Anton Leuski
- 1.I. J. Aalbersberg. Incremental relevance feedback. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 11-22, 1992. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.J. Allan. Incremental relevance feedback for information filtering. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 270-278, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 3.J. Allan, J. Callan, B. Croft, L. Ballesteros, J. Broglio, J. Xu, and H. Shu. Inquery at TREC-5. In Fifth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-5), pages 119-132, 1997.Google Scholar
- 4.J. Allan, J. Callan, W. B. Croft, L. Ballesteros, D. Byrd, R. Swan, and J. Xu. Inquery does battle with TREC-6. In Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6), pages 169-206, 1998.Google Scholar
- 5.M. Balabanovic. An adaptive web page recommendation service. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pages 378-385, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 6.R. K. Belew. Adaptive information retrieval: using a connectionist representation to retrieve and learn about documents. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 11-20, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.H. Berliner. On the construction of evaluation functions for large domains. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1979.Google Scholar
- 8.P. V. BironandD. H. Kraft. Newmethods for relevance feedback: improving information retrieval performance. In ACM symposium on Applied computing, pages 482-487, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 9.C. Buckley and G. Salton. Optimization of relevance feedback weights. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 351-357, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.J. P. Callan. Learning while filtering documents. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 224-231, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Y. S. Choi and S. I. Yoo. Multi-agent learning approach to www information retrieval using neural network. In Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 23-30, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.CMAC. http://www.ece.unh.edu/robots/cmac.htm.Google Scholar
- 13.D. Harman and E. Voorhees, editors. The Fifth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-5). NIST, 1997.Google Scholar
- 14.D. Harman and E. Voorhees, editors. The Sixth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-6). NIST, 1998.Google Scholar
- 15.M. A. Hearst and J. O. Pedersen. Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: Scatter/gather on retrieval results. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 76-84, Aug. 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.M. Hemmje, C. Kunkel, and A. Willet. LyberWorld - a visualization user interface supporting fulltext retrieval. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 254-259, July 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.D. A. Hull, J. O. Pedersen, and H. Schutze. Method combination for document filtering. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 279-287, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.T. Joachims, D. Freitag, and T. Mitchell. Webwatcher: A tour guide for the world wide web. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pages 770-778, 1997.Google Scholar
- 19.K. L. Kwok. A network approach to probabilistic information retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 13(3):324-353, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.A. Leuski and J. Allan. Evaluating a visual navigation system for a digital library. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 2000. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- 21.A. Leuski and J. Allan. Improving interactive retrieval by combining ranked lists and clustering. In Proceedings of RIAO'2000, pages 665-681, April 2000.Google Scholar
- 22.A. Leuski and J. Allan. Lighthoise: showing the way to relevant information. In Proceedings of InfoVis'2000, October 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.D. D. Lewis, R. E. Schapire, J. P. Callan, and R. Papka. Training algorithms for linear text classifiers. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 298-306, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 24.F. Menczer and R. K. Belew. Adaptive information agents in distributed textual environments. In Proceedings of the second international conference on Autonomous agents, pages 157-164, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25.H. T. Ng, W. B. Goh, and K. L. Low. Feature selection, perception learning, and a usability case study for text categorization. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 67 - 73, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.S. E. Robertson, S. Walker, S. Jones, M. M. Hancock-Beaulieu, and M. Gatford. Okapi at TREC-3. In D. Harman and E. Voorhees, editors, Third Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3). NIST, 1995.Google Scholar
- 27.J. J. Rocchio, Jr. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In G. Salton, editor, The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 313-323. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1971.Google Scholar
- 28.G. Salton. Automatic Text Processing. Addison-Wesley, 1989. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 29.G. Salton and C. Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41:288-297, 1990.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 30.R. E. Schapire, Y. Singer, and A. Singhal. Boosting and rocchio applied to text filtering. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 215-223, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 31.H. Schutze, D. A. Hull, and J. O. Pedersen. A comparison of classifiers and document representations for the routing problem. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 229-237, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 32.J. Shavlik, S. Calcari, T. Eliassi-Rad, and J. Solock. An instructable, adaptive interface for discovering and monitoring information on the world-wide web. In Proceedings of the 1999 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, pages 157-160, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 33.R. S. Sutton and A. G. Barto. Reinforcement learning: an introduction. The MIT Press, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 34.R. Wilkinson and P. Hingston. Using the cosine measure in a neural network for document retrieval. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 202-210, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 35.J. Xu and W. B. Croft. Querying expansion using local and global document analysis. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR, pages 4-11, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Relevance and reinforcement in interactive browsing
Recommendations
Relevance for browsing, relevance for searching
The concept of relevance has received a great deal of theoretical attention. Separately, the relationship between focused search and browsing has also received extensive theoretical attention. This article aims to integrate these two literatures with a ...
Interactive content-based image retrieval using relevance feedback
Database search engines are generally used in a one-shot fashion in which a user provides query information to the system and, in return, the system provides a number of database instances to the user. A relevance feedback system allows the user to ...
The influence of relevance levels on the effectiveness of interactive information retrieval
In this paper, we focus on the effect of graded relevance on the results of interactive information retrieval (IR) experiments based on assigned search tasks in a test collection. A group of 26 subjects searched for four Text REtrieval Conference (TREC) ...
Comments