris Hsi. 2006. Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games. Simulation & Gaming 37, 1: 24--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhi-Jin Zhong. 2011. The effects of collective MMORPG (Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games) play on gamers' online and offline social capital. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 6: 2352--2363. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Designing for Friendship: Modeling Properties of Play, In-Game Social Capital, and Psychological Well-being
Recommendations
Online-only friends, real-life friends or strangers? Differential associations with passion and social capital in video game play
The present study tests a recently proposed model in which social video game play supports wellbeing by contributing to a harmonious type of engagement with the game. Players (N=2030) of the online-only multiplayer first-person shooter game, Destiny, ...
The many faces of sociability and social play in games
MindTrek '09: Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous EraIn the past, social interaction has been discussed mostly in the context of multiplayer games, ignoring the implicit forms of sociability in single player games. This paper distinguishes between the sociability around the playing of a game and the ...
Connecting activities on Social Network Sites and life satisfaction: A comparison of older and younger users
AbstractSocial Network Sites (SNSs) have been found to promote psychological well-being of individuals through bonding and bridging social capital by allowing users to engage in different networking activities with their close and weak ties. ...
Highlights- This study is one of the first to use behavioral data in examining older population's SNS use and well-being.
Comments