skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Blending Human and Artificial Intelligence to Support Autistic Children’s Social Communication Skills

Authors Info & Claims
Published:20 December 2018Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article examines the educational efficacy of a learning environment in which children diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Conditions (ASC) engage in social interactions with an artificially intelligent (AI) virtual agent and where a human practitioner acts in support of the interactions. A multi-site intervention study in schools across the UK was conducted with 29 children with ASC and learning difficulties, aged 4--14 years old. For reasons related to data completeness and amount of exposure to the AI environment, data for 15 children was included in the analysis. The analysis revealed a significant increase in the proportion of social responses made by ASC children to human practitioners. The number of initiations made to human practitioners and to the virtual agent by the ASC children also increased numerically over the course of the sessions. However, due to large individual differences within the ASC group, this did not reach significance. Although no evidence of transfer to the real-world post-test was shown, anecdotal evidence of classroom transfer was reported. The work presented in this article offers an important contribution to the growing body of research in the context of AI technology design and use for autism intervention in real school contexts. Specifically, the work highlights key methodological challenges and opportunities in this area by leveraging interdisciplinary insights in a way that (i) bridges between educational interventions and intelligent technology design practices, (ii) considers the design of technology as well as the design of its use (context and procedures) on par with one another, and (iii) includes design contributions from different stakeholders, including children with and without ASC diagnosis, educational practitioners, and researchers.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. B. Abirached, Y. Zhang, J. Aggarwal, B. Tamersoy, T. Fernandes, J. Miranda, and V. Orvalho. 2009. Improving communication skills of children with ASDs through interaction with virtual characters. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1st International Conference on Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH). 1--4. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Alcorn, H. Pain, G. Rajendran, T. Smith, O. Lemon, K. Porayska-Pomsta, M. E. Foster, K. Avramides, C. Frauenberger, and S. Bernardini. 2011. Social communication between virtual characters and children with autism. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED’11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 7--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. M. Alcorn. 2016. Embedding novel and surprising elements in touch-screen games for children with autism: creating experiences ‘worth communicating about’. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. K. Anderson, E. André, T. Baur, S. Bernardini, M. Chollet, E. Chryssafidou, I. Damian, C. Ennis, A. Egges, P. Gebhard, H. Jones, M. Ochs, C. Pelachaud, K. Porayska-Pomsta, P. Rizzo, and N. Sabouret. 2013. The TARDIS framework: Intelligent virtual agents for social coaching in job interviews. In Advances in Computer Entertainment. Springer, 476--491.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A. Anwar, M. Rahman, S. Ferdous, S. Anik, and S. Ahmed. 2011. AA computer game based approach for increasing fluency in the speech of the autistic children. In Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT’11). 17--18. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. APA. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-5). American Psychiatric Association.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Aylett, N. Vannini, E. Andre, A. Paiva, S. Enz, and L. Hall. 2009. But it was another country: Agents and intercultural empathy. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (I/International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.). Vol. 1, 329--336. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. R. S. Baker. 2016. Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans.International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26, 2 (2016), 600--614.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. E. Barakova, G. van Wanrooij, R. van Limpt, and M. Menting. 2007. Using an emergent system concept in designing interactive games for autistic children. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. (IDC’07). ACM, 73--76. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. L. Barnard-Brak, A. Brewer, S. Chesnut, D. Richman, and A. M. Schaeffer. 2016. The sensitivity and specificity of the social communication questionnaire for autism spectrum with respect to age. Autism Research 9, 8 (2016), 838--845.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. L. Bartoli, C. Corradi, F. Garzotto, and M. Valoriani. 2013. Exploring motion-based touchless games for autistic children?s learning. In Proceedings of the ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC’13). ACM, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Battocchi, F. Pianesi, D. Tomasini, M. Zancanaro, G. Esposito, P. Venuti, A. Ben Sasson, E. Gal, and P. L. Weiss. 2013. Collaborative puzzle game: A tabletop interactive game for fostering collaboration in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces (ITS’09). ACM, 197--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. N. Bauminger. 2002. The facilitation of social-emotional understanding and social interaction in high-functioning children with autism: Intervention outcomes. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 32 (2002), 283--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. R. Beaumont and K. Sofronoff. 2008. A multi-component social skills intervention for children with asperger syndrome: The junior detective training program.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 49 (2008), 743--753.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. S. Bernardini and K. Porayska-Pomsta. 2013. Planning-based social partners for children with autism. In Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS-13). AAAI Press, Rome, Itay. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Bernardini, K. Porayska-Pomsta, and Smith T. J. 2014. Echoes: An intelligent serious game for fostering social communication in children with autism. Information Sciences 264 (2014), 41--60. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. Biesta. 2007. Why “what works” won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research.Educational Theory 57, 1 (2007), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. G. Biesta. 2013. The Beautiful Risk of Education. Boulder and London: Paradigm Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Bosseler and D. Massaro. 2003. Development and evaluation of a computer- animated tutor for vocabulary and language learning in children with autism. IJournal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 33, 6 (2003), 653--672.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. M. O. Cavazza, F. Charles, and S. J. Mead. 2002. Character-based interactive storytelling. IEEE Intelligent Systems 17, 4 (2002), 17--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. H.-M. Chiang and M. Carter. 2008. Spontaneity of communication in individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 38, 4 (2008), 693--705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. Cobb. 2007. Virtual environments supporting learning and communication in special needs education. Topics in Language Disorders 27, 3 (2007), 211--225.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 1991. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper Perennial, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0060920432/ref=si3_rdr_bb_product/104-4616565-4570345Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. K. Dautenhahn and I. Werry. 2004. Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: Background, motivation and challenges. Pragmatics and Cognition 12, 1 (2004), 1--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. M. Dennis, D. J. Francis, P. T. Cirino, R. Schachar, M. A. Barnes, and J. M. Fletcher. 2009. Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 15, 3 (2009), 331--343.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. J. Dewey. 1998. Experience and Nature. Dover Publications Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. J. Dias and A. Paiva. 2005. Feeling and reasoning: A computational model for emotional characters. In Progress in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 3808. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 127--140. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. H. E. Dingfelder and D. S. Mandell. 2011. Bridging the research-to-practice gap: An application of diffusion of innovation theory. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 41, 5 (2011), 597--609.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. W. Farr, N. Yuill, and H. Raffle. 2010. Social benefits of a tangible user interface for children with autistic spectrum conditions. Autism 14, 3 (2010), 237--252.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. S. L. Finkelstein, A. Nickel, L. Harrison, E. A. Suma, and T. Barnes. 2009. cMotion: A new game design to teach emotion recognition and programming logic to children using virtual humans. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. 249--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. S. Fletcher-Watson. 2014. A targeted review of computer-assisted learning for people with autism spectrum disorder: Towards a consistent methodology. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 1, 2 (2014), 87--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. S. Fletcher-Watson, H. Pain, S. Hammond, A. Humphry, and H. McConachie. 2016. Designing for young children with autism spectrum disorder: A case study of an iPad app. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 7 (2016), 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. M. E. Foster, K. Avramides, S. Bernardini, J. Chen, C. Frauenberger, O. Lemon, and K. Porayska-Pomsta. 2010. Supporting children?s social communication skills through interactive narratives with virtual characters. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia. ACM, Florence, Italy. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. C. Frauenberger, J. Good, A. Alcorn, and H. Pain. 2013. Conversing through and about technologies: Design critique as an opportunity to engage children with autism and broaden research(er) perspectives. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 1, 2 (2013), 38--49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. C. Frauenberger, J. Good, and W. Keay-Bright. 2010. Phenomenology, a framework for participatory design. In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference (PDC’10). ACM, New York, NY, 187--190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. C. Frauenberger, J. Good, and W. Keay-Bright. 2011. Designing technology for children with special needs: Bridging perspectives through participatory design. CoDesign 7, 1 (2011), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. O. Golan, E. Ashwin, Y. Granader, S. McClintock, K. Day, V. Leggett, and S. Baron-Cohen. 2010. A multi-component social skills intervention for children with asperger syndrome: The junior detective training program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 40 (2010), 269--279.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. M. Goodwin. 2008. Enhancing and accelerating the pace of autism research and treatment: The promise of developing innovative technology. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 23, 2 (2008).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. C. Gray and J. Garand. 1993. Social stories: Improving responses of students with autism with accurate social information. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 8, 1 (1993), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. O. Grynszpan, J.-C. Martin, and J. Nadel. 2008. Multimedia interfaces for users with high functioning autism: An empirical investigation. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies 66, 8 (2008), 628--639. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. O. Grynszpan, P. L. T. Weiss, F. Perez-Diaz, and E. Gal. 2014. Innovative technology-based interventions for autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Autism 18, 4 (2014), 851--871.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. K. Guldberg. 2017. Evidence based practice in autism educational research: Can we bridge the research and practice gap? Oxford Review of Education 43, 4 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. K. Guldberg, S. Parsons, K. Porayska-Pomsta, and W. Keay-Bright. 2017. Challenging the knowledge transfer orthodoxy: Knowledge co-construction in technology enhanced learning for children with autism. British Educational Research Journal 43, 2 (2017), 384--413.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. M. Hauck, D. Fein, L. Waterhouse, and C. Feinstein. 1995. Social initiations by autistic children to adults and other children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 25 (1995), 579--595.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. G. Herrera, F. Alcantud, R. Jordan, A. Blanquer, G. Labajo, and C. De Pablo. 2008. Development of symbolic play through the use of virtual reality tools for children with autism spectrum disorders. Two case studies. Sage Publications and The National Autistic Society 12, 2 (2008), 143--157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. G. Herrera, Casas X., J. Sevilla, L. Rosa, C. Pardo, J. Plaza, R. Jordan, and S. Le Groux. 2012. Pictogram room: Natural interaction technologies to aid in the development of children with autism. Annuary of Clinical and Health Psychology 8 (2012), 39--44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. S. Holt and N. Yuill. 2017. Tablets for two: How dual tablets can facilitate other-awareness and communication in learning disabled children with autism. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 11 (2017), 72--82. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. I. M. Hopkins, M. W. Gower, T. A. Perez, D. S. Smith, F. R. Amthor, and et al. 2011. Avatar assistant: Improving social skills in students with an ASD through a computer-based intervention. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 41, 11 (2011), 1543--1555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. J. P. Hourcade, S. R. Williams, E. A. Miller, K. E. Huebner, and L. J. Liang. 2013. Evaluation of tablet apps to encourage social interaction in children with autism spectrum disorders. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’13). ACM, New York, 3197--3206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. N. Kandalaft, M. R. Didehbani, D. C. Krawczyk, T. T. Allen, and S. B. Chapman. 2013. Virtual reality social cognition training for young adults with high-functioning autism, journal of autism and developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 43, 1 (2013), 34--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. P. Kenny, H. Arno, J. Gratch, W. Swartout, D. R. Traum, S. Marsella, and D. Piepol. 2007. Building interactive virtual humans for training environments. In Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. H. Kozima, M. Michalowski, and C. Nakagawa. 2009. Keepon: A playful robot for research, therapy, and entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 1 (2009), 3--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. C. Lord, M. Rutter, P. DiLavore, S. Risi, K. Gotham, and S. Bishop. 2012. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule: ADOS-2. Western Psychological Services Torrance.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. L. Malinverni, J. Mora, V. Padillo, A. Hervas, and N. Pares. 2014. Pico?s adventure: A kinect game to promote social initiation in children with autism spectrum disorder. In Proceedings of the ITASD International Conference (IDC’16). ACM, Paris, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. D. Massaro. 2006. Embodied agents in language learning for children with language challenges. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. (ICCHP?06). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 809--816. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. J. Mora-Guiard, C. Crowell, N. Pares, and Heaton. P. 2016. Lands of fog: Helping children with autism in social interaction through full-body interactive experience. In Proceedings of the ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC’16). ACM, Manchester, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. L. Mottron. 2004. Matching strategies in cognitive research with individuals with high-functioning autism: Current practices, instrument biases, and recommendations. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34, 1 (2004), 19--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. P. Mundy, C. Delgado, J. Block, M. Venezia, A. Hogan, and J. Seibert. 2003. Early Social Communication Scales. University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. NAS 2016. What is autism? Retrieved November 12, 2016 from http://www.autism.org.uk/about/what-is.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. A. Ortony, G L. Clore, and A. Collins. 1988. The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. S. Parsons, T. Charman, R. Faulkner, J. Ragan, S. Wallace, and K. Wittemeyer. 2013. Commentary? bridging the research and practice gap in autism: The importance of creating research partnerships with schools. Autism 17, 3 (2013), 268--280.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. S. Parsons and S. Cobb. 2011. State-of-the-art of virtual reality technologies for children on the autism spectrum. European Journal of Special Needs Education 26, 3 (2011), 355--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. S. Parsons, K. Guldberg, A. MacLeod, G. Jones, A. Prunty, and T. Balfe. 2007. International review of the evidence on best practice in educational provision for children on the autism spectrum. European Journal of Special Needs Education 26, 1 (2007), 47--63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. S. Parsons, K. Guldberg, K. Porayska-Pomsta, and R. Lee. 2015. Digital stories as a method for evidence-based practice and knowledge co-creation in technology-enhanced learning for children with autism. International Journal of Research and Method in Education 38, 3 (2015), 247--271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. S. Parsons and P. Mitchell. 2017. The potential of virtual reality in social skills training for people with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 46, 5 (2017), 430--443.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. R. C. Pennington. 2010. Computer-assisted instruction for teaching academic skills to students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 25, 1 (2010), 239--248.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. C. Pole and M. Morrison. 2003. Ethnography for Education. Open University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. K. Porayska-Pomsta. 2016. AI as a methodology for supporting educational praxis and teachers? Metacognition. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 26, 2 (2016), 679--700.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. K. Porayska-Pomsta, K. Anderson, S. Bernardini, K. Guldberg, T. Smith, L. Kossivaki, S. Hodgings, and I. Lowe. 2013. Building and an intelligent, authorable serious game for autistic children and their carers. In Advances in Computer Entertainment. Springer, Cham, 456--475.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. K. Porayska-Pomsta, C. Frauenberger, H. Pain, G. Rajendran, T. Smith, R. Menzies, M. E. Foster, A. Alcorn, S. Wass, S. Bernardini, K. Avramides, W. Keay-Bright, J. Chen, A. Waller, K. Guldberg, J. Good, and O. Lemon. 2011. Developing technology for autism: An interdisciplinary approach. Personal Ubiquitous Compututing 16, 2 (Feb. 2011), 117--127. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. B. M. Prizant, A. M. Wetherby, E. Rubin, and A. C. Laurent. 2003. The SCERTS model: A transactional, family-centered approach to enhancing communication and socioemotional ability in children with autism spectrum disorder. Infants and Young Children 16, 4 (2003), 296--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. B.M. Prizant, A.M. Wetherby, E. Rubin, A.C. Laurent, and P.J. Rydell. 2006. The SCERTS® Model: A Comprehensive Educational Approach for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Brookes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. M. M. Rahman, S. Ferdous, S. I. Ahmed, and A. Anwar. 2011. Speech development of autistic children by interactive computer games. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 8, 4 (2011), 208--223.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. G. Rajendran. 2013. Virtual environments and autism: A developmental psychopathological approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29, 4 (2013), 334--347.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. S. Ramdoss, R. Lang, A. Mulloy, J. Franco, M. O’Reilly, R. Didden, and G. Lancioni. 2011a. Use of computer-based interventions to teach communication skills to children with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Behavioral Education 20, 1 (2011), 55--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. S. Ramdoss, A. Mulloy, R. Lang, M. O’Reilly, J. Sigafoos, and et al. Lancioni, G.2011b. Use of computer-based interventions to improve literacy skills in students with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 5, 4 (2011), 1306--1318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. P. A. Rao, D. C. Beidel, and M. J. Murray. 2008. Character-based interactive storytelling. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 38, 2 (Feb. 2008), 353--361.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. V. S. Rao, V. Raman, and A. V. Mysore. 2015. Issues related to obtaining intelligence quotient-matched controls in autism research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 37, 2 (2015), 149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. B. Reichow, F. R. Volkmar, and D. V. Chiccetti. 2008. Development of the evaluative method for evaluating and determining evidence-based practices in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 38 (2008), 1311--1319.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. G. Reynhout and M. Carter. 2009. The use of social stories by teachers and their perceived efficacy. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders 3, 1 (2009), 232--251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. S. J. Russell and P. Norvig. 2003. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (2nd ed.) Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  82. N. J. Salkind. 2010. Encyclopedia of Research Design. Sage Research Methods.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. D. Scattone, D. H. Tingstrom, and S. M. Wilczynski. 2006. Increasing appropriate social interactions of children with autism spectrum disorders using social StoriesTM. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities 21, 4 (2006), 211--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  84. B. Schuller, E. Marchi, S. Baron-Cohen, H. OReilly, P. Robinson, I. Davies, O. Golan, S. Friedenson, S. Tal, S. Newman, N. Meir, R. Shillo, A. Camurri, S. Piana, S. Blte, D. Lundqvist, B. Berggren, S. A., and N. Sullings. 2013. IASC-inclusion: Interactive emotion games for social inclusion of children with autism spectrum conditions. In Proceedings 1st International Workshop on Intelligent Digital Games for Empowerment and Inclusion (IDGEI’13).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. C. A. Smith and R. S. Lazarus. 1990. Emotion and adaptation. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. I. Vlahavas, D. Vrakas, and L.A. Pervin (Eds.). Guilford, New York, Chapter 23, 609--637.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. A. C. Stahmer, L. Schreimban, and A. B. Cunningham. 2011. Toward a technology of treatment individualization for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain Research 1380 (2011), 229--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  87. D. C. Strickland, D. McAllister, C. D. Coles, and S. Osborne. 2007. An evolution of virtual reality training designs for children with autism and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders. Topics in Language Disorders 27, 3 (2007), 226--241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  88. J. Suh, A. Orinstein, M. Barton, C. M. Chen, I. M. Eigsti, N. Ramirez-Esparza, and D. Fein. 2016. Ratings of broader autism phenotype and personality traits in optimal outcomes from autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 46, 11 (2016), 3505--3518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  89. A. Tartaro and J. Cassell. 2008. Playing with virtual peers: Bootstrapping contingent discourse in children with autism. In Proceedings of the International Conference on the Learning Sciences (ICLA’08). ACM, 382--389. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Report US National Research Council. 2002. Scientific Research in Education. Technical Report. US National Research Council.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. S. Wass and K. Porayska-Pomsta. 2014. The uses of cognitive training technologies in the treatment of autism spectrum disorders. Autism: International Journal of Research and Practice. 18, 8 (2014), 851--871.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  92. C. Whalen and L. Schreibman. 2003. Joint attention training for children with autism using behavior modification procedures. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 44, 3 (2003), 456--468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  93. M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. 1995. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review 10, 2 (1995), 115--152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  94. B. Woolf. 2008. Building Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Morgan Kaufman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Blending Human and Artificial Intelligence to Support Autistic Children’s Social Communication Skills

      Recommendations

      Reviews

      Chuanlei Zhang

      Children with autism spectrum conditions (ASC) experience various levels of difficulty in social communication and interaction, in addition to showing restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior. This paper proposes a technology-based learning environment, ECHOES, to help children with ASC engage in social interactions. "Informed by and validated against the [social communication, emotional regulation, and transactional support, SCERTS] model, a comprehensive approach to autism assessment and intervention," the single-user ECHOES environment utilizes an artificially intelligent (AI) agent with whom children can explore various activities. This AI agent engages the user in both proactive and reactive ways of learning with 12 learning activities. Evaluation included participants, aged 4 to 14, in a multi-site study in the United Kingdom (UK). Results show an "increase in the proportion of [social] responses" to both human practitioners and the AI agent. The contributions of this paper are at least twofold: 1) a technology-based learning environment to facilitate children with ASC, and 2) the adoption of an AI agent to engage children in both proactive and reactive ways of learning. This study will benefit the design research on learning environments for children with ASC, especially those with AI involvement, and can be a helpful teaching tool for educators.

      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader