Keith S. Karn
ABSTRACT
Users of most video-based eye trackers apply proximity algorithms to identify fixations and assume that saccades are what happen in between. Most video-based eye trackers sample at 60 Hz., a rate which is too low to reliably find small saccades in an eye position record. We propose to call these slower eye trackers and their typical proximity analysis routines “fixation pickers.”
Systems such as dual-Purkinje-image (DPI) trackers, coil systems, and electro-oculography permit higher sampling rates, typically providing the 250 Hz or greater sampling frequency necessary to detect most saccades. Researchers using these types of eye trackers typically focus on identifying saccades using velocity based algorithms and assume that fixations are what happen in between these movements. We propose to call these faster eye trackers and their velocity-based analysis routines “saccade pickers.”
Given that fixation pickers and saccade pickers extract different things from an eye position record, it is no wonder that the two systems yield different results. This discrepancy has become a problem in eye movement research. A study of cognitive processing conducted with one eye tracking system is likely to give results which cannot be easily compared to a study conducted with another eye tracker. Imagine that two investigators are both interested in studying visual search. Both choose the number of saccades as one of their dependent variables to measure search performance. One investigator chooses a video-based fixation picker. The other investigator chooses a DPI-based saccade picker. Because the saccade picker is tuned to identify smaller saccades, the investigator with the DPI tracker reports more saccades and fixations during an equivalent visual search task compared to the investigator with the video-based tracker. Both investigations are likely to produce valid results, but results which are not comparable to the other investigator's.
Index Terms
- “Saccade pickers” vs. “fixation pickers”: the effect of eye tracking instrumentation on research
Recommendations
An Investigation of Automatic Saccade and Fixation Detection from Wearable Infrared Cameras
2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC)Eye movement plays an important role in cognition and perception, and the detection of saccade and fixation has been studied for human-computer applications, however often under conditions where head movement is constrained, and often using calibration-...
Stochastic bottom-up fixation prediction and saccade generation
In this article, a novel technique for fixation prediction and saccade generation will be introduced. The proposed model simulates saccadic eye movement to incorporate the underlying eye movement mechanism into saliency estimation. To this end, a simple ...
Effects of state of eye movements before saccade on efficiency of response to stimulus – comparison of search efficiency between fixation and smooth pursuit states
It was explored how the state of eye movement before saccade affected the response to a stimulus. The state of eye movement before saccade was either smooth pursuit or fixation. The smooth pursuit was carried out both clockwise and counter-clockwise. ...
Comments