ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Socially conscious decision-making
Full text PdfPdf (871 KB)
Source International Conference on Autonomous Agents archive
Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Autonomous agents table of contents
Barcelona, Spain
Pages: 217 - 224  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-230-1
Authors
Alyssa Glass  Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, CA
Barbara Grosz  Division of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 15,   Citation Count: 14
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/336595.337385
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bratman, M.E., Israel, D.J., and Pollack, M.E. 1988. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4(4):349-355.
 
2
 
3
Conte, R. and Castelfranchi, C. 1995. Cognitive and Social Action. UCL Press, London, UK.
 
4
Cooper, R., DeJong, D.V., Forsythe, R., Ross, T.W. 1996. Cooperation without reputation: experimental evidence from prisoner's dilemma games. Games and Economic Behavior, 12(1):187-218.
 
5
Gibbons, R. 1992. Game Theory for Applied Economists. Princeton University Press.
 
6
 
7
Grosz, B.J. and Kraus, S. 1999. The evolution of SharedPlans. Rao, A. and Wooldridge, M., editors, Foundations of Rational Agency. Kluwer Academic Press, 227-262.
 
8
Grosz, B.J., Hunsberger, L., and Kraus, S. 1999. Planning and Acting Together. AI Magazine, 20(4):23-34.
 
9
HSllander, H. 1990. A social exchange approach to voluntary cooperation. American Economic Review, 80(5):1157-1167.
 
10
Iannaccone, L.R. 1992. Sacrifice and stigma: reducing free-riding in cults, communes, and other collectives. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2):271-291.
 
11
 
12
Kalenka, S. and Jennings, N.R. 1999. Socially responsible decision making in autonomous agents. Korta, K., et al., editors, Cognition, Agency and Rationality. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 79:135-149.
 
13
Keeney, R. and Ralffa, H. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
 
14
Levesque, H., Cohen, P., and Nunes, J. 1990. On acting together. Proceedings of AAAI-90, 94-99.
 
15
 
16
Sen, S. 1996. Reciprocity: a foundational principle for promoting cooperative behavior among self-interested agents. Proceedings of ICMAS-96, 322-329.
 
17
Shoham, Y. and Tennenholtz, M. 1992. On the synthesis of useful social laws for artificial agent societies. Proceedings of AAAI-92, 276-281.
 
18
 
19
 
20
Sullivan, D.G., Grosz, B.J., and Kraus, S. 2000. Intention reconciliation by collaborative agents. Proceedings of ICMAS-2000 (to appear).
 
21
Tambe, M. 1997. Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 7:83-124.
 
22
Yoon, K.P. and Hwang, C.-L. 1995. Multiple Attribute Decision-Making: An Introduction. Sage University papers, Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Science, vol. 104.

CITED BY  14
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alyssa Glass: colleagues
Barbara Grosz: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: