skip to main content
10.5555/375213.375232acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Six degree-of-freedom haptic display of polygonal models

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 October 2000Publication History
First page image

References

  1. {AS96} R. S. Avila and L. M. Sobierajski. A haptic interaction method for volume visualization. Proceedings of Visualization'96, pages 197-204, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. {Bar90} D. Baraff. Curved surfaces and coherence for non-penetrating rigid body simulation. ACM Computer Graphics, 24(4):19-28, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. {Bar94} David Baraff. Fast contact force computation for nonpenetrating rigid bodies. In Andrew Glassner, editor, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH '94, pages 23-34. ACM SIGGRAPH, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. {BD92} C. Bajaj and T. Dey. Convex decomposition of polyhedra and robustness. SIAM J. of Comput., (No. 2):339-364, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. {BOYBK90} Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., Ming Ouh-Young, James J. Batter, and P. Jerome Kilpatrick. Project GROPE -- Haptic displays for scientific visualization. In Forest Baskett, editor, Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH '90 Proceedings), volume 24, pages 177-185, August 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. {BV93} W. Bouma and G. Vanecek. Modeling contacts in a physically based simulation. Second Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, pages 409-419, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. {Bur96} G. Burdea. Force and Touch Feedback for Virtual Reality. John Wiley and Sons, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. {Che99} E. Chen. Six degree-of-freedomhaptic system for desktopvirtual prototyping applications. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Virtual Reality and Prototyping, pages 97-106, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. {CLMP95} J. Cohen, M. Lin, D. Manocha, and M. Ponamgi. I-collide: An interactive and exact collision detection system for large-scale environments. In Proc. of ACM Interactive 3D Graphics Conference, pages 189-196, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. {CB94} J. E. Colgate and J. M. Brown. Factors affecting the z-width of a haptic display. IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3205- 3210, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. {Cea94} J. E. Colgate, et al. Issues in the haptic display of tool use. Proceedings of the ASME Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, pages 140-144, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. {DHKS93} D. Dobkin, J. Hershberger, D. Kirkpatrick, and S. Suri. Computing the intersection-depth of polyhedra. Algorithmica, 9:518-533, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. {EL00} S. A. Ehmann and M. C. Lin. Accelerated proximity queries between convex polyhedra by multi-level Voronoi marching. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. {Gib95} S. Gibson. Beyondvolumerendering: Visualization, haptic exploration, and physical modelingof element-based objects. In Proc. Eurographics workshop on Visualization in Scientific Computing, pages 10-24, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. {GJK88} E. G. Gilbert, D. W. Johnson, and S. S. Keerthi. A fast procedure for computing the distance between objects in three-dimensional space. IEEE J. Robotics and Automation, vol RA-4:193-203, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. {GLM96} S. Gottschalk, M. Lin, and D. Manocha. Obb-tree: A hierarchical structure for rapid interference detection. In Proc. of ACM Siggraph'96, pages 171-180, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. {GLGT99} A. Gregory, M. Lin, S. Gottschalk, and R. Taylor. H-collide: A framework for fast and accurate collision detection for haptic interaction. In Proceedings of Virtual Reality Conference 1999, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. {GHZ99} L. Guibas, D. Hsu, and L. Zhang. H-Walk: Hierarchical distance computation for moving convex bodies. Proc. of ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. {Hub95} P. M. Hubbard. Collision detection for interactive graphics applications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1(3):218- 230, September 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. {Iwa90} Hiroo Iwata. Artificial reality with force-feedback: development of desktop virtual space with compact master manipulator. In Proc. of SIGRAPH , pages 165-170, August 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. {JC98} D. Johnson and E. Cohen. A frameworkfor efficient minimum distance computation. IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3678-3683, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. {KHM+98} J. Klosowski, M. Held, J.S.B. Mitchell, H. Sowizral, and K. Zikan. Efficient collision detection using bounding volume hierarchies of k-dops. IEEE Trans. on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 4(1):21- 37, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. {LC91} Ming C. Lin and John F. Canny. Efficient algorithms for incremental distance computation. In IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation , pages 1008-1014, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. {Lin93} Ming C. Lin. Efficient Collision Detection for Animation and Robotics. PhD thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley, December 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. {LGLM99} E. Larsen, S. Gottschalk, M. Lin and D. Manocha. Fast Proximity Queries with Swept Sphere Volumes. Technical Report TR99-018, Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. {MC95} B. Mirtich and J. Canny. Impulse-based simulation of rigid bodies. In Proc. of ACM Interactive 3D Graphics, Monterey, CA, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. {MLM00} A. Mascarenhas, M. C. Lin and D. Manocha. Six Degree-of-Freedom Haptic Visualization of Force Fields Technical Report, Computer Science Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. {MPT99} W. McNeely, K. Puterbaugh, and J. Troy. Six degree-of-freedom haptic renderingusing voxel sampling. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 401- 408, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. {MS94} T. M. Massie and J. K. Salisbury. The phantom haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects. Proc. of ASME Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 1:295-301, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. {NNHJ98} A. Nahvi, D. Nelson, J. Hollerbach, and D. Johnson. Haptic manipulation of virtual mechanisms from mechanical cad designs. In Proc. of IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 375-380, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. {PML97} M. Ponamgi, D. Manocha, and M. Lin. Incremental algorithms for collision detection between polygonal models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 3(1):51-67, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. {Qui94} S. Quinlan. Efficient distance computation between non-convex objects. In Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation , pages 3324-3329, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. {RKK97} D.C. Ruspini, K. Kolarov, and O. Khatib. The haptic display of complex graphical environments. Proc. of ACM SIGGRAPH, pages 345-352, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. {SBM+95} K. Salisbury, D. Brock, T. Massie, N. Swarup, and C. Zilles. Haptic rendering: Programming touch interaction with virtual objects. Proc. of 1995 ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pages 123-130, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. {Sny95} J. Snyder. An interactive tool for placing curved surfaces without interpenetration. In Proceedings of ACM Siggraph, pages 209-218, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. {ST97} SensAble Technologies Inc. GHOSTTM : Sofware developer's toolkit. Programmer's Guide, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. {TJC97} T.V. Thompson, D. Johnson, and E. Cohen. Direct haptic rendering of sculptured models. Proc. of ACM Interactive 3D Graphics, pages 167- 176, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. {ZS95} C. Zilles and K. Salisbury. A constraint-based god object method for haptics display. In Proc. of IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. on Intelligent Robotics and Systems, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Six degree-of-freedom haptic display of polygonal models

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader