Charles E. Perkins
- {1} P. Calhoun and A. Rubens, "DIAMETER Base Protocol," draft-calhoun-diameter-07.txt, Nov. 1998. (work in progress).Google Scholar
- {2} S. Glass and S. J. et.al, "Mobile IP Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting Requirements," draft-ietf-aaa-mobile-ip-req-00.txt, June 1999. (work in progress). Google ScholarDigital Library
- {3} V. Gupta, "Inline security parameter payload for mobile IP" draft-gupta-mobileip-inline-secparams-00.txt, June 1999. (work in progress).Google Scholar
- {4} S. Hanks, T. Li, D. Farinacci, and P. Traina, "Generic Routing Encapsulation over IPv4 networks," RFC 1702, Oct. 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {5} P. McCann and T. Hiller, "IP transform policy distribution using mobile IP/DIAMETER," draft-mccanntransform-00.txt, June 1999. (work in progress).Google Scholar
- {6} T. Narten, E. Nordmark, and W. Simpson, "RFC 2461: Neighbor discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6)," Dec. 1998, Status: DRAFT STANDARD. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {7} C. Perkins, "IP Encapsulation within IP," RFC 2003, May 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {8} C. Perkins, "Minimal Encapsulation within IP" RFC 2004, May 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- {9} C. E. Perkins, G. Montenegro, and P. R. Calhoun, "Private addresses in mobile IR" draft-ietf-mobileip-privaddr-00.txt, June 1999. (work in progress).Google Scholar
- {10} C. Perkins, Editor, "IP Mobility Support," RFC 2002, Oct. 1996.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Mobile IP and the IETF
Recommendations
Mobile IP and the IETF
This is a report from your faithful IETF correspondent, covering some of the relevant events at the 42nd IETF conference in Chicago, IL. Milestones were reached, and promising new developments are taking shape. Chief among the milestones was the passage ...
Multicast support for mobile hosts using mobile IP: design issues and proposed architecture
Special issue: mobile networking in the InternetIn this paper, we consider the problem of providing multicast to mobile hosts using Mobile IP for network routing support. Providing multicast in an internetwork with mobile hosts is made difficult because many multicast protocols are inefficient when ...
Quantitative analysis of enhanced mobile IP
As the popularity of mobile computing grows, the associated protocols and their scalability are subject to much closer scrutiny. Mobile IP relies heavily on the use of IP-to-IP tunneling, requiring 20 bytes of overhead for every packet routed to or from ...
Comments