ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Sampling plausible solutions to multi-body constraint problems
Full text PdfPdf (17.74 MB)
Source International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques archive
Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques table of contents
Pages: 219 - 228  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-208-5
Authors
Stephen Chenney  University of California at Berkeley
D. A. Forsyth  University of California at Berkeley
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 16
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/344779.344882
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Traditional collision intensive multi-body simulations are difficult to control due to extreme sensitivity to initial conditions or model parameters. Furthermore, there may be multiple ways to achieve any one goal, and it may be difficult to codify a user's preferences before they have seen the available solutions. In this paper we extend simulation models to include plausible sources of uncertainty, and then use a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm to sample multiple animations that satisfy constraints. A user can choose the animation they prefer, or applications can take direct advantage of the multiple solutions. Our technique is applicable when a probability can be attached to each animation, with “good” animations having high probability, and for such cases we provide a definition of physical plausibility for animations. We demonstrate our approach with examples of multi-body rigid-body simulations that satisfy constraints of various kinds, for each case presenting animations that are true to a physical model, are significantly different from each other, and yet still satisfy the constraints.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
 
4
5
6
 
7
 
8
Jon Christensen, Joe Marks, and J. Thomas Ngo. Automatic Motion Synthesis for 3D Mass-Spring Models. The Visual Computer, 13(3):20-28, January 1997.
9
 
10
Afonso G. Ferreira and Janez ~;erovnik. Bounding the Probability of Success of Stochastic Methods for Global Optimization. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 25(10):1-8, 1993.
 
11
George S. Fishman. Monte Carlo : concepts, algorithms, and applications. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
 
12
Walter R Gilks, Sylvia Richardson, and David J Spiegelhalter. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall, 1996.
13
14
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
20
 
21
 
22
Brian Mirtich, Yan Zhuang, Ken Goldberg, John Craig, Rob Zanutta, Brian Carlisle, and John Canny. Estimating Pose Statistics for Robotic Part Feeders. In Proceedings 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pages 1140-1146, 1996.
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
Alistair Sinclair, 1999. Personal communication.
28
 
29
Diane Tang, J. Thomas Ngo, and Joe Marks. N-Body Spacetime Constraints. The Journal of Visualization and Computer Animation, 6:143-154, 1995.
 
30
 
31
32

CITED BY  16
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stephen Chenney: colleagues
D. A. Forsyth: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: