ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
“According to Abramowitz and Stegun” or arccoth needn't be uncouth
Full text PdfPdf (687 KB)
Source ACM SIGSAM Bulletin archive
Volume 34 ,  Issue 2  (June 2000) table of contents
Special issue of OpenMath
Pages: 58 - 65  
Year of Publication: 2000
ISSN:0163-5824
Authors
Robert M. Corless  Ontario Research Centre for Computer Algebra
David J. Jeffrey  Ontario Research Centre for Computer Algebra
Stephen M. Watt  Ontario Research Centre for Computer Algebra
James H. Davenport  Dept. Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, England
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/362001.362023
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper addresses the definitions in OpenMath of the elementary functions. The original OpenMath definitions, like most other sources, simply cite [2] as the definition. We show that this is not adequate, and propose precise definitions, and explore the relationships between these definitions.In particular, we introduce the concept of a couth pair of definitions, e.g. of arcsin and arcsinh, and show that the pair arccot and arccoth can be couth.


CITED BY  7
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Robert M. Corless: colleagues
David J. Jeffrey: colleagues
Stephen M. Watt: colleagues
James H. Davenport: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: