skip to main content
10.1145/3269206.3271738acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Bridge": Enhanced Signed Directed Network Embedding

Published:17 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Signed directed networks with positive or negative links convey rich information such as like or dislike, trust or distrust. Existing work of sign prediction mainly focuses on triangles (triadic nodes) motivated by balance theory to predict positive and negative links. However, real-world signed directed networks can contain a good number of "bridge'' edges which, by definition, are not included in any triangles. Such edges are ignored in previous work, but may play an important role in signed directed network analysis.%Such edges serve as fundamental building blocks and may play an important role in signed network analysis.

In this paper, we investigate the problem of learning representations for signed directed networks. We present a novel deep learning approach to incorporating two social-psychologic theories, balance and status theories, to model both triangles and "bridge'' edges in a complementary manner. The proposed framework learns effective embeddings for nodes and edges which can be applied to diverse tasks such as sign prediction and node ranking. Experimental results on three real-world datasets of signed directed social networks verify the essential role of "bridge" edges in signed directed network analysis by achieving the state-of-the-art performance.

References

  1. Smriti Bhagat, Graham Cormode, and S Muthukrishnan. 2011. Node classification in social networks. In Social network data analytics . Springer, 115--148.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Léon Bottou. 1991. Stochastic gradient learning in neural networks. Proc. of Neuro-Nimes , Vol. 91, 8 (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page. 2012. Reprint of: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer networks , Vol. 56, 18 (2012), 3825--3833. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Aditya Grover and Jure Leskovec. 2016. node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networks. In Proc. of SIGKDD. 855--864. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Ramanthan Guha, Ravi Kumar, Prabhakar Raghavan, and Andrew Tomkins. 2004. Propagation of trust and distrust. In Proc. of WWW. ACM, 403--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Fritz Heider. 1946. Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of psychology , Vol. 21, 1 (1946), 107--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mohammad Raihanul Islam, B Aditya Prakash, and Naren Ramakrishnan. 2018. Distributed Representation of Signed Networks. In Accepted by PAKDD .Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jinhong Jung, Woojeong Jin, Lee Sael, and U Kang. 2016. Personalized ranking in signed networks using signed random walk with restart. In Proc. of ICDM. IEEE, 973--978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cristobald de Kerchove and Paul Van Dooren. 2008. The pagetrust algorithm: How to rank web pages when negative links are allowed?. In Proc. of SDM . SIAM, 346--352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Junghwan Kim, Haekyu Park, Ji-Eun Lee, and U Kang. 2018. SIDE: Representation Learning in Signed Directed Networks. In Proc. of WWW. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 509--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. 2016. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.02907 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Jon M Kleinberg. 1999. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. JACM , Vol. 46, 5 (1999), 604--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, and Jon Kleinberg. 2010a. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. In Proc. of WWW. ACM, 641--650. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jure Leskovec, Daniel Huttenlocher, and Jon Kleinberg. 2010b. Signed networks in social media. In Proc. of SIGCHI. ACM, 1361--1370. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. David Liben-Nowell and Jon Kleinberg. 2007. The link-prediction problem for social networks. JASIST , Vol. 58, 7 (2007), 1019--1031. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Symeon Papadopoulos, Yiannis Kompatsiaris, Athena Vakali, and Ploutarchos Spyridonos. 2012. Community detection in social media. DMKD , Vol. 24, 3 (2012), 515--554. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Bryan Perozzi, Rami Al-Rfou, and Steven Skiena. 2014. Deepwalk: Online learning of social representations.. In Proc. of SIGKDD . 701--710. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Moshen Shahriari and Mahdi Jalili. 2014. Ranking nodes in signed social networks. SNAM , Vol. 4, 1 (2014), 172.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiliang Tang, Yi Chang, Charu Aggarwal, and Huan Liu. 2016. A survey of signed network mining in social media. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) , Vol. 49, 3 (2016), 42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jian Tang, Meng Qu, Mingzhe Wang, Ming Zhang, Jun Yan, and Qiaozhu Mei. 2015. LINE: Large-scale Information Network Embedding. In Proc. of WWW. 1067--1077. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Vincent A Traag, Yurii E Nesterov, and Paul Van Dooren. 2010. Exponential Ranking: Taking into Account Negative Links.. In SocInfo. Springer, 192--202. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Suhang Wang, Charu Aggarwal, Jiliang Tang, and Huan Liu. 2017a. Attributed signed network embedding. In Proc. of CIKM. ACM, 137--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, Charu Aggarwal, Yi Chang, and Huan Liu. 2017b. Signed network embedding in social media. In Proc. of SDM. SIAM, 327--335.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Robert West, Hristo S Paskov, Jure Leskovec, and Christopher Potts. 2014. Exploiting Social Network Structure for Person-to-Person Sentiment Analysis. TACL , Vol. 2, 1 (2014), 297--310.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Zhaoming Wu, Charu C Aggarwal, and Jimeng Sun. 2016. The troll-trust model for ranking in signed networks. In Proc. of ICDM. ACM, 447--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Xiaofeng Yu and Junqing Xie. 2014. Learning Interactions for Social Prediction in Large-scale Networks. In Proc. of CIKM . 161--170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Shuhan Yuan, Xintao Wu, and Yang Xiang. 2017. Sne: signed network embedding. In Proc. of PAKDD. Springer, 183--195.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Kiyana Zolfaghar and Abdollah Aghaie. 2010. Mining trust and distrust relationships in social Web applications. In Proc. of ICCP. IEEE, 73--80. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. "Bridge": Enhanced Signed Directed Network Embedding

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CIKM '18: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management
      October 2018
      2362 pages
      ISBN:9781450360142
      DOI:10.1145/3269206

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 October 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CIKM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate147of826submissions,18%Overall Acceptance Rate1,861of8,427submissions,22%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader