Abstract
In this article the author urges a prudent and decentralized approach to the question of the design and desirability of computerized community information utilities. Before accepting the inevitability and desirability of this or any technology, we should: (1) be sure of the feasibility (internally and externally) of what is proposed; (2) project and perhaps wait for changes in complementary techniques; (3) evaluate current and projected supplementary techniques; (4) establish the existence of demand for what is proposed; (5) take steps to involve a representative group of ultimate users in systems design, and (6) carefully think through possible side effects on man and his world view.
Current proposals for community information utilities are examined in this framework, and the conclusion is drawn that society is not yet in a position to justify either the construction of an information utility in a prototype community or the acceptance of a policy in favor of its widespread implementation.
- 1 Sackman, H. and Boehm, B.W. (Eds). Planning Community Information Utilities. AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., 1972.Google Scholar
- 2 Parker E.B. and Dunn, D.A. "Information Technology: Its Social Potential,' Science, vol. 176, pp. 1392-9.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3 Japan Computer Usage Development Institute, The Plan for Information Society--a National Goal Toward Year 2000 {sic}, 1972.Google Scholar
- 4 McDermott, J. Technology: The opiate of the intellectuals. New York Review of Books, July 31, 1969.Google Scholar
- 5 Taube, M. Computers and Common Sense, Ch. 1, 2, 3. Columbia U. Press, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
- 6 Nielsen, N.R. Economic Design. In {1}.Google Scholar
- 7 Day, L. The future of computer and communications services. Proc. AFIPS 1973 NCC, AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J.Google Scholar
- 8 Bedford, M. The Future of Communications Services in the Home, Business Planning, Bell Canada, Montreal, Nov. 1972 (proprietary).Google Scholar
- 9 Kling, R. Towards a person-centered computer technology. Proc. ACM 1972 Nat. Conf.Google Scholar
- 10 Goodman, P. Can technology be humane? New York Review of Books, Nov 20, 1969.Google Scholar
- 11 A national survey of the publics attitudes toward computers. Time Magazine and}AFIPS Press, Montvale, N.J., Nov. 1971.Google Scholar
- 12 The People's Computer Company, Box 310, Menlo Park, CA 94025. Also by the same publisher, a quarterly which carries news of other such centers.Google Scholar
- 13 Gilchrlst, B. Public involvement and acceptance.Google Scholar
- 14 Press, L. Toward information processing literacy. Honeywell Computer J. 7, 7 (1973).Google Scholar
- 15 Mumford, L. Technics and Civilization. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York, 1934.Google Scholar
- 16 Watson, T.J. Jr. Technological change. In Goals for Americans, The Report of the President's Committee on National Goals. Prentice-Hall, Engiewood Cliffs, N.J., 1960.Google Scholar
- 17 Simon, H.A. A computer for everyman. American Scholar (1966), 258-264.Google Scholar
- 18 Forster, E.M. The Eternal Moment and Other Stories. Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York, 1928.Google Scholar
- 19 Thoreau, H.D. Walden. The New American Library, New York, 1960.Google Scholar
- 20 Wiener, N. The Human Use of Human Beings, Cybernetics and Society, Doubleday, New York, 1954.Google Scholar
- 21 Nilles, J., Carlson, F., Hanneman, G. and Gray, P. Development of policy on the transportation/ telecommunications trade-off, final report. NSF Grant GI-39019, June 1974.Google Scholar
- 22 Press, L.I. Toward information processing Iiteracy--,experience teaching programming. Pruc. Fifth Conf. on Computers in the Undergraduate Curricula. Pullman, Washington, June 1974.Google Scholar
- 23 Cable Television Information Center. Status Report on Two- Way Testbeds. Washington, D.C., May 1973.Google Scholar
- 24 Callais, R.T. Subscriber Response system Progress Report. Theta-Com, 2216 W. Peoria Ave., Phoenix, AZ 18068, June 1973.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Arguments for a moratorium on the construction of a community information utility
Recommendations
Real arguments are approximate arguments
AAAI'07: Proceedings of the 22nd national conference on Artificial intelligence - Volume 1There are a number of frameworks for modelling argumentation in logic. They incorporate a formal representation of individual arguments and techniques for comparing conflicting arguments. A common assumption for logic-based argumentation is that an ...
Multiattribute Utility Theory Without Expected Utility Foundations
Methods for determining the form of utilities are needed for the implementation of utility theory in specific decisions. An important step forward was achieved when utility theorists characterized useful parametric families of utilities and simplifying ...
Public Policies on eParticipation in Austria
ePart '09: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Electronic ParticipationThis paper assesses the status of eParticipation within the political system in Austria. It takes a top-down perspective focusing on the role of public participation and public policies on eParticipation. The status of eParticipation in Austria as well ...
Comments