ABSTRACT
Metamodels are used in model-driven engineering and model-driven software development to define domain specific languages. Over time, they tend to evolve and grow in complexity to encompass new features. If a modular approach is not taken into account and metamodels are extended intrusively, they can become difficult to maintain and to extend. With the increased complexity, it often becomes even more challenging to modularize the metamodels. However, even though modularity is an established concept in the realm of software engineering, existing metamodeling tools barely address the challenges of modular metamodeling.
In this work, we approach the problem from a graphical perspective. We propose a tool that assists the modeler in designing and refactoring metamodels in a modular way. It allows the modeler to explicitly organize metamodels in a layered architecture where each layer has a certain degree of abstraction. The tool detects cyclical dependencies between metamodels and violations to layering and provides key insights about how metamodels depend on each other. By that means, modular metamodeling is encouraged and modularizing metamodels is greatly facilitated.
- D. Strüber et al. 2013. Tool support for clustering large meta-models. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Scalability in Model Driven Engineering. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Strüber et al. 2014. Splitting models using information retrieval and model crawling techniques. In Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. Springer. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Strüber et al. 2014. Tool Support for Model Splitting using Information Retrieval and Model Crawling Techniques.. In BigMDE@ STAF.Google Scholar
- D. Strüber et al. 2016. Managing Model and Meta-Model Components with Export and Import Interfaces.. In BigMDE@ STAF.Google Scholar
- M. Strittmatter et al. 2015. A Modular Reference Structure for Component-based Architecture Description Languages. In ModComp. CEUR.Google Scholar
- M. Völter et al. 2013. Model-driven software development: technology, engineering, management. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- P. Langer et al. 2012. EMF Profiles: A Lightweight Extension Approach for EMF Models. Journal of Object Technology 11, 1 (2012).Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Reussner et al. 2016. Modeling and simulating software architectures: The Palladio approach. MIT Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Arendt et al. 2010. EMF refactor: specification and application of model refactorings within the Eclipse Modeling Framework. In BENEVOL.Google Scholar
- A. Garmendia, E. Guerra, D. S. Kolovos, and J. de Lara. 2014. EMF Splitter: A Structured Approach to EMF Modularity. XM@ MoDELS 1239 (2014).Google Scholar
- René Hahn. 2017. Bad Smells and Antipatterns in Metamodeling. Master's thesis. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Language usage analysis for EMF metamodels on GitHub
AbstractContextEMF metamodels lie at the heart of model-based approaches for a variety of tasks, notably for defining the abstract syntax of modeling languages. The language design of EMF metamodels itself is part of a design process, where the needs of ...
Towards Interoperable Metamodeling Platforms: The Case of Bridging ADOxx and EMF
Advanced Information Systems EngineeringAbstractMetamodeling platforms are an important cornerstone for building domain-specific modeling languages in an efficient and effective way. Two prominent players in the field are ADOxx and the Eclipse Modeling Framework (EMF) which both provide rich ...
Managing the Coupled Evolution of Metamodels and Textual Concrete Syntax Specifications
SEAA '13: Proceedings of the 2013 39th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced ApplicationsIn the context of Model Driven Engineering (MDE) the definition of a Domain Specific Modeling Language (DSML) consists of a set of coordinated artifacts specifying the abstract and concrete syntax of the language, and possibly further aspects related to ...
Comments