skip to main content
10.1145/3292500.3330758acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Actions Speak Louder than Goals: Valuing Player Actions in Soccer

Published:25 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Assessing the impact of the individual actions performed by soccer players during games is a crucial aspect of the player recruitment process. Unfortunately, most traditional metrics fall short in addressing this task as they either focus on rare actions like shots and goals alone or fail to account for the context in which the actions occurred. This paper introduces (1) a new language for describing individual player actions on the pitch and (2) a framework for valuing any type of player action based on its impact on the game outcome while accounting for the context in which the action happened. By aggregating soccer players' action values, their total offensive and defensive contributions to their team can be quantified. We show how our approach considers relevant contextual information that traditional player evaluation metrics ignore and present a number of use cases related to scouting and playing style characterization in the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 seasons in Europe's top competitions.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p1851-decroos.mp4

mp4

1.2 GB

References

  1. Daniel Altman. 2015. Beyond Shots: A New Approach to Quantifying Scoring Opportunities. (2015). http://northyardanalytics.com/Dan-Altman-NYA-OptaPro-Forum-2015.pdf OptaPro Analytics Forum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Lotte Bransen, Pieter Robberechts, Jan Van Haaren, and Jesse Davis. 2019 a. Choke or Shine? Quantifying Soccer Playersrq Abilities to Perform Under Mental Pressure. In MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Lotte Bransen and Jan Van Haaren. 2018. Measuring Football Playersrq On-the-Ball Contributions from Passes During Games. In ECML/PKDD 2018 Workshop on Machine Learning and Data Mining for Sports Analytics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Lotte Bransen, Jan Van Haaren, and Michel van de Velden. 2019 b. Measuring Soccer Playersrq Contributions to Chance Creation by Valuing Their Passes. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael Caley. 2015. Premier League Projections and New Expected Goals . (2015). https://cartilagefreecaptain.sbnation.com/2015/10/19/9295905/premier-league-projections-and-new-expected-goals Cartilage Free Captain.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dan Cervone, Alexander D'Amour, Luke Bornn, and Kirk Goldsberry. 2014. POINTWISE: Predicting Points and Valuing Decisions in Real Time with NBA Optical Tracking Data. In MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Tianqi Chen and Carlos Guestrin. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 785--794. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Tom Decroos, Vladimir Dzyuba, Jan Van Haaren, and Jesse Davis. 2017a. Predicting Soccer Highlights from Spatio-Temporal Match Event Streams. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1302--1308. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Tom Decroos, Jan Van Haaren, and Jesse Davis. 2018. Automatic Discovery of Tactics in Spatio-Temporal Soccer Match Data. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tom Decroos, Jan Van Haaren, Vladimir Dzyuba, and Jesse Davis. 2017b. STARSS: A Spatio-temporal Action Rating System for Soccer. In ECML/PKDD 2017 Workshop on Machine Learning and Data Mining for Sports Analytics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Javier Fernández, Luke Bornn, and Dan Cervone. 2019. Decomposing the Immeasurable Sport: A Deep Learning Expected Possession Value Framework for Soccer. In MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. César Ferri, José Hernández-Orallo, and R. Modroiu. 2009. An Experimental Comparison of Performance Measures for Classification . Pattern Recognition Letters , Vol. 30, 1 (2009), 27--38. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Keith Goldner. 2012. A Markov Model of Football: Using Stochastic Processes to Model a Football Drive . Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports , Vol. 8, 1 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sam Gregory. 2017. How We Assign Credit in Football . (2017). http://www.optasportspro.com/about/optapro-blog/posts/2017/blog-how-we-assign-credit-in-football/ OptaPro Blog.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. László Gyarmati and Rade Stanojevic. 2016. QPass: A Merit-based Evaluation of Soccer Passes. In KDD 2016 Workshop on Large-Scale Sports Analytics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Nobuyoshi Hirotsu, Michael Wright, et almbox. 2002. Using a Markov Process Model of an Association Football Match to Determine the Optimal Timing of Substitution and Tactical Decisions . Journal of the Operational Research Society , Vol. 53, 1 (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ted Knutson. 2017. Introducing xGChain. (2017). http://www.statsbombservices.com/introducing-xgchain StatsBomb IQ Services.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Michael Littman. 1994. Markov Games as a Framework for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Guiliang Liu and Oliver Schulte. 2018. Deep Reinforcement Learning in Ice Hockey for Context-Aware Player Evaluation. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3442--3448. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Patrick Lucey, Alina Bialkowski, Mathew Monfort, Peter Carr, and Iain Matthews. 2014. Quality vs. Quantity: Improved Shot Prediction in Soccer Using Strategic Features from Spatiotemporal Data. In MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Nils Mackay. {n.d.}. Predicting Goal Probabilities for Possessions in Football. Master's thesis. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Alexandru Niculescu-Mizil and Rich Caruana. 2005. Predicting Good Probabilities with Supervised Learning. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Machine Learning. 625--632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Olav Nørstebø , Vegard Rødseth Bjertnes, and Eirik Vabo. 2016. Valuing Individual Player Involvements in Norwegian Association Football. Master's thesis. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Luca Pappalardo, Paolo Cintia, et almbox. 2018. PlayeRank: data-driven performance evaluation and player ranking in soccer via a machine learning approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.04987 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, et almbox. 2011. scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python . Journal of Machine Learning Research , Vol. 12, Oct (2011), 2825--2830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Liudmila Prokhorenkova, Gleb Gusev, Aleksandr Vorobev, Anna Veronika Dorogush, and Andrey Gulin. 2018. CatBoost: Unbiased Boosting with Categorical Features. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 6639--6649. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kurt Routley and Oliver Schulte. 2015. A Markov Game Model for Valuing Player Actions in Ice Hockey. In Proceedings of the Thirty-First Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence . 782--791. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Sarah Rudd. 2011. A Framework for Tactical Analysis and Individual Offensive Production Assessment in Soccer Using Markov Chains. In New England Symposium on Statistics in Sports. http://nessis.org/nessis11/rudd.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Tom Tango, Mitchel Lichtman, and Andrew Dolphin. 2007. The Book: Playing the Percentages in Baseball. Potomac Books, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '19: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
    July 2019
    3305 pages
    ISBN:9781450362016
    DOI:10.1145/3292500

    Copyright © 2019 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 25 July 2019

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

    Acceptance Rates

    KDD '19 Paper Acceptance Rate110of1,200submissions,9%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

    Upcoming Conference

    KDD '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader