Mary Jean Harrold
- 1.D. C. Atkinson and W. G. Griswold. The design of whole-program analysis tools. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 16-27, March 1996.]] Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.T. Ball. The concept of dynamic analysis. In Proceedings of the Joint Seventh European Software Engineering Conference (ESEC) and Seventh ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, September 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.T. Ball and S. G. Eick. Software visualization in the large. Computer, 29(4):33-43, April 1996.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.B. Beizer. Software Testing Techniques. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY, 1990.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.A. Bertolino, P. Inverardi, H. Muccini, and A. Rosetti. An approach to integration testing based on architectural descriptions. In Proceedings of the IEEE ICECCS- 97.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.U. Buy, A. Orso, and Pezzi. Issues in testing distributed component-based systems. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Testing Distributed Component-Based Systems, May 1999.]]Google Scholar
- 7.Y. F. Chert, D. S. Rosenblum, and K. P. Vo. TestTube: A system for selective regression testing. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 211-222, May 1994.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.J. J. Chilenski and S. P. Miller. Applicability of modified condition/decision coverage to software testing. Software Engineering Journal, 9(5):191-200.]]Google Scholar
- 9.M. A. Cusamano and R. Selby. How Microsoft builds software. Communications of the ACM, 40(6):53-61, June 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.R. A. DeMillo. Test adequacy and program mutation. In Proceedings of the 11th International on Software Engineering, pages 355-356, may 1989.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.P. Devanbu. GENOA - A customizable, front-end retargetable source code analysis framework. A CM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 9(2):177-212, April 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.P. Devanbu and S. Stubblebine. Software engineering for security: A roadmap. In A. Finkelstein, editor, The Future of Software Engineering. ACM Press, New York, 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.P. Devanbu and S. Stubblebine. Cryptographic verification of test coverage claims. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, in press.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.R.-K. Doong and P. G. Frankl. The ASTOOT approach to testing object-oriented programs. A CM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 3(2):101- 130, April 1994.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.N. S. Eickelmann and D. J. Richardson. What makes one software architecture more testable than another? In Proceedings of the International Software Architecture Symposium, October 1996.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.M. D. Ernst, J. Cockrell, W. Griswold, and D. Notldn. Dynamically discovering likely program invariants to support program evolution. In Proceedings of the 21 st International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 213-224, May 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.N. Fenton and M. Neil. Software metrics: A roadmap. In A. Finkelstein, editor, The Future of Software Engineering. ACM Press, New York, 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.J. B. Goodenough and S. L. Gerhart. Toward a theory of test data selection. IEEE Transactions of Software Engineering, pages 156-173, June 1975.]]Google Scholar
- 19.M. J. Haxrold. Architecture-based regression testing of evolving systems. In International Workshop on the Role of Software Architecture in Testing and Analysis, July 1998.]]Google Scholar
- 20.M. J. Harrold, R. Gupta, and M. L. Sofia. A methodology for controlling the size of a test suite. A CM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2(3):270-285, July 1993.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 21.M. J. Harrold, D. Rosenblum, G. Rothermel, and E. J. Weyuker. Empirical Studies of a Prediction Model for Regression Test Selection. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, in press.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.M. J. Harrold and G. Rothermel. Performing dataflow testing on classes. In Proceedings of the Second A CM SIGSOFT Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 154-163, December 1994.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.M. J. Harrold, G. Rothermel, R. Wu, and L. Yi. An empirical evaluation of program spectra. In Proceedings of ACM Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering, pages 83-90, June 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.J. R. Horgan. Mining system tests to aid software maintenance. The Telcordia Software Visualization and Analysis Research Team, Telcordia Technologies.]]Google Scholar
- 25.D. Jackson and M. Rinard. Reasoning and analysis: A roadmap. In A. Finkelstein, editor, The Future of Software Engineering. ACM Press, New York, 2000.]]Google Scholar
- 26.D. Kung, N. Suchak, J. Gao, P. Hsia, Y. Toyoshima, and C. Chen. On object state testing. In Proceedings of COMPSAC'94, 1994.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- 27.J. W. Laski and B. Korel. A data flow oriented program testing strategy. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 9(3):347-54, May 1983.]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- 28.H. K. N. Leung and L. White. Insights Into Regression Testing. In Proceedings of the Conference on Software Maintenance, pages 60-9, October 1989.]]Google Scholar
- 29.T. Lewis. The next 10, 0002 years, part II. IEEE Computer, pages 78-86, May 1996.]]Google Scholar
- 30.B. Littlewood and L. Strigini. Software reliability and dependability: A roadmap. In A. Finkelstein, editor, The Future of Software Engineering. ACM Press, New York, 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 31.R. Lutz. Software engineering for safety: A roadmap. In A. Finkelstein, editor, The Future of Software Engineering. ACM Press, New York, 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 32.G. McGraw and 3. Viega. Why COTS software increases security risks. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Testing Distribu ted Component- Based Systems, May 1999.]]Google Scholar
- 33.G. Murphy and D. Notldn. Lightweight source model extraction. In Proceedings of the Third A CM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 116-127, October 1995.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 34.G. Murphy, P. Townsend, and P. Wong. Experiences with cluster and class testing. Communications of the ACM, 37(9):39-47, 1994.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 35.K. Onoma, W-T. Tsai, M. Poonawala, and H. Suganuma. Regression testing in an industrial environment. Commummications of the ACM, 41(5):81-86, May 1988.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 36.L. J. Osterweil ET AL. Strategic directions in software quality. ACM Computing Surveys, (4):738-750, December 1996.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 37.T. J. Ostrand and E. J. Weyuker. Using datattow analysis for regression testing. In Sixth Annual Pacific Northwest Software Quality Conference, pages 233-247, September 1988.]]Google Scholar
- 38.H. Pan, R. DeMillo, and E. H. Spafford. Failure and fault analysis for software debugging. In Proceedings of COMPSAC '97, August 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 39.S. L. Pfieeger. Understanding and improving technology transfer in software engineering. Journal of Systems and Software, 47(2-3):111-124, July 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 40.S. Rapps and E. J. Weyuker. Selecting software test data using data flow information. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, SE-11(4):367-375, April 1985.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 41.T. Reps, T. Ball, M. Das, and J. Larus. The use of program profiling for software maintenance with applications to the year 2000 problem, pages 432-439, September 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 42.D. Richardson, J. Stafford, and A. Woff. A formal approach to architecture-based testing. Technical report, University of California, Irvine, 1998.]]Google Scholar
- 43.D. J. Richardson, P. Inverardi, and A. Bertolino, editors. Proceedings of the CNR-NSF International Workshop on the Role of Software Architecture in Testing and Analysis. July 1998.]]Google Scholar
- 44.D. Rosenblum and E. J. Weyuker. Using coverage information to predict the cost-effectiveness of regression testing strategies. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 23(3):146-156, March 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 45.D. S. Rosenblum. Adequate testing of component-based software. Technical Report Technical Report UCI-ICS- 97-34, August 1997.]]Google Scholar
- 46.G. Rothermel and M. J. Harrold. Analyzing regression test selection techniques. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22(8), August 1996.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 47.G. Rothermel, M. J. Harrold, J. Ostrin, and C. Hong. An empirical study of the effects of minimization on the fault-detection capabifities of test suites. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Maintenance, pages 34-43, November 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 48.G. Rothermel and M.J. Harrold. A safe, efficient regression test selection technique. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 6(2):173-210, April 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 49.G. Rothermel, L. Li, C. DuPnis, and M. Burnett. What you see is what you test: A methodology for testing form-based visual programs. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 198-207, April 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 50.M. Shaw and D. Garlan. Software Architecture Perspectives on an Emerging Discipline. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1996.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 51.J. Stafford, D. J. Richardson, and A. L. Wolf. Chaining: A dependence analysis technique for software architecture. Technical Report CU-CS-845-97, University of Colorado, September 1.997.]]Google Scholar
- 52.E. J. Weyuker. Axiomatizing software test data adequacy. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 12(12):1128-1138, December 1986.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 53.W. E. Wong, J. R. Horgan, S. London, and H. Agrawal. A study of effective regression testing in practice. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, pages 230-238, November 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Testing: a roadmap
Recommendations
Asymptotic-Preserving Particle-In-Cell method for the Vlasov-Poisson system near quasineutrality
This paper deals with the numerical resolution of the Vlasov-Poisson system in a nearly quasineutral regime by Particle-In-Cell (PIC) methods. In this regime, Classical PIC methods are subject to stability constraints on the time and space steps related ...
Asymptotic-Preserving Particle-In-Cell methods for the Vlasov-Maxwell system in the quasi-neutral limit
In this article, we design Asymptotic-Preserving Particle-In-Cell methods for the Vlasov-Maxwell system in the quasi-neutral limit, this limit being characterized by a Debye length negligible compared to the space scale of the problem. These methods are ...
A new conservative unsplit method for the solution of the Vlasov equation
We have developed a new conservative method for solving the Vlasov equation without using any splitting technique. Our goal is to maintain the positivity of the distribution function and to avoid un-physical oscillations which might lead to numerical ...
Comments