skip to main content
10.1145/365024.365090acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Shall we mix synthetic speech and human speech?: impact on users' performance, perception, and attitude

Published:01 March 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

Because it is impractical to record human voice for ever-changing dynamic content such as email messages and news, many commercial speech applications use human speech for fixed prompts and synthetic speech (TTS) for the dynamic content. However, this mixing approach may not be optimal from a consistency perspective. A 2-condition between-group experiment (N = 24) was conducted to compare two versions of a virtual-assistant interface (mixing human voice and TTS vs. TTS-only). Users interacted with the virtual assistant to manage some email and calendar tasks. Their task performance, self-perception of task performance, and attitudinal responses were measured. Users interacting with the TTS-only interface performed the task significantly better, while users interacting with the mixed-voices interface thought they did better and had more positive attitudinal responses. Explanations and design implications are suggested.

References

  1. 1.Domangue, B.B. Decoding effects of cognitive complexity, tolerance of ambiguity, and verbalnonverbal inconsistency. Journal of Personality, 46, 519-535, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. 2.Fiske, S.T. and Taylor, S.E. Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Graves, J.R. and Robinson, J.D. Proxemic behavior as a function of inconsistent verbal and nonverbal messages. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 333-338, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4.Hendrick, C. Effects of salience of stimulus inconsistency on impression formation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 22, 219-222, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Isbister, K. and Nass, C. Consistency of personality in interactive characters: Verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics. International Journal of Human- Computer Studies, 53, 251-267, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6.Kelley, H. H. Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Lai, J., Wood, D., and Considine, M. The effect of task conditions on the comprehensibility of synthetic speech. The Proceedings of CHI '00 (The Hague, The Netherlands, March 2000), ACM Press, 321-328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Nass, C. and Gong, L. Maximized modality or constrained consistency? The Proceedings of AVSP'99 (Santa Cruz CA, August 1999), 1-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Olive, J.P. "The talking computer": Text-to-speech synthesis. In Stork D.G. (Ed.), HAL's Legacy: 2001's Computer as Dream and Reality (pp. 101-131). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Ralston, J.V., Pisoni, D.B., and Mullennix, J.W. Perception and comprehension of speech. In Syrdal, A.K., Bennett, R.W., Greenspan, S.L. (Eds.), Applied Speech Technology (pp. 233-288). Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Reeves, B. and Nass, C. The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television, and New Media like Real People and Places. New York: Cambridge University Press/CSLI, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.www.conita.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.www.genmagic.com/portico/portico_home.shtmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.www.lhsl.com/realspeak/demo.cfmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.www.research.att.com/projects/ttsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Shall we mix synthetic speech and human speech?: impact on users' performance, perception, and attitude

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '01: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              March 2001
              559 pages
              ISBN:1581133278
              DOI:10.1145/365024

              Copyright © 2001 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 March 2001

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • Article

              Acceptance Rates

              CHI '01 Paper Acceptance Rate69of352submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

              Upcoming Conference

              CHI '24
              CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              May 11 - 16, 2024
              Honolulu , HI , USA

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader