skip to main content
10.1145/3287324.3287410acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Educational Experiences of Blind Programmers

Published:22 February 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

As diversity efforts in computer science begin to recognize disabled programmers as an underrepresented group, we step back to chronicle the experiences of blind programmers in higher education. Through a survey and follow-up interviews with 10 blind programmers, we share reflections and barriers important for the computing education community to understand as we attempt to welcoming cultures for disabled programmers. Our findings illuminated a variety of barriers blind programmers faced in college and the impact that they had on their ability to succeed in the field. We found that barriers permeate all parts of these blind student's' education from accessing the materials and doing the homework to working with professors. These barriers increased feelings of the isolation, decreased motivation especially when tasks were inaccessible, and prevented them from learning all the concepts covered in their degree program.

References

  1. Catherine M. Baker, Lauren R. Milne, and Richard E. Ladner. 2015. StructJumper: A Tool to Help Blind Programmers Navigate and Understand the Structure of Code. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, 3043--3052. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Suzanne P. Balik, Sean P. Mealin, Matthias F. Stallmann, Robert D. Rodman, Michelle L. Glatz, and Veronica J. Sigler. 2014. Including Blind People in Computing Through Access to Graphs. In Proceedings of the 16th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility - ASSETS '14, 91--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jeffrey P. Bigham, Maxwell B. Aller, Jeremy T. Brudvik, Jessica O. Leung, Lindsay A. Yazzolino, and Richard E. Ladner. 2008. Inspiring Blind High School Students to Pursue Computer Science with Instant Messaging Chatbots. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '08, 449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Sheryl Burgstahler. 2008. Equal access: {Universal} design of instruction. Retrieved November 13, 2018 from https://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/sites/default/files/doit-sync/files/Equal-Access-Universal-Design-of-Instruction.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sheryl Burgstahler and Richard Ladner. 2006. AccessComputing: From Research to Practice | The Alliance for Access to Computing Careers. Retrieved May 3, 2016 from http://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/resources/accesscomputing-research-practiceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Parham Doustdar. 2016. The Tools of a Blind Programmer -- Parham Doustdar's Blog. Retrieved April 21, 2016 from https://www.parhamdoustdar.com/2016/04/03/tools-of-blind-programmer/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandrika Jayant, Matt Renzelmann, Dana Wen, Satria Krisnandi, Richard Ladner, and Dan Comden. 2007. Automated Tactile Graphics Translation: In the Field. Proceedings of the 9th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - Assets '07: 75. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Maggie Johnson. 2015. The Computer Science Pipeline and Diversity: Part 1 - How did we get here? Retrieved May 7, 2016 from http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2015/07/the-computer-science-pipeline-and.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Shaun K. Kane and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2014. Tracking @stemxcomet: Teaching Programming to Blind Students via 3D Printing, Crisis Management, and Twitter. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '14, 247--252. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Stephanie Ludi. 2013. Robotics Programming Tools for Blind Students. In 28th Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference Scientific/Research Proceedings. Retrieved May 26, 2016 from http://scholarworks.calstate.edu/handle/10211.3/121968Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sean Mealin and E Murphy-Hill. 2012. An Exploratory Study of Blind Software Developers. In Proceedings of 2012 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing - VL/HCC '12. Retrieved February 27, 2014 from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6344485Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Venkatesh Potluri, Priyan Vaithilingam, Suresh Iyengar, Y. Vidya, Manohar Swaminathan, and Gopal Srinivasa. 2018. CodeTalk. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, 1--11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. T. V. Raman. 1996. Emacspeak--Direct Speech Access. In Proceedings of the Second Annual ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies - Assets '96, 32--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jaime Sánchez and Fernando Aguayo. 2005. Blind Learners Programming Through Audio. Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '05: 1769--1772. Retrieved February 27, 2014 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1057018 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ann C. Smith, Joan M. Francioni, Mohd Anwar, Justin S. Cook, Asif Hossain, and M. Fayezur Rahman. 2003. Nonvisual Tool for Navigating Hierarchical Structures. In Proceedings of the 6th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS '04, 133. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Andreas Stefik, Christopher Hundhausen, and Robert Patterson. 2011. An empirical investigation into the design of auditory cues to enhance computer program comprehension. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69, 12: 820--838. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Andreas M. Stefik, Christopher Hundhausen, and Derrick Smith. 2011. On the Design of an Educational Infrastructure for the Blind and Visually Impaired in Computer Science. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education - SIGCSE '11, 571. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Paul Vickers and James L Alty. 2002. When bugs sing. Interacting with Computers 14, 6: 793--819.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. About | The Alliance for Access to Computing Careers. Retrieved April 21, 2016 from http://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/aboutGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. EdSharp. Retrieved November 8, 2017 from https://github.com/EmpowermentZone/EdSharpGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Learning Ally - Support for Dyslexia and Learning Disabilities. Retrieved May 7, 2016 from https://www.learningally.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Communities of Practice | AccessComputing. Retrieved December 1, 2018 from https://www.washington.edu/accesscomputing/get-involved/educators-employers/communities-practiceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Educational Experiences of Blind Programmers

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '19: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
      February 2019
      1364 pages
      ISBN:9781450358903
      DOI:10.1145/3287324

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 February 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      SIGCSE '19 Paper Acceptance Rate169of526submissions,32%Overall Acceptance Rate1,488of4,227submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader