ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Energy-efficient randomized routing in radio networks
Full text PdfPdf (855 KB)
Source Workshop on Discrete Algothrithms and Methods for MOBILE Computing and Communications archive
Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Discrete algorithms and methods for mobile computing and communications table of contents
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Pages: 35 - 44  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-301-4
Authors
Koji Nakano  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
Stephan Olariu  Department of Computer Science, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 14,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/345848.345856
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The main contribution of this work is to present an energy-efficient routing protocol for single-channel, single-hop radio networks (RN, for short). Such networks are usually deployed in support of special events including search-and-rescue, disaster relief, law enforcement, and collaborative computing, among many others. An RN is typically populated by hand-held, commodity devices, running on batteries. Since recharging batteries may not be possible while on mission, we are interested in designing protocols that are highly energy-efficient. One of the most effective energy-saving strategies is to mandate individual stations to go to sleep whenever they are not transmitting or recieving messages. Consequently, we are interested in protocols that allow stations to power off their transceiver to the largest extent possible.Suppose that station S(i), (1 ≤ ip), of the RN stores si items. Each item has a unique destination which is the identity of the station to which the item must be routed. The routing problem asks to route all the items to their destinations, while expending as little energy as possible. Since, in the worst case, each item must be transmitted at least once, every routing protocol must take at least n = s1 + s2 ··· sp time slots to terminate. Similarly, each station S(i), (1 ≤ ip), must be awake for at least si + di time slots, where di denotes the number of items destined for S(i). It is well known that a station is expending power while its transceiver is active that is, while transmitting or receiving a packet. It is perhaps surprising at first that a station expends power even if it receives a packet that is not destined for it. Since in single-hop radio networks every station is within transmission range from every other station, the design of energy-efficient protocols is highly nontrivial! An additional complication stems from the inherent asymmetry of the routing problem: no destination knows the identity of the sender, precluding à priori arrangements between senders and receivers.We show that for every ƒ ≥ 1, the task of routing n items can be completed, with probability exceeding 1 - 1/ƒ, in n + O(q + ln ƒ) time slots and that no station S(i), (1 ≤ ip), has to be awake for more than si + di + O(qi + ri log p + log ƒ) time slots, where qi is the number of stations that have items destined for S(i), q = q1 + q2 + ··· + qp, and ri is the number of stations for which S(i) has items. Since qidi, risi, and qn our protocol is close to optimal.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
D. J. Baker, Data{voice communication over a multihop, mobile, high frequency network, Proc. MILCOM'97, Monterey, CA, 1997, 339-343.
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
P. H. Dana, The geographer's craft project, Dept. of Geography, UT Austin, Sept. 1999, http://www.utexas.edu/depts/grg/gcraf/notes/gps/gps.htm:
 
10
W. C. Filer and F. J. Bruno, Low cost packet radio, Proceedings of the IEEE, 75, (1987), 33-42.
 
11
M. Fine and F. A Tobagi, Demand assignment multiple access schemes in broadcast bus local area networks, IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-33, (1984), 1130-1159.
 
12
W. R. Franta and M. B. Bilodeau, Analysis of prioritized CSMA protocol based on staggered delays, Acta Informatica, 13, (1980), 299-324.
 
13
W. R. Franta and J. R. Heath, Measurement and analysis of HYPERchannel networks, IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-33, (1984), 1124-1130.
 
14
 
15
J. C. Haartsen, The Bluetooth radio system, IEEE Personal Communications, 7, (2000), 28-36.
 
16
E. P. Harris and K. W. Warren, Low power technologies: a system perspective, Proc. Third International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications, Princeton, N J, September 1996.
 
17
A. Iwata, C.-C. Chiang, G. Pei, M. Gerla, and T.-W. Chen, Scalable routing strategies for ad-hoc networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17, (1999), ~369-1379.
 
18
E. D. Kaplan, Understanding GPS: principles and applications, Artech House, Boston, 1996.
 
19
C. R. Lin and M. Gerla, Adaptive clustering for mobile wireless networks, IEEE Transaction on Special Areas of Communications, (1999), 1265-1275.
 
20
W. Mangione-Smith and P. S. Ghang, A low power medium access control protocol for portable multimedia devices, Proc. Third International Workshop on Mobile Multimedia Communications, Princeton, NJ, September 1996.
 
21
 
22
K. Nakano, Optimal sorting algorithms on bus-connected processor arrays, IEICE Transactions Fundamentals, E-76A, 11, (1994), 2008-2015.
 
23
 
24
K. Nakano and S. Olariu, Randomized log log n-round leader election protocols in radio networks, Proc. SIROCCO'2000, June 2000, to appear.
 
25
 
26
M. Joa-Ng and I.-T. Lu, A peer-to-peer zone-based two-level link state routing for mobil e ad-hoc networks, IEEE Journal of Selected Areas in Communications, 17, (1999), 1415-1425.
 
27
B. Parkinson and S. Gilbert, NAVSTAR: global positioning system- ten years later, Proceedings of the IEEE, 1983, 1177-1186.
 
28
R. A. Powers, Batteries for low-power electronics, Proceedings of the IEEE, 83, (1995), 687-693.
 
29
A. K. Salkintzis and C. Chamzas, An in-band power-saving protocol for mobile data networks, IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-46, (1998), 1194-1205.
 
30
R. Sanchez, J. Evans, and G. Minden, Networking on the battlefield: challenges in highly dynamic multihop wireless networks, Proc. of IEEE MILCOM'99, Atlantic City, NJ, October 1999.
31
 
32
K. Sivalingam, M. B. Srivastava, and P. Agrawal, Low power link and access protocols for wireless multimedia networks, Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference VTC'97, Phoenix, AZ, May, 1997.
 
33
M. Stemm, P. Gauthier, and D. Harada, Reducing power consumption on network interfaces in hand-held devices, Proc. 3-rd International Workshop on Multimedia Communications, Princeton, 1996.
 
34
F. Tobagi and V. B. Hunt, Performance evaluation of carrier sense multiple access with collision detection, Computer Networks, 4, (1980), 435-467.
 
35
J. E. Wieselthier, G. D. Nguyen, and A. Ephemerides, Multicasting in energy-limited ad-hoc wireless networks, Proc. MILCOM'98, 1998.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Koji Nakano: colleagues
Stephan Olariu: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: