Infusing computational thinking into middle grade science classrooms: lessons learned

ABSTRACT

There is a growing need to present all students with an opportunity to learn computer science and computational thinking (CT) skills during their primary and secondary education. Traditionally, these opportunities are available outside of the core curriculum as stand-alone courses often taken by those with preparatory privilege. Researchers have identified the need to integrate CT into core classes to provide equitable access to these critical skills. We have worked in a research-practice partnership with two magnet middle schools focused on digital sciences to develop and implement computational thinking into life sciences classes. In this report, we present initial lessons learned while conducting our design-based implementation research on integrating computational thinking into middle school science classes. These case studies suggest that several factors including teacher engagement, teacher attitudes, student prior experience with CS/CT, and curriculum design can all impact student engagement in integrated science-CT lessons.

References

1. Bernd Meyer Aidan Lane and Jonathan Mullins. 2012. Simulation with Cellular A Project Based Introduction to Programming (first ed.). Monash University. Online: https://github.com/MonashAlexandria/snapapps.
2. Tim Bell, Jason Alexander, Isaac Freeman, and Mick Grimley. 2009. Computer science unplugged: School students doing real computing without computers. The New Zealand Journal of Applied Computing and Information Technology 13, 1 (2009), 20--29.
3. Brian Broll, Akos Lédeczi, Peter Volgyesi, Janos Sallai, Miklos Maroti, Alexia Carrillo, Stephanie L Weeden-Wright, Chris Vanags, Joshua D Swartz, and Melvin Lu. 2017. A visual programming environment for learning distributed programming. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 81--86.
4. Philip S. Buffum, Megan Hardy Frankosky, Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, Eric N Wiebe, Bradford W Mott, and James C Lester. 2016. Empowering All Students: Closing the CS Confidence Gap with an In-School Initiative for Middle School Students. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. ACM, 382--387.
5. Philip S. Buffum, Allison G Martinez-Arocho, Megan Hardy Frankosky, Fernando J Rodriguez, Eric N Wiebe, and Kristy Elizabeth Boyer. 2014. CS principles goes to middle school: learning how to teach Big Data. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 151--156.
6. Veronica Cateté, Kathleen Wassell, and Tiffany Barnes. 2014. Use and development of entertainment technologies in after school STEM program. In Proc. of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 163--168.
7. CE Coburn, WR Penuel, and K Geil. 2013. Research-practice partnerships at the district level: A new strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement. Berkeley, CA and Boulder, CO: Univ. of California and Univ. of Colorado (2013).
8. K-12 Computer Science Framework Steering Committee et al. 2016. K-12 computer science framework. (2016).
9. The Concord Consortium. 2014. Common online data analysis platform. @Concord 18, 1 (apr 2014), 16.
10. National Research Council et al. 2011. Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. National Academies Press.
11. Jan Cuny, Larry Snyder, and M Jeannette. 2010. Wing. Demystifying Computational Thinking for Non-Computer Scientists, work in progress (2010).
12. Jill Denner, Linda Werner, and Eloy Ortiz. 2012. Computer games created by middle school girls: Can they be used to measure understanding of computer science concepts? Computers & Education 58, 1 (2012), 240--249.
13. Google (Firm) Gallup (Firm). 2016. Diversity gaps in computer science: exploring the underrepresentation of girls, Blacks and Hispanics. (2016).
14. Dan Garcia, Brian Harvey, and Tiffany Barnes. 2015. The beauty and joy of computing. ACM Inroads 6, 4 (2015), 71--79.
15. Joanna Goode, Jane Margolis, and Gail Chapman. 2014. Curriculum is not enough: The educational theory and research foundation of the exploring computer science professional development model. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 493--498.
16. Shuchi Grover and Roy Pea. 2013. Computational thinking in K-12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher 42, 1 (2013), 38--43.
17. Shuchi Grover, Roy Pea, and Stephen Cooper. 2016. Factors influencing computer science learning in middle school. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on computing science education. ACM, 552--557.
18. Mark Guzdial. 1994. Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interactive Learning Environments 4, 1 (1994), 001--044.
19. Mark Guzdial and Barbara Ericson. 2012. Listening to linked lists: Using multimedia to learn data structures. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM technical symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, 663--663.
20. Peter B Henderson, Thomas J Cortina, and Jeannette M Wing. 2007. Computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39, 1 (2007), 195--196.
21. I Lee. 2016. Reclaiming the roots of CT. CSTA Voice: The Voice of KâĂŞ12 Computer Science Education and Its Educators 12, 1 (mar 2016), 3--4.
22. Irene Lee, Fred Martin, and Katie Apone. 2014. Integrating computational thinking across the K-8 curriculum. Acm Inroads 5, 4 (2014), 64--71.
23. Jane Margolis. 2010. Stuck in the shallow end: Education, race, and computing. MIT Press.
24. Thomas W Price, Jennifer Albert, Veronica Catete, and Tiffany Barnes. 2015. BJC in action: Comparison of student perceptions of a computer science principles course. In Research in Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), 2015. IEEE, 1--4.
25. Thomas W Price, Veronica Cateté, Jennifer Albert, Tiffany Barnes, and Daniel D Garcia. 2016. Lessons Learned from BJC CS Principles Professional Development. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. ACM, 467--472.
26. Susan H Rodger, Jenna Hayes, Gaetjens Lezin, Henry Qin, Deborah Nelson, Ruth Tucker, Mercedes Lopez, Stephen Cooper, Wanda Dann, and Don Slater. 2009. Engaging middle school teachers and students with alice in a diverse set of subjects. In ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, Vol. 41. ACM, 271--275.
27. Cary Sneider, Chris Stephenson, Bruce Schafer, and Larry Flick. 2014. Computational thinking in high school science classrooms. The Science Teacher 81, 5 (2014), 53.
28. Jennifer Tsan, Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, and Collin F Lynch. 2016. How Early Does the CS Gender Gap Emerge?: A Study of Collaborative Problem Solving in 5th Grade Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM technical symposium on computing science education. ACM, 388--393.
29. David Weintrop, Elham Beheshti, Michael Horn, Kai Orton, Kemi Jona, Laura Trouille, and Uri Wilensky. 2014. Defining computational thinking for science, technology, engineering, and math. In American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
30. David Weintrop and Uri Wilensky. 2015. To block or not to block, that is the question: students' perceptions of blocks-based programming. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. ACM, 199--208.
31. Linda Werner, Jill Denner, Shannon Campe, Eloy Ortiz, Dawn DeLay, Amy C Hartl, and Brett Laursen. 2013. Pair programming for middle school students: does friendship influence academic outcomes?. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. ACM, 421--426.
32. Uri Wilensky and Kenneth Reisman. 2006. Thinking like a wolf, a sheep, or a firefly: Learning biology through constructing and testing computational theoriesan embodied modeling approach. Cognition and instruction 24, 2 (2006), 171--209.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computational thinking

      • K-12 education