Approaches for Coordinating eTextbooks, Online Programming Practice, Automated Grading, and More into One Course

ABSTRACT

We share approaches for coordinating the use of many online educational tools within a CS2 course, including an eTextbook, automated grading system, programming practice website, diagramming tool, and debugger. These work with other commonly used tools such as a response system, forum, version control system, and our learning management system. We describe a number of approaches to deal with the potential negative effects of adopting so many tools. To improve student success we scaffold tool use by staging the addition of tools and by introducing individual tools in phases, we test tool assignments before student use, and we adapt tool use based on student feedback and performance. We streamline course management by consulting mentors who have used the tools before, starting small with room to grow, and choosing tools that simplify student account and grade management across multiple tools.

References

1. C.T. Amelink, K. Davis, B.G. Ryder, and M.O. Ellis. 2018. Exploring Factors Influencing the Continued Interest in a Computer Science Major. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition .
2. A. Bandura. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, Vol. 84 (1977), 191--215.
3. M. Beier, J. Lesko, and C. Amelink. 2018. Engineering Self-Efficacy: What it is, Why it Matters, and How to Encourage it! https://www.wepan.org/page/SelfEfficacy .
4. Luciana Benotti, Federico Aloi, Franco Bulgarelli, and Marcos J. Gomez. 2018. The Effect of a Web-based Coding Tool with Automatic Feedback on Students' Performance and Perceptions. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). 2--7.
5. P. Brusilovsky, S.H. Edwards, A. Kumar, L. Malmi, L. Benotti, D. Buck, P. Ihantola, R. Prince, T. Sirki"a, S. Sosnovsky, J. Urquiza, A. Vihavainen, and M. Wollowski. 2014. Increasing Adoption of Smart Learning Content for Computer Science Education. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education Conference (ITiCSE-WGR '14). 31--57.
6. A.T. Chamillard. 2011. Using a Student Response System in CS1 and CS2. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '11). 299--304.
7. B. Cheanga, A. Kurniaa, A. Limb, and W.C. Oonc. 2002. On automated grading of programming assignments in an academic institution. Computers & Education, 121--131. Issue 41.
8. S.H. Edwards. 2004. Using software testing to move students from trial-and-error to reflection-in-action. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '04). 26--30.
9. S.H. Edwards, J. Snyder, M.A. Pérez-Qui nones, A. Allevato, K. Dongkwan, and B. Tretola. 2009. Comparing Effective and Ineffective Behaviors of Student Programmers. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computing Education and Research (ICER '09). 3--14.
10. J.V. Ernst, B.D. Bowen, and T.O. Williams. 2016. Freshman Engineering Students At-Risk Of Non-Matriculation: Self-Efficacy For Academic Learning. American Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 7 (June 2016), 9--18.
11. E. Fouh, M. Akbar, and C.A. Shaffer. 2012. The Role of Visualization in Computer Science Education. Computers in the Schools, Vol. 29 (2012), 95--117. Issue 1--2.
12. D.D. Garcia, L. Aaronson, S. Kenner, C. Lewis, and S. Rodger. 2016. Technology We Can't Live Without!, Revisited. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (SIGCSE '16). 236--237.
13. P. Ihantola, A. Vihavainen, A. Ahadi, M. Butler, J. Börstler, S.H. Edwards, E. Isohanni, A. Korhonen, A. Petersen, K. Rivers, M.Á. Rubio, J. Sheard, B. Skupas, J. Spacco, C. Szabo, and D. Toll. 2015. Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Programming: Literature Review and Case Studies. In Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports (ITICSE-WGR '15). 41--63.
14. R. Ishizue, K. Sakamoto, H. Washizaki, and Y. Fukazawa. 2018. PVC: Visualizing C Programs on Web Browsers for Novices. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '18). 245--250.
15. A.N. Kumar. 2008. The Effect of Using Problem-solving Software Tutors on the Self-confidence of Female Students. SIGCSE Bull., Vol. 40, 1 (March 2008), 523--527.
16. R.B. Levy and M. Ben-Ari. 2007. We Work So Hard and They Don'T Use It: Acceptance of Software Tools by Teachers. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 246--250.
17. R.B. Levy and M. Ben-Ari. 2008. Perceived behavior control and its influence on the adoption of software tools. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE '08). ACM, 169--173.
18. T. Naps, S. Cooper, B. Koldehofe, C. Leska, G. Rößling, W. Dann, A. Korhonen, L. Malmi, J. Rantakokko, R.J. Ross, J. Anderson, R. Fleischer, M. Kuittinen, and M. McNally. 2003. Evaluation the educational impact of visualization. In Working Group Reports from the Symposium on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE-WGR '03). 124--136.
19. C.A. Shaffer, M.L. Cooper, A.J.D. Alon, M. Akbar, M. Stewart, S. Ponce, and S.H. Edwards. 2010. Algorithm Visualization: The State of the Field. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, Vol. 10 (August 2010), 1--22.
20. C. Watson and F.W.B. Li. 2014. Failure Rates in Introductory Programming Revisited. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '14). 39--44.
21. C. Wilcox. 2015. The Role of Automation in Undergraduate Computer Science Education. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '15). 90--95.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing education

      • Computing education programs

        • Computer science education