skip to main content
10.1145/3291940.3291990acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

The research of MIMO-FBMC in underwater acoustic communication

Published:03 December 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

In underwater acoustic channels with long time-delay, Alamouti space-time coded OFDM communication systems show poor performance, which is mainly caused by the unflat topology of the subband of severely frequency-selective channels. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a MIMO-FBMC system based on a subband cutting method. This scheme improves the performance of Alamouti space-time coded OFDM systems in underwater acoustic communication in the following aspects: First, FBMC modulation is introduced to reduce out-of-band leakage through a re-designed window. Besides, FBMC modulation can also increase spectral efficiency because it does not need extra cyclic prefix. Second, the subband cutting method provides more stable bit error performance, benefited from the nonoverlapping feature of channel effect. According to our simulation results for the Alamouti space-time coded OFDM system and subband cutting based MIMO-FBMC system, the latter can achieve better performance, especially in long time-delay underwater acoustic channels.

References

  1. Helmut Bölcskei. 2003. Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Based on Offset QAM. Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 321--352.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A. Cano-Gutierrez, M. Stojanovic, and J. Vidal. 2004. Effect of channel estimation error on the performance of SVD-based MIMO communication systems. In 2004 IEEE 15th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8754), Vol. 1. 508--512 Vol.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. R. W. Chang. 1966. Synthesis of band-limited orthogonal signals for multichannel data transmission. The Bell System Technical Journal 45, 10 (Dec 1966), 1775--1796.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. L. R. LeBlanc and P. . J. Beaujean. 2000. Spatio-temporal processing of coherent acoustic communications data in shallow water. In OCEANS 2000 MTS, Vol. 3. 1625--1631 vol.3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. B. Li, S. Zhou, M. Stojanovic, and L. Freitag. 2006. Pilot-tone based ZP-OFDM Demodulation for an Underwater Acoustic Channel. In OCEANS 2006. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Melodia, D. Pompili, V. C. Gungor, and I. F. Akyildiz. 2007. Communication and Coordination in Wireless Sensor and Actor Networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 6, 10 (Oct 2007), 1116--1129. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. R. Nissel, J. Blumenstein, and M. Rupp. 2017. Block frequency spreading: A method for low-complexity MIMO in FBMC-OQAM. In 2017 IEEE 18th International Workshop on SPAWC. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Nissel, S. Schwarz, and M. Rupp. 2017. Filter Bank Multicarrier Modulation Schemes for Future Mobile Communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 35, 8 (Aug 2017), 1768--1782.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. F. Ormondroyd. 2007. A Robust Underwater Acoustic Communication System using OFDM-MIMO. In OCEANS 2007 - Europe. 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. R. F. Ormondroyd and J. S. Dhanoa. 2005. Comparison of space-time block code and layered space-time MIMO systems for an underwater acoustic channel. In Europe Oceans 2005, Vol. 1. 255--260 Vol. 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Roy, T. Duman, L. Ghazikhanian, V. McDonald, J. Proakis, and J. Zeidler. 2004. Enhanced underwater acoustic communication performance using space-time coding and processing. In Oceans '04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean '04 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37600), Vol. 1. 26--33 Vol.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. B. Saltzberg. 1967. Performance of an Efficient Parallel Data Transmission System. IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology 15, 6 (December 1967), 805--811.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. P. Siohan, C. Siclet, and N. Lacaille. 2002. Analysis and design of OFDM/OQAM systems based on filterbank theory. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 50, 5 (May 2002), 1170--1183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. François-Xavier Socheleau, Antony Pottier, and Christophe Laot. 2016. Watermark: bch1 Dataset Description. (Nov. 2016). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01404491 working paper or preprint.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. M. Stojanovic. 2009. MIMO OFDM over underwater acoustic channels. In 2009 Conference Record of the Forty-Third Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers. 605--609. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. M. Vajapeyam, U. Mitra, J. Preisig, and M. Stojanovic. 2006. Distributed Space-Time Cooperative Schemes for Underwater Acoustic Communications. In OCEANS 2006 - Asia Pacific. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    WUWNet '18: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Underwater Networks & Systems
    December 2018
    261 pages
    ISBN:9781450361934
    DOI:10.1145/3291940

    Copyright © 2018 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 3 December 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper

    Acceptance Rates

    WUWNet '18 Paper Acceptance Rate11of23submissions,48%Overall Acceptance Rate84of180submissions,47%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)8
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader