- 1.Apache server project. http://www.apache.org.]]Google Scholar
- 2.Differentiated services (diffserv). http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/diffservcharter.html.]]Google Scholar
- 3.Integrated Services (intserv). http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/intservcharter.html.]]Google Scholar
- 4.Usability Engineering. Academic Press, 1993.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 5.T. F. Abdelzaher and N. Bhatti. Web server qos management by adaptive content delivery. InIEEE Infocom, 2000. http://www.ieee-infocom.org/2000/papers.]]Google Scholar
- 6.J. Almeida, M. Dabu, A. Manikutty, and P. Cao. Providing differentiated quality-of-service in web hosting services. In 1998 Workshop on Internet Server Performance, June 1998. http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~cao/publications.html.]]Google Scholar
- 7.V. Almeida, A. Bestavros, M. Crovella, and A. de Oliveira. Characterizing reference locality inthe www. In In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference onParallel and Distributed Information Systems, December 1996. IEEE.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.G. Alwang. Web servers benchmark tests. PC Magazine, May 1998.]]Google Scholar
- 9.N. Bhatti and R. Friedrich. Web server support for tiered services. IEEE Network, pages 64{71, September/October 1999.]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.E. Borowsky, R. Golding, P. Jacobson, A. Merchant, L. Schreier, M. Spasojevic, and J. Wilkes. Capacity planning with phased workloads. In Proc. WOSP'98, Santa Fe, NM, October 1998. ACM. www.hpl.hp.com/research/itc/csl/ssp/papers/index.html.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.X. Chen and P. Mohapatra. Lifetime behavior and its impact on web caching. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Internet Applications (WIAPP'99), San Jose, CA, July 1999. dlib.computer.org/conferen/wiapp/0197/pdf/01970054.pdf.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.X. Chen and P. Mohapatra. Providing differentiated service from an internet server. In Proceedings of IEEE Internet Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN'99), Boston, MA, October 1999.]]Google Scholar
- 13.X. Chen and P. Mohapatra. Service differentiating internet servers. submitted to IEEE Transaction on Computers, 2000.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.M. E. Crovella and A. Bestavros. Self-similarity in world wide web traffic: Evidence and possible causes. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 5(6):835-846, December 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.L. Eggert and J. Heidemann. Application-level differentiated services for web servers. In World Wide Web Journal, 3(2):133-142, 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 16.V. S. Frost and B. Melamed. Traffic modeling for telecommunications networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 32(3):70-81, March 1994.]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- 17.M. Harchol-Balter, M. E. Crovella, and C. D. Murta. On choosing a task assignment policy for a distributed server system. In Proceedings of Performance Tools '98, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 1469, pages 231-242, 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 18.A. K. Iyengar, E. MacNair, and T. Nguyen. An analysis web server performance. In Proceedings of the IEEE 1997 Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM '97), Phoeniz, AZ, November 1997.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- 19.A. K. Iyengar, M. S. Squillante, and L. Zhang. Analysis and characterization of large-scale web server access patterns and performance. World Wide Web, pages 85-100, 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 20.L. Kleinrock. Queueing Systems. John Wiley & Sons, 1976.]]Google Scholar
- 21.T. T. Kwan, R. E. McGrath, and D. A. Reed. User access patterns to ncsa's world wide web server. CS Tech Report UIUCDCS-R-95-1934, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, February 1995. ftp://ftp.cs.uiuc.edu/pub/dept/tech reports/1995/.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.K. Li and S. Jamin. A measurement-based admission-controlled web server. In Proceedings of the IEEE Infocom 2000 Conference, Tel-Aviv, Israel, March 2000.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- 23.J. C. Mogul. Network behavior of a busy web server and its clients. Technical Report Technical Report WRL 95/5, DEC Western Research Laboratory, Palo Alto, CA, October 1995.]]Google Scholar
- 24.R. Morris and D. Lin. Variance of aggregated web traffic. In IEEE Infocom, 2000. http://www.ieee-infocom.org/2000/papers.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- 25.R. Pandey, J. F. Barnes, and R. Olsson. Supporting Quality Of Service in HTTP Servers. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual SIGACT-SIGOPS Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 247-256, Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, June 1998. ACM.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- 26.K. Sohraby and M. Sidi. On the performance of bursty and correlated sources subject to leaky bucket rate-based access control schemes. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Communications (IEEE Infocom), pages 426{434, Bal Harbour, Florida, April 1991.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- 27.T. Wilson. E-biz bucks lost under ssl strain. Internet Week Online, May 20 1999. http://www.internetwk.com/lead/lead052099.htm.]]Google Scholar
Index Terms
- An admission control scheme for predictable server response time for web accesses
Recommendations
ACES: An efficient admission control scheme for QoS-aware web servers
The unpredictability of server response performance hinders the advance of new application on the Internet. In this paper, we present an efficient admission control algorithm, ACES, based on the server workload characteristics. The admission control ...
Fair intelligent admission control over resource-feedback DiffServ network
The basic DiffServ model lacks mechanisms to prevent itself from being overloaded and to inform its internal capability to the external world. This paper addresses the problem by presenting a Fair Intelligent Admission Control (FIAC) over an enhanced-...
Resilient network admission control
Network admission control (NAC) limits the traffic in a network to avoid overload and to assure thereby the quality of service (QoS) for admitted flows. Overload may occur due to exceptional traffic demand, but it is mostly caused by redirected traffic ...
Comments