ABSTRACT
There are very few works about explaining content-based recommendations of images in the artistic domain. Current works do not provide a perspective of the many variables involved in the user perception of several aspects of the system such as domain knowledge, relevance, explainability, and trust. In this paper, we aim to fill this gap by studying three interfaces, with different levels of explainability, for artistic image recommendation. Our experiments with N=121 users confirm that explanations of recommendations in the image domain are useful and increase user satisfaction, perception of explainability and relevance. Furthermore, our results show that the observed effects are also dependent on the underlying recommendation algorithm used. We tested two algorithms: Deep Neural Networks (DNN), which has high accuracy, and Attractiveness Visual Features (AVF) with high transparency but lower accuracy. Our results indicate that algorithms should not be studied in isolation, but rather in conjunction with interfaces, since both play a significant role in the perception of explainability and trust for image recommendation. Finally, using the framework by Knijnenburg et al., we provide a comprehensive model which synthesizes the effects between different variables involved in the user experience with explainable visual recommender systems of artistic images.
Supplemental Material
- Xavier Amatriain. 2013. Mining large streams of user data for personalized recommendations. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 14, 2 (2013), 37--48. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ivana Andjelkovic, Denis Parra, and John O'Donovan. 2018. Moodplay: Interactive music recommendation based on Artists' mood similarity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (2018).Google Scholar
- LM Aroyo, Y Wang, R Brussee, Peter Gorgels, LW Rutledge, and N Stash. 2007. Personalized museum experience: The Rijksmuseum use case. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web.Google Scholar
- Idir Benouaret and Dominique Lenne. 2015. Personalizing the Museum Experience through Context-Aware Recommendations. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). 743--748.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bruno Cardoso, Gayane Sedrakyan, Francisco Gutiérrez, Denis Parra, Peter Brusilovsky, and Katrien Verbert. 2019. IntersectionExplorer, a multi-perspective approach for exploring recommendations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 121 (2019), 73--92.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oscar Celma. 2010. Music recommendation. In Music Recommendation and Discovery. Springer, 43--85. Google Scholar
- Anjan Chatterjee, Page Widick, Rebecca Sternschein, WilliamSmith II, and Bianca Bromberger. 2010. The Assessment of Art Attributes. 28 (07 2010), 207--222.Google Scholar
- Jia Deng, Wei Dong, Richard Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei. 2009. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 248--255.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vicente Dominguez, Pablo Messina, Denis Parra, Domingo Mery, Christoph Trattner, and Alvaro Soto. 2017. Comparing Neural and Attractiveness-based Visual Features for Artwork Recommendation. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Deep Learning for Recommender Systems, co-located at RecSys 2017. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vicente Dominguez, Pablo Messina, Christoph Trattner, and Denis Parra. 2018. Towards Explanations for Visual Recommender Systems of Artistic Images. In Proceedings of the 5th Joint Workshop on Interfaces and Human Decision Making for Recommender Systems. 69--73.Google Scholar
- Ivania Donoso-Guzmán and Denis Parra. 2018. An Interactive Relevance Feedback Interface for Evidence-Based Health Care. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 103--114. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Elsweiler, Christoph Trattner, and Morgan Harvey. 2017. Exploiting food choice biases for healthier recipe recommendation. In Proceedings of the 40th international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 575--584. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hao Fang, Saurabh Gupta, Forrest Iandola, Rupesh Srivastava, Li Deng, Piotr Dollár, Jianfeng Gao, Xiaodong He, Margaret Mitchell, John Platt, and others. 2015. From captions to visual concepts and back. (2015).Google Scholar
- Gerhard Friedrich and Markus Zanker. 2011. A taxonomy for generating explanations in recommender systems. AI Magazine 32, 3 (2011), 90--98.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Leon A Gatys, Alexander S Ecker, and Matthias Bethge. 2016. Image style transfer using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2414--2423.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fatih Gedikli, Dietmar Jannach, and Mouzhi Ge. 2014. How should I explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 4 (2014), 367 -- 382. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/ Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carlos A Gomez-Uribe and Neil Hunt. 2016. The netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS) 6, 4 (2016), 13. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, 139--183.Google Scholar
- Chen He, Denis Parra, and Katrien Verbert. 2016b. Interactive recommender systems: A survey of the state of the art and future research challenges and opportunities. Expert Systems with Applications 56 (2016), 9--27. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ruining He, Chen Fang, Zhaowen Wang, and Julian McAuley. 2016a. Vista: A Visually, Socially, and Temporally-aware Model for Artistic Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 309--316. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lisa Anne Hendricks, Zeynep Akata, Marcus Rohrbach, Jeff Donahue, Bernt Schiele, and Trevor Darrell. 2016. Generating visual explanations. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 3--19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jonathan L. Herlocker, Joseph A. Konstan, and John Riedl. 2000. Explaining Collaborative Filtering Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '00). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 241--250. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Litze Hu and Peter M. Bentler. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6, 1 (1999), 1--55.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bart P. Knijnenburg, Martijn C. Willemsen, Zeno Gantner, Hakan Soncu, and Chris Newell. 2012. Explaining the User Experience of Recommender Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (2012), 441--504. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph A Konstan and John Riedl. 2012. Recommender systems: from algorithms to user experience. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 1-2 (2012), 101--123. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pigi Kouki, Shobeir Fakhraei, James Foulds, Magdalini Eirinaki, and Lise Getoor. 2015. Hyper: A flexible and extensible probabilistic framework for hybrid recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 99--106. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pigi Kouki, James Schaffer, Jay Pujara, John O'Donovan, and Lise Getoor. 2017. User preferences for hybrid explanations. In Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 84--88. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. 2012. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 1097--1105. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pattie Maes and others. 1994. Agents that reduce work and information overload. Commun. ACM 37, 7 (1994), 30--40. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sean M McNee, Nishikant Kapoor, and Joseph A Konstan. 2006. Don't look stupid: avoiding pitfalls when recommending research papers. In Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 171--180. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pablo Messina, Vicente Dominguez, Denis Parra, Christoph Trattner, and Alvaro Soto. 2018. Content-Based Artwork Recommendation: Integrating Painting Metadata with Neural and Manually-Engineered Visual Features. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (2018).Google Scholar
- Margaret Mitchell, Xufeng Han, Jesse Dodge, Alyssa Mensch, Amit Goyal, Alex Berg, Kota Yamaguchi, Tamara Berg, Karl Stratos, and Hal Daumé, III. 2012. Midge: Generating Image Descriptions from Computer Vision Detections. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL '12). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 747--756. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2380816.2380907 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cataldo Musto, Fedelucio Narducci, Pasquale Lops, Marco De Gemmis, and Giovanni Semeraro. 2016. ExpLOD: A Framework for Explaining Recommendations Based on the Linked Open Data Cloud. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 151--154. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris Olah, Alexander Mordvintsev, and Ludwig Schubert. 2017. Feature Visualization. Distill (2017). https://distill.pub/2017/feature-visualization.Google Scholar
- Denis Parra and Peter Brusilovsky. 2015. User-controllable personalization: A case study with SetFusion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 78 (2015), 43--67. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jose San Pedro and Stefan Siersdorfer. 2009. Ranking and Classifying Attractiveness of Photos in Folksonomies. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 771--780. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Giovanni Semeraro, Pasquale Lops, Marco De Gemmis, Cataldo Musto, and Fedelucio Narducci. 2012. A folksonomy-based recommender system for personalized access to digital artworks. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (JOCCH) 5, 3 (2012), 11. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ali Sharif Razavian, Hossein Azizpour, Josephine Sullivan, and Stefan Carlsson. 2014. CNN features off-the-shelf: an astounding baseline for recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops. 806--813. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nava Tintarev and Judith Masthoff. 2015. Explaining recommendations: Design and evaluation. In Recommender Systems Handbook. Springer, 353--382.Google Scholar
- Chun-Hua Tsai and Peter Brusilovsky. 2018. Explaining Social Recommendations to Casual Users: Design Principles and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion (IUI '18 Companion). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 59, 2 pages. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Egon L van den Broek, Thijs Kok, Theo E Schouten, and Eduard Hoenkamp. 2006. Multimedia for art retrieval (m4art). In Multimedia Content Analysis, Management, and Retrieval 2006, Vol. 6073. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 60730Z.Google Scholar
- Katrien Verbert, Denis Parra, Peter Brusilovsky, and Erik Duval. 2013. Visualizing recommendations to support exploration, transparency and controllability. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 351--362. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jesse Vig, Shilad Sen, and John Riedl. 2009. Tagsplanations: Explaining Recommendations Using Tags. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '09). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 47--56. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deborah Weinswig. 2016. Art Market Cooling, But Online Sales Booming. https://www.forbes.com/sites/deborahweinswig/2016/05/13/art-market-cooling-but-online-sales-booming/. (2016). {Online; accessed 21-March-2017}.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The effect of explanations and algorithmic accuracy on visual recommender systems of artistic images
Recommendations
Personalized explanations for hybrid recommender systems
IUI '19: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Intelligent User InterfacesRecommender systems have become pervasive on the web, shaping the way users see information and thus the decisions they make. As these systems get more complex, there is a growing need for transparency. In this paper, we study the problem of generating ...
Counterfactual Explanations for Visual Recommender Systems
WWW '24: Companion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024Users rely on clever recommendations for items they might like to buy, and service providers rely on clever recommender systems to ensure that their product is recommended to their target audience. Providing explanations for recommendations helps to ...
Algorithmic and HCI Aspects for Explaining Recommendations of Artistic Images
Special Issue on IUI 2019 HighlightsExplaining suggestions made by recommendation systems is key to make users trust and accept these systems. This is specially critical in areas such as art image recommendation. Traditionally, artworks are sold in galleries where people can see them ...
Comments