skip to main content
10.1145/3273024.3273026acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdlfmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Scores of scores: an openscore project to encode and share sheet music

Published:28 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

This article reports on 'OpenScore', an initiative for encoding and sharing sheet music, and its first substantial sub-project, the 'Scores of Scores' Lieder Encoding Project in association with the social enterprise 'Four Score and More'. The project incorporated a wide range of approaches---including the re-licensing of existing encodings, automated file format conversion, and crowdsourcing encodings to new specifications---which may be taken as a summary of the state of play in this rapidly changing field. This paper sets out our experiences and focuses on the issues which may be of most interest and use to others considering similar projects, particularly those managing submissions from diverse sources.

References

  1. Maura Church and Michael Scott Cuthbert. 2014. Improving Rhythmic Transcriptions via Probability Models Applied Post-OMR. In Proceedings of the 15th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2014, Taipei, Taiwan, October 27--31, 2014. 643--648.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Tim Crawford. 1991. TabCode for Lute Repertories. Computing in Musicology 7 (1991), 57--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael Scott Cuthbert. 2013. EMMSAP: Electronic Medieval Music Score Archive Project {digital resource}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Michael Scott Cuthbert and Christopher Ariza. 2010. Music21: A Toolkit for Computer-Aided Musicology and Symbolic Music Data. In Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2010, Utrecht, Netherlands, August 9--13, 2010. 637--642.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Reinier de Valk, Anja Volk, Andre Holzapfel, Aggelos Pikrakis, Nadine Kroher, and Joren Six. 2017. MIRchiving: Challenges and Opportunities of Connecting MIR Research and Digital Music Archives. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology (DLfM '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 25--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ichiro Fujinaga, Andrew Hankinson, and Laurent Pugin. 2018. Automatic Score Extraction with Optical Music Recognition (OMR). In Springer Handbook of Systematic Musicology. Springer, 299--311.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. W3C Music Notation Community Group. 2018. MNX Draft Specification. https://w3c.github.io/mnx/specification/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jill Halstead. 1997. The woman composer: Creativity and the gendered politics of musical composition. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Andrew Hankinson, Perry Roland, and Ichiro Fujinaga. 2011. The Music Encoding Initiative as a Document-Encoding Framework. In Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2011, Miami, Florida, USA, October 24--28, 2011. 293--298. http://ismir2011.ismir.net/papers/OS3-1.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Barbara Garvey Jackson. 1977. Florence Price, Composer. The Black Perspective in Music (1977), 31--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Andrew Kirkman. 2015. Review: The Josquin Research Project by Jesse Rodin and Craig Sapp. Journal of the American Musicological Society 68, 2 (2015), 455--465. arXiv:htp://jams.ucpress.edu/content/68/2/455.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Bettye Krolick. 1996. New international manual of Braille music notation. Braille Press Zurich.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. David Lewis, Yun Fan, Glenn Henshaw, and Kevin Page. 2017. Musicology of Digital Libraries: Structure in RILM. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology (DLfM '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 59--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Casey A. Mullin. 2010. {Review of IMSLP}. Notes 67, 2 (2010), 376--381. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40926624Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Néstor Nápoles, Gabriel Vigliensoni, and Ichiro Fujinaga. 2018. Encoding Matters. In Proceedings of the 5rd International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology (DLfM 2018). ACM, New York, NY, USA, {pp.TBC}. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Markus Neuwirth, Daniel Harasim, Fabian C. Moss, and Martin Rohrmeier. 2018. The Annotated Beethoven Corpus (ABC): A Dataset of Harmonic Analyses of All Beethoven String Quartets. Frontiers in Digital Humanities 5 (2018), 16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Karin Pendle and Melinda Boyd. 2012. Women in music: a research and information guide. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Laurent Pugin, Rodolfo Zitellini, and Perry Roland. 2014. Verovio: A library for Engraving MEI Music Notation into SVG.. In ISMIR. 107--112.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ana Rebelo, Ichiro Fujinaga, Filipe Paszkiewicz, Andre R. S. Marcal, Carlos Guedes, and Jaime S. Cardoso. 2012. Optical music recognition: state-of-the-art and open issues. International Journal of Multimedia Information Retrieval 1, 3 (Oct 2012), 173--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Rafael Caro Repetto and Xavier Serra. 2017. A Collection of Music Scores for Corpus Based Jingju Singing Research. In Proceedings of the 18th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR 2017, Suzhou, China, October 23--27, 2017. 46--52. https://ismir2017.smcnus.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/119_Paper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jesse Rodin, Craig Sapp, and Clare Bokulich. 2010. Josquin Research Project {digital resource}. http://josquin.stanford.edu/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Perry Roland. 2002. The music encoding initiative (MEI). In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Musical Applications Using XML, Vol. 1060. 55--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Charalampos Saitis, Andrew Hankinson, and Ichiro Fujinaga. 2014. Correcting Large-Scale OMR Data with Crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Digital Libraries for Musicology (DLfM '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1--3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Craig Stuart Sapp. 2005. Online Database of Scores in the Humdrum File Format. In ISMIR 2005, 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, London, UK, 11--15 September 2005, Proceedings. 664--665. http://ismir2005.ismir.net/proceedings/3123.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Helmut Schaffrath. 1995. The Essen Folksong Collection in Kern Format {digital resource}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Eleanor Selfridge-Field. 1994. Optical recognition of musical notation: A survey of current work. Computing in Musicology 9 (1994), 109--145.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Leigh VanHandel and Tian Song. 2010. The role of meter in compositional style in 19th century French and German art song. Journal of New Music Research 39, 1 (2010), 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Richard Wagner. (trans./ed. Anthony Gray and Mary Whittall 1983). Richard Wagner: My Life. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Scores of scores: an openscore project to encode and share sheet music

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Other conferences
              DLfM '18: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Digital Libraries for Musicology
              September 2018
              101 pages
              ISBN:9781450365222
              DOI:10.1145/3273024

              Copyright © 2018 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 28 September 2018

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              DLfM '18 Paper Acceptance Rate14of27submissions,52%Overall Acceptance Rate27of48submissions,56%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader