skip to main content
article
Free Access

A review and applications of information ecologies

Published:01 May 2000Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This review of Information Ecologies notes how well Nardi and O'Day's biological approach fits with articulation theory (in rhetoric), since both encourage spelling out alternatives and consequences so as to avoid oversimplified technology choices. A closer look at the relevance of their case studies to promoting suitable technological improvements in K-12 education, however, finds concerns (about adequate social rewards and sustainability) along with promising parallels.

References

  1. Chartier, Roger. (1992). The order ofbooks. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Davenport, Thomas H. (1997). Information ecology: Mastering the information and knowledge environment. New York: Oxford University Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Davenport, Thomas H. (2000). Mission critical: Realizing the promise of enterprise systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Business Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Gates, Bill, Myhrvold, Nathan, and Rinearson, Peter M. (1996). The road ahead. New York: Penguin. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Grossberg, Lawrence. (1986). On Postmodernism and Articulation with Stuart Hall. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 45-60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Grossberg, Lawerence. (1987). Critical theory and the politics of empirical research. In M. Gurevitch and M. R. Levy (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook, vol. 6 (pp. 86-106). London: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Grossberg, Lawerence. (1992). We gotta get out of thisplace: Popular conservatism andpostmodern culture. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hawisher, Gail E. and Selfe, Cynthia L. (2000). Global literacies and the World-Wide Web. New York: Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Haynes, Cynthia, and Holmevik, Jan Rune (Eds.). (1998). High wired: On the design, use, and theory of education MOOs. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Heckscher, Charles, and Donnellon, Anne (Eds.). (1994). The post-bureaucratic organization: New perspectives on organizational change. Thousand Oaks, NJ: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Holmevik, Jan Rune, and Haynes, Cynthia (Eds.). (2000). MOOuniversity: A student} guide to online learning environments. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, Robert R. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. O'Donnell, James j. (1998). Avatars of the word: From papyrus to cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Selfe, Cynthia. (1999). Technology and literacy in the 2Ist century: The importance ojCpaying attention. Studies in V4riting and Rhetoric series. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Slack, Jennifer. (1984). Communication Technologies and Society. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Slack, Jennifer. (1989). Contextualizing technology. In Brenda Dervin, et al. (Eds.), Rethinking communication (pp. 329-345). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. A review and applications of information ecologies

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader