skip to main content
10.1145/3284557.3284738acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiscsicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Impact of Virtualization on Cloud Computing Energy Consumption: Empirical Study

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 September 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Global warming, which is currently one of the greatest environmental challenges, is caused by carbon emissions. A report from the Energy Information Administration indicates that approximately 98% of CO2 emissions can be attributed to energy consumption. The trade-off between efficient and ecologically sound operation represents a major challenge faced by many organizations at present. In addition, numerous companies are currently compelled to pay a carbon tax for the resources they use and the environmental impact of their products and services. Therefore, an energy consumption system can generate actual financial payback. Green information technology involves various approaches, including power management, recycling, telecommunications, and virtualization. This paper focuses on comparing and evaluating techniques used for reducing energy consumption in virtualized environments. We first highlight the impact of virtualization techniques on minimizing energy consumption in cloud computing. Then we present an experimental comparative study between two common energy-efficient task scheduling algorithms in cloud computing (i.e., the green scheduler, the power saver scheduler). These algorithms are discussed briefly and analyzed. The three metrics used to evaluate the task scheduling algorithms are (1) total power consumption, (2) data center load, and (3) virtual machine load. This work aims to gauge and subsequently improve energy consumption efficiency in virtualized environments.

References

  1. Atiewi, S., Yussof, S., Rusli, M. E. B., & Zalloum, M. (2018). A power saver scheduling algorithm using DVFS and DNS techniques in cloud computing data centres. International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing, 9(4), 385--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baliga, J., Ayre, R. W. A., Hinton, K., & Tucker, R. S. (2011). Green Cloud Computing: Balancing Energy in Processing, Storage, and Transport. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(1), 149--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Buyya, R., Ranjan, R., & Calheiros, R. N. (2009). Modeling and Simulation of Scalable Cloud Computing Environments and the CloudSim Toolkit: Challenges and Opportunities, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Buyya, R., Ranjan, R., & Calheiros, R. N. (2010). InterCloud: Utility-Oriented Federation of Cloud Computing Environments for Scaling of. In International Conference on Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing (pp. 13--31). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Clark, K. Fraser, S. Hand, J. G. Hansen, E. Jul, C. Limpach, I. Pratt, and A. Warfield, "Live migration of virtual machines," in the 2nd Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI 2005), Boston, Massachusetts, USA, 2005, pp. 273--286. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cisco. (2007). Cisco Data Center Infrastructure 2.5 Design Guide. Cisco, (6387).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cisco. (2009). Cisco Data Center Interconnect Design and Implementation Guide. System. Retrieved from http://www.cisco.com/en/US/solutions/collateral/ns340/ns517/ns224/ns949/ns304/ns975/data_center_interconnect_design_guide.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Creasy R.J. The Origin of the VM 370 Time-Sharing System. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1981;25:483--490. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. D. Talbot, "Greener Computing in the cloud," Technology Review, 24 May 2018. {Online}. Available: http://www.technologyreview.com/business/23520/page1/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldberg R.P. Architecture of Virtual Machines. Proceedings of the Workshop of Virtual Computer Systems; New York, NY, USA. 30 April 1973; pp. 74--112. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kappel J.A., Velte A.T., Velte T.J. Microsoft Virtualization with Hyper-V. McGraw Hill Professional; New York, NY, USA: 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Kliazovich, D., Bouvry, P., & Khan, S. U. (2010). DENS: Data Center Energy-Efficient Network-Aware Scheduling. 2010 IEEE/ACM Int'l Conference on Green Computing and Communications & Int'l Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 16(1), 69--75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Kliazovich, D., Bouvry, P., & Khan, S. U. (2012). GreenCloud: A packet-level simulator of energy-aware cloud computing data centers. Journal of Supercomputing, 62(3), 1263--1283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Mahadevan, P., Sharma, P., Banerjee, S., & Ranganathan, P. (2009). A power benchmarking framework for network devices. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5550 LNCS, pp. 795--808). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Malhotra, L., Agarwal, D., & Jaiswal, A. (2014). Virtualization in cloud computing. J Inform Tech Softw Eng, 4(136), 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ou, G. (2006). Introduction to server virtualization. TechRepubliccom, 5, 1. Retrieved from http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-6074941.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Panek W., Wentworth T. Mastering Microsoft Windows 7 Administration. John Wiley and Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Pike Research, "Cloud Computing Energy Efficiency," Pike Research, Boulder, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. R. Raghavendra, P. Ranganathan, V. Talwar, Z. Wang, and X. Zhu, "No "power" struggles: coordinated multi-level power management for the data center," in the 13th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS 2008), Seattle, WA, USA, 2008, pp. 48--59 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rao K.T., Kiran P.S., Reddy L.S.S. Energy Efficiency in Datacenters through Virtualization: A Case Study. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2010;10:2--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Szubert D. The Register; 2007. Virtualisation Gets Trendy. Available online:http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/06/06/virtualisation_gets_trendyGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu, C. M., Chang, R. S., & Chan, H. Y. (2014). A green energy-efficient scheduling algorithm using the DVFS technique for cloud datacenters. Future Generation Computer Systems, 37, 141--147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Ye, K., Huang, D., Jiang, X., Chen, H., & Wu, S. (2010). Virtual Machine Based Energy-Efficient Data Center Architecture for Cloud Computing: A Performance Perspective. 2010 IEEE/ACM Int'l Conference on Green Computing and Communications & Int'l Conference on Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, 171--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Z. Zhang and S. Fu, "Characterizing power and energy usage in cloud computing systems," in the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom 2011), Athens, Greece, 2011, pp. 146--153. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Impact of Virtualization on Cloud Computing Energy Consumption: Empirical Study

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          ISCSIC '18: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Computer Science and Intelligent Control
          September 2018
          363 pages
          ISBN:9781450366281
          DOI:10.1145/3284557

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 21 September 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          ISCSIC '18 Paper Acceptance Rate73of152submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate192of401submissions,48%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader