ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Continuations for parallel logic programming
Full text PdfPdf (238 KB)
Source International Conference on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGPLAN international conference on Principles and practice of declarative programming table of contents
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Pages: 257 - 267  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISBN:1-58113-265-4
Authors
Eneia Todoran  Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, Dept. of Computer Science, Parallel and Distributed Systems Laboratory, Baritiu Str. 28, 3400, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Nikolaos S. Papaspyrou  National Technical University of Athens, Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Software Engineering Laboratory, Polytechnioupoli, 15780 Zografou, Greece
Sponsor
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 10,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/351268.351297
What is a DOI?

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
R. Bahgat. PANDORA: nondeterministic parallel logic programming. World Scienti~c, 1993.
 
3
Y. Bekkers and P. Tarau. Monadic constructs for logic programming. In J. Lloyd, editor, Proceedings of ILSP'95, pages 51{65, Portland, OR, Dec. 1995. MIT Press.
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
A. de Bruin. Experiments with continuation semantics: jumps, backtracking, dynamic networks. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1986.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
 
18
A. Mazurkiewicz. Proving algorithms by tail functions. Information and Control, 18:220{226, 1971.
 
19
C. Mierkovsky, S. Taylor, E. Shapiro, J. Levy, and M. Safra. The design and implementation of at concurrent Prolog. Technical Report CS85-09, Weizmain Institute, Department of Applied Mathematics, Israel, 1985.
 
20
E. Moggi. An abstract view of programming languages. Technical Report ECS-LFCS-90-113, University of Edinburgh, Laboratory for Foundations of Computer Science, 1990.
 
21
 
22
S. Peyton Jones and J. H. (editors). Report on the programming language Haskell 98: a non-strict purely functional language, 1999. Available from http://haskell.org/.
23
 
24
 
25
E. Y. Shapiro. A subset of concurrent Prolog and its interpreter. Technical Report TR-003, ICOT, Tokyo, 1983.
26
 
27
G. Smolka. A calculus for higher-order concurrent constraint programming with deep guards. Research Report RR-94-03, Deutsches Forschungszentrum f? ur Kunstliche Intelligenz (DFKI), Saarbrucken, Germany, 1994.
 
28
G. Smolka. The Oz programming model. In Computer Science Today, volume 1000 of LNCS, pages 324{343. Springer Verlag, 1995.
 
29
C. Strachey and C. P. Wadsworth. Continuations: a mathematical semantics for handling full jumps. Technical Monograph PRG-11, Oxford University, Programming Research Group, 1974.
 
30
E. Todoran. Metric semantics for synchronous and assynchronous communication: a continuations based approach. Electronic Notes on Theoretical Computer Science, 28:119{146, 2000.
 
31
 
32
33
 
34
D. H. D. Warren. The Andorra principle. Talk given at the Gigalips Workshop, Swedish Institute of Computer Science (SICS), Stockholm, Sweden, 1988.
 
35
D. H. D. Warren. Extended Andorra model with implicit control. Talk given at a Parallel Logic Programming Workshop, Eilat, Israel, 1990.
 
36


Collaborative Colleagues:
Eneia Todoran: colleagues
Nikolaos S. Papaspyrou: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: