skip to main content
10.1145/3301275.3302274acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Honorable Mention

The effect of explanations and algorithmic accuracy on visual recommender systems of artistic images

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

There are very few works about explaining content-based recommendations of images in the artistic domain. Current works do not provide a perspective of the many variables involved in the user perception of several aspects of the system such as domain knowledge, relevance, explainability, and trust. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by studying three interfaces, with different levels of explainability, for artistic image recommendation. Our experiments with N=121 users confirm that explanations of recommendations in the image domain are useful and increase user satisfaction, perception of explainability and relevance. Furthermore, our results show that the observed effects are also dependent on the underlying recommendation algorithm used. We tested two algorithms: Deep Neural Networks (DNN), which has high accuracy, and Attractiveness Visual Features (AVF) with high transparency but lower accuracy. Our results indicate that algorithms should not be studied in isolation, but rather in conjunction with interfaces, since both play a significant role in the perception of explainability and trust for image recommendation. Finally, using the framework by Knijnenburg et al., we provide a comprehensive model which synthesizes the effects between different variables involved in the user experience with explainable visual recommender systems of artistic images.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

p408-dominguez.mp4

mp4

649.5 MB

References

  1. Xavier Amatriain. 2013. Mining large streams of user data for personalized recommendations. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 14, 2 (2013), 37--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ivana Andjelkovic, Denis Parra, and John O'Donovan. 2018. Moodplay: Interactive music recommendation based on Artists' mood similarity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. LM Aroyo, Y Wang, R Brussee, Peter Gorgels, LW Rutledge, and N Stash. 2007. Personalized museum experience: The Rijksmuseum use case. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Idir Benouaret and Dominique Lenne. 2015. Personalizing the Museum Experience through Context-Aware Recommendations. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). 743--748.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bruno Cardoso, Gayane Sedrakyan, Francisco Gutiérrez, Denis Parra, Peter Brusilovsky, and Katrien Verbert. 2019. IntersectionExplorer, a multi-perspective approach for exploring recommendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 121 (2019), 73--92.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Oscar Celma. 2010. Music recommendation. In Music Recommendation and Discovery. Springer, 43--85. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Anjan Chatterjee, Page Widick, Rebecca Sternschein, WilliamSmith II, and Bianca Bromberger. 2010. The Assessment of Art Attributes. 28 (07 2010), 207--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 248--255.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Vicente Dominguez, Pablo Messina, Denis Parra, Domingo Mery, Christoph Trattner, and Alvaro Soto. 2017. Comparing Neural and Attractiveness-based Visual Features for Artwork Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Deep Learning for Recommender Systems, co-located at RecSys 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Vicente Dominguez, Pablo Messina, Christoph Trattner, and Denis Parra. 2018. Towards Explanations for Visual Recommender Systems of Artistic Images. In Proceedings of the 5th Joint Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems. 69--73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ivania Donoso-Guzmán and Denis Parra. 2018. An Interactive Relevance Feedback Interface for Evidence-Based Health Care. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 103--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. David Elsweiler, Christoph Trattner, and Morgan Harvey. 2017. Exploiting food choice biases for healthier recipe recommendation. In Proceedings of the 40th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 575--584. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hao Fang, Saurabh Gupta, Forrest Iandola, Rupesh Srivastava, Li Deng, Piotr Dollár, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong He, Margaret Mitchell, John Platt, and others. 2015. From captions to visual concepts and back. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerhard Friedrich and Markus Zanker. 2011. A taxonomy for generating explanations in recommender systems. AI Magazine 32, 3 (2011), 90--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Leon A Gatys, Alexander S Ecker, and Matthias Bethge. 2016. Image style transfer using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2414--2423.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fatih Gedikli, Dietmar Jannach, and Mouzhi Ge. 2014. How should I explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 4 (2014), 367 -- 382. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Carlos A Gomez-Uribe and Neil Hunt. 2016. The netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 6, 4 (2016), 13. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139--183.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen He, Denis Parra, and Katrien Verbert. 2016b. Interactive recommender systems: A survey of the state of the art and future research challenges and opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications 56 (2016), 9--27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Ruining He, Chen Fang, Zhaowen Wang, and Julian McAuley. 2016a. Vista: A Visually, Socially, and Temporally-aware Model for Artistic Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 309--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Lisa Anne Hendricks, Zeynep Akata, Marcus Rohrbach, Jeff Donahue, Bernt Schiele, and Trevor Darrell. 2016. Generating visual explanations. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 3--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl. 2000. Explaining Collaborative Filtering Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 241--250. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Litze Hu and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6, 1 (1999), 1--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Bart P. Knijnenburg, Martijn C. Willemsen, Zeno Gantner, Hakan Soncu, and Chris Newell. 2012. Explaining the User Experience of Recommender Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (2012), 441--504. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Joseph A Konstan and John Riedl. 2012. Recommender systems: from algorithms to user experience. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1-2 (2012), 101--123. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pigi Kouki, Shobeir Fakhraei, James Foulds, Magdalini Eirinaki, and Lise Getoor. 2015. Hyper: A flexible and extensible probabilistic framework for hybrid recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 99--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pigi Kouki, James Schaffer, Jay Pujara, John O'Donovan, and Lise Getoor. 2017. User preferences for hybrid explanations. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 84--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 1097--1105. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pattie Maes and others. 1994. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Commun. ACM 37, 7 (1994), 30--40. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Sean M McNee, Nishikant Kapoor, and Joseph A Konstan. 2006. Don't look stupid: avoiding pitfalls when recommending research papers. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 171--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Pablo Messina, Vicente Dominguez, Denis Parra, Christoph Trattner, and Alvaro Soto. 2018. Content-Based Artwork Recommendation: Integrating Painting Metadata with Neural and Manually-Engineered Visual Features. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Margaret Mitchell, Xufeng Han, Jesse Dodge, Alyssa Mensch, Amit Goyal, Alex Berg, Kota Yamaguchi, Tamara Berg, Karl Stratos, and Hal Daumé, III. 2012. Midge: Generating Image Descriptions from Computer Vision Detections. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL '12). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 747--756. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2380816.2380907 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Cataldo Musto, Fedelucio Narducci, Pasquale Lops, Marco De Gemmis, and Giovanni Semeraro. 2016. ExpLOD: A Framework for Explaining Recommendations Based on the Linked Open Data Cloud. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151--154. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Chris Olah, Alexander Mordvintsev, and Ludwig Schubert. 2017. Feature Visualization. Distill (2017). https://distill.pub/2017/feature-visualization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Denis Parra and Peter Brusilovsky. 2015. User-controllable personalization: A case study with SetFusion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 78 (2015), 43--67. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Jose San Pedro and Stefan Siersdorfer. 2009. Ranking and Classifying Attractiveness of Photos in Folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 771--780. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Giovanni Semeraro, Pasquale Lops, Marco De Gemmis, Cataldo Musto, and Fedelucio Narducci. 2012. A folksonomy-based recommender system for personalized access to digital artworks. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) 5, 3 (2012), 11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ali Sharif Razavian, Hossein Azizpour, Josephine Sullivan, and Stefan Carlsson. 2014. CNN features off-the-shelf: an astounding baseline for recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 806--813. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Nava Tintarev and Judith Masthoff. 2015. Explaining recommendations: Design and evaluation. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 353--382.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Chun-Hua Tsai and Peter Brusilovsky. 2018. Explaining Social Recommendations to Casual Users: Design Principles and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion (IUI '18 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 59, 2 pages. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Egon L van den Broek, Thijs Kok, Theo E Schouten, and Eduard Hoenkamp. 2006. Multimedia for art retrieval (m4art). In Multimedia Content Analysis, Management, and Retrieval 2006, Vol. 6073. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 60730Z.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Katrien Verbert, Denis Parra, Peter Brusilovsky, and Erik Duval. 2013. Visualizing recommendations to support exploration, transparency and controllability. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 351--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Jesse Vig, Shilad Sen, and John Riedl. 2009. Tagsplanations: Explaining Recommendations Using Tags. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Deborah Weinswig. 2016. Art Market Cooling, But Online Sales Booming. https://www.forbes.com/sites/deborahweinswig/2016/05/13/art-market-cooling-but-online-sales-booming/. (2016). {Online; accessed 21-March-2017}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The effect of explanations and algorithmic accuracy on visual recommender systems of artistic images

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            IUI '19: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces
            March 2019
            713 pages
            ISBN:9781450362726
            DOI:10.1145/3301275

            Copyright © 2019 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 17 March 2019

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            IUI '19 Paper Acceptance Rate71of282submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate746of2,811submissions,27%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader