skip to main content
10.1145/3352411.3352422acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdsitConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Exploring the Prediction of Variety-seeking Behavior

Authors Info & Claims
Published:19 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

As a common choice strategy for consumers, variety-seeking has a direct impact on the business performance of enterprises, and has been studied for decades in management science and marketing research. Existing research tends to find factors which influence variety-seeking by means of questionnaires and laboratory experiments. Based on the important factors, marketers develop marketing plans which are tailored to consumers. However, due to personal motivation, the results of questionnaires and laboratory experiments may not fully reflect internal states of participants. Thus, we propose a data-driven framework, using ensemble learning for predicting variety-seeking behavior based on real student consumption data. Experiments demonstrate that our model outperforms separate machine learning algorithms and can effectively predict variety-seeking behavior. We further analyze the contribution of each feature towards the prediction, achieving some useful conclusions for the study of variety-seeking intervention mechanism.

References

  1. Wilson T D, Dunn E W. Self-knowledge: Its limits, value, and potential for improvement{J}. Annual review of psychology, 2004, 55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Hoyer w d, ridgway n m. Variety seeking as an explanation for exploratory purchase behavior: a theoretical model{j}. Acr north american advances, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jian j, zhang y, zhang c. Predicting consumer variety-seeking through weather data analytics{j}. Electronic commerce research and applications, 2018, 28: 194--207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Chuang s c, cheng y h, wang s m, et al. The impact of the opinions of others on variety-seeking behavior{j}. Journal of applied social psychology, 2013, 43(5): 917--927.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ariely D, Levav J. Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed{J}. Journal of consumer Research, 2000, 27(3): 279--290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ratner R K, Kahn B E. The impact of private versus public consumption on variety-seeking behavior{J}. Journal of Consumer Research, 2002, 29(2): 246--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Morales A, Kahn B E, McAlister L, et al. Perceptions of assortment variety: The effects of congruency between consumers' internal and retailers' external organization{J}. Journal of Retailing, 2005, 81(2): 159--169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Ha J, Jang S C S. Variety seeking in restaurant choice and its drivers{J}. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2013, 32: 155--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ayhan s, costas p, samet h. Predicting estimated time of arrival for commercial flights{c}//proceedings of the 24th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. Acm, 2018: 33--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Li j, rong y, meng h, et al. Tatc: predicting alzheimer's disease with actigraphy data{c}//proceedings of the 24th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. Acm, 2018: 509--518. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Su y, liu q, liu q, et al. Exercise-enhanced sequential modeling for student performance prediction{c}//thirty-second aaai conference on artificial intelligence. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Yao h, wu f, ke j, et al. Deep multi-view spatial-temporal network for taxi demand prediction{c}//thirty-second aaai conference on artificial intelligence. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ballinger b, hsieh j, singh a, et al. Deepheart: semi-supervised sequence learning for cardiovascular risk prediction{c}//thirty-second aaai conference on artificial intelligence. 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiao b, zhang j, wu c, et al. Deep sequence learning with auxiliary information for traffic prediction{c}//proceedings of the 24th acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. Acm, 2018: 537--546. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Legohérel P, Hsu C H C, Daucé B. Variety-seeking: Using the CHAID segmentation approach in analyzing the international traveler market{J}. Tourism Management, 2015, 46: 359--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kim H S, Drolet A. Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking{J}. Journal of personality and social psychology, 2003, 85(2): 373.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Chawla n v, bowyer k w, hall l o, et al. Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique{j}. Journal of artificial intelligence research, 2002, 16: 321--357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dietterich T G. Ensemble methods in machine learning{C}//International workshop on multiple classifier systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000: 1--15. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Exploring the Prediction of Variety-seeking Behavior

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          DSIT 2019: Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Data Science and Information Technology
          July 2019
          280 pages
          ISBN:9781450371414
          DOI:10.1145/3352411

          Copyright © 2019 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 19 July 2019

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          DSIT 2019 Paper Acceptance Rate43of95submissions,45%Overall Acceptance Rate114of277submissions,41%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader