ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Predicting text entry speed on mobile phones
Full text PdfPdf (849 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
The Hague, The Netherlands
Pages: 9 - 16  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-216-6
Authors
Miika Silfverberg  Nokia Research Center, P.O. Box 407, FIN-00045 Nokia Group, Finland
I. Scott MacKenzie  Dept. of Mathematics & Statistics, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3
Panu Korhonen  Nokia Research Center, P.O. Box 407, FIN-00045 Nokia Group, Finland
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 48,   Downloads (12 Months): 264,   Citation Count: 45
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/332040.332044
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a model for predicting expert text entry rates for several input methods on a 12-key mobile phone keypad. The model includes a movement component based on Fitts' law and a linguistic component based on digraph, or letter-pair, probabilities. Predictions are provided for one-handed thumb and two-handed index finger input. For the traditional multi-press method or the lesser-used two-key method, predicted expert rates vary from about 21 to 27 words per minute (wpm). The relatively new T9 method works with a disambiguating algorithm and inputs each character with a single key press. Predicted expert rates vary from 41 wpm for one-handed thumb input to 46 wpm for two-handed index finger input. These figures are degraded somewhat depending on the user's strategy in coping with less-than-perfect disambiguation. Analyses of these strategies are presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bellman, T., and MacKenzie, I. S. A probabilistic character layout strategy for mobile text entry, Proc of Graphics Interface '98. Toronto: CIPS, 1998, 168-176.
 
2
 
3
 
4
Drury, C. G., and Hoffmann, E. R. A model for movement time on data-entry keyboards, Ergonomics 35 (1992), 129-147.
 
5
Epps, B. W. Comparison of six cursor control devices based on Fitts' law models, Proc Human Factors Society. Santa Monica, CA: HFS, 1986, 327-331.
 
6
Fitts, P. M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement, Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (1954), 381-391.
 
7
(}an, K.-C., and Hoffmann, E. R. Geometrical conditions for ballistic and visually controlled movements, Ergonomics 31 (1988), 829-839.
 
8
Grover, D. L., King, M. T., and Kuschler, C. A. Patent No. US5818437, Reduced keyboard disambiguating computer. Tegic Communications, Inc., Seattle, WA (1998).
 
9
ISO/IEC 9995-8. Information systems - Keyboard layouts for text and office systems - Part 8: Allocation of letters to the keys of a numeric keypad, International Organisation for Standardisation, 1994.
 
10
MacKenzie, I. S. Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction, Human-Computer Interaction 7 (1992), 91-139.
11
12
13
 
14
Martin, G. L. Configuring a numeric keypad for a touch screen, Ergonomics 31 (1988), 945-953.
 
15
Soukoreff, W., and MacKenzie, I. S. Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speeds using a stylus and keyboard, Behaviour & Information Technology 14 (1995), 370-379.

CITED BY  47
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Miika Silfverberg: colleagues
I. Scott MacKenzie: colleagues
Panu Korhonen: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: