skip to main content
10.1145/3269206.3269220acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring Diversified Similarity with Kundaha

Published:17 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Exploring large medical image sets by means of traditional similarity query criteria (e.g., neighborhood) can be fruitless if retrieved images are too similar among themselves. This demonstration introduces Kundaha, an exploration tool that assists experts in retrieving and navigating on results from a diversified similarity perspective of user-posed queries. Its implementation includes a wide set of metrics, descriptors, and indexes for enhancing query execution. Users can combine such features with diversified similarity criteria for the organized exploration of result sets and also employ relevance feedback cycles for finding new query-based viewpoints.

References

  1. Ting Deng and Wenfei Fan. 2014. On the Complexity of Query Result Diversification. TODS, Vol. 39, 2, Article 15 (2014), 46 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Thomas M. Deserno, Sameer Antani, and Rodney Long. 2009. Ontology of Gaps in Content-Based Image Retrieval. J. Digital Imaging, Vol. 22, 2 (April 2009), 202--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Marina Drosou, H. V. Jagadish, Evaggelia Pitoura, and Julia Stoyanovich. 2017. Diversity in Big Data: A Review. Big Data, Vol. 5, 2 (June 2017), 73--84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Marina Drosou and Evaggelia Pitoura. 2015. Multiple Radii DisC Diversity: Result Diversification Based on Dissimilarity and Coverage. TODS, Vol. 40, 1, Article 4 (March 2015), 43 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Sha Hu, Zhicheng Dou, Xiaojie Wang, Tetsuya Sakai, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2015. Search Result Diversification Based on Hierarchical Intents. In CIKM. ACM, 63--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lucio F. D. Santos, Willian D. Oliveira, Monica Ferreira, Agma J. M. Traina, and Caetano Traina Jr. 2013. Parameter-free and Domain-independent Similarity Search with Diversity. In SSDBM. IEEE, Article 5, 12 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Marcos R. Vieira, H. L. Razente, M. C. N. Barioni, M. Hadjieleftheriou, D. Srivastava, C. Traina Jr., and V. J. Tsotras. 2011. On query result diversification. In ICDE. ACM, 1163--1174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hamed Zamani, Javid Dadashkarimi, Azadeh Shakery, and W. Bruce Croft. 2016. Pseudo-Relevance Feedback Based on Matrix Factorization. In CIKM. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1483--1492. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Pavel Zezula, Giuseppe Amato, Vlastislav Dohnal, and Michal Batko. 2010. Similarity Search: The Metric Space Approach (1st ed.) Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kaiping Zheng, Hongzhi Wang, Zhixin Qi, Jianzhong Li, and Hong Gao. 2017. A survey of query result diversification. Knowledge and Information Systems, Vol. 51, 1 (2017), 1--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '18: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
    October 2018
    2362 pages
    ISBN:9781450360142
    DOI:10.1145/3269206

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 17 October 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    CIKM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate147of826submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader