skip to main content
10.1145/3270112.3270119acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmodelsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Modularizing and layering metamodels with the modular EMF designer

Published:14 October 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Metamodels are used in model-driven engineering and model-driven software development to define domain specific languages. Over time, they tend to evolve and grow in complexity to encompass new features. If a modular approach is not taken into account and metamodels are extended intrusively, they can become difficult to maintain and to extend. With the increased complexity, it often becomes even more challenging to modularize the metamodels. However, even though modularity is an established concept in the realm of software engineering, existing metamodeling tools barely address the challenges of modular metamodeling.

In this work, we approach the problem from a graphical perspective. We propose a tool that assists the modeler in designing and refactoring metamodels in a modular way. It allows the modeler to explicitly organize metamodels in a layered architecture where each layer has a certain degree of abstraction. The tool detects cyclical dependencies between metamodels and violations to layering and provides key insights about how metamodels depend on each other. By that means, modular metamodeling is encouraged and modularizing metamodels is greatly facilitated.

References

  1. D. Strüber et al. 2013. Tool support for clustering large meta-models. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Scalability in Model Driven Engineering. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. D. Strüber et al. 2014. Splitting models using information retrieval and model crawling techniques. In Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. Springer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. D. Strüber et al. 2014. Tool Support for Model Splitting using Information Retrieval and Model Crawling Techniques.. In BigMDE@ STAF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Strüber et al. 2016. Managing Model and Meta-Model Components with Export and Import Interfaces.. In BigMDE@ STAF.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. M. Strittmatter et al. 2015. A Modular Reference Structure for Component-based Architecture Description Languages. In ModComp. CEUR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Völter et al. 2013. Model-driven software development: technology, engineering, management. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Langer et al. 2012. EMF Profiles: A Lightweight Extension Approach for EMF Models. Journal of Object Technology 11, 1 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. R. Reussner et al. 2016. Modeling and simulating software architectures: The Palladio approach. MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. T. Arendt et al. 2010. EMF refactor: specification and application of model refactorings within the Eclipse Modeling Framework. In BENEVOL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Garmendia, E. Guerra, D. S. Kolovos, and J. de Lara. 2014. EMF Splitter: A Structured Approach to EMF Modularity. XM@ MoDELS 1239 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. René Hahn. 2017. Bad Smells and Antipatterns in Metamodeling. Master's thesis. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MODELS '18: Proceedings of the 21st ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings
    October 2018
    214 pages

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 14 October 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    MODELS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate19of29submissions,66%Overall Acceptance Rate118of382submissions,31%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader