ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A comparison of tools for building GOMS models
Full text PdfPdf (1.02 MB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
The Hague, The Netherlands
Pages: 502 - 509  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-216-6
Authors
Lynn K. Baumeister  HCI Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Bonnie E. John  HCI Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Michael D. Byrne  Department of Psychology, Rice University, Houston, TX
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 73,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/332040.332485
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We compare three tools for creating GOMS models, QGOMS [2), CATHCI (17) and GLEAN3 [12], along several dimensions. We examine the representation and available constructs in each tool, the qualitative and quantitative design information provided, the support for building cognitively plausible models, and pragmatics about using each tool (e.g., how easy it is to modify a model). While each tool has its strengths, they all leave something to be desired as a practical UI design tool.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Lawrence.
 
2
Beard, David V., Smith, Dana K. & Denelsbeck, Kevin M. (1996). "Quick and Dirty GOMS: A Case Study of Computed Tomography", Human-Computer Interaction, 11 (2), 157-180.
 
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
 
10
Kieras, D. E. (1988). Towards a practical GOMS model methodology for user interface design. In M. Helander (Ed.), The handbook of human-computer interaction. (pp. 135-158). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
11
12
 
13
Kirwan, B., & Ainsworth, L. K. (1992). A Guide to Task Analysis. London: Taylor and Francis.
 
14
 
15
Lewis, C. & Rieman, J. (1994). Task-centered User Interface Design: A Practical lintroduction. Shareware book at ftp.cs.colorado.edu/pub/cs/distribs/clewis/HCI- Design-Book.
 
16
Pew, R. W., & Mavor, A. S. (1998)i Modeling human and organizational behavior: Application to military simulations. Washington, DC" National Academy Press.
 
17
Williams, K. E. (1993) Automating the cognitive task modeling process: An extension to GOMS for HCI. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction Poster Sessions: Abridged Proceedings (vol 3. p. 182).

CITED BY  7
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Lynn K. Baumeister: colleagues
Bonnie E. John: colleagues
Michael D. Byrne: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: