ABSTRACT
Through {\em adjustable autonomy} (AA), an agent can dynamically vary the degree to which it acts autonomously, allowing it to exploit human abilities to improve its performance, but without becoming overly dependent and intrusive in its human interaction. AA research is critical for successful deployment of multi-agent systems in support of important human activities. While most previous AA work has focused on individual agent-human interactions, this paper focuses on {\em teams} of agents operating in real-world human organizations. The need for agent teamwork and coordination in such environments introduces novel AA challenges. First, agents must be more judicious in asking for human intervention, because, although human input can prevent erroneous actions that have high team costs, one agent's inaction while waiting for a human response can lead to potential miscoordination with the other agents in the team. Second, despite appropriate local decisions by individual agents, the overall team of agents can potentially make global decisions that are unacceptable to the human team. Third, the diversity in real-world human organizations requires that agents gradually learn individualized models of the human members, while still making reasonable decisions even before sufficient data are available. We address these challenges using a multi-agent AA framework based on an adaptive model of users (and teams) that reasons about the uncertainty, costs, and constraints of decisions at {\em all} levels of the team hierarchy, from the individual users to the overall human organization. We have implemented this framework through Markov decision processes, which are well suited to reason about the costs and uncertainty of individual and team actions. Our approach to AA has proven essential to the success of our deployed multi-agent Electric Elves system that assists our research group in rescheduling meetings, choosing presenters, tracking people's locations, and ordering meals.
- 1.J. Collins, C. Bilot, M. Gini, and B. Mobasher. Mixed-initiative decision-support in agent-based automated contracting. In Proc. of Agents'2000, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2.G. A. Dorais, R. P. Bonasso, D. Kortenkamp, B. Pell, and D. Schreckenghost. Adjustable autonomy for human-centered autonomous systems on mars. In Proc. of the First Int. Conf. of the Mars Society, 1998.Google Scholar
- 3.G. Ferguson, J. Allen, and B. Miller. TRAINS-95 : towards a mixed initiative planning assistant. In Proc. of the Third Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems, pages 70-77, May 1996.Google Scholar
- 4.Call for Papers. AAAI spring symposium on adjustable autonomy. www.aaai.org, 1999.Google Scholar
- 5.J. P. Gunderson and W. N. Martin. Effects of uncertainty on variable autonomy in maintenence robots. In Proc. of Agents'99, Workshop on Autonomy Control Software, 1999.Google Scholar
- 6.T. Hartrum and S. Deloach. Design issues for mixed-initiative agent systems. In Proc. of the AAAI workshop on mixed-initiative intelligence, 1999.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7.E. Horvitz, A. Jacobs, and D. Hovel. Attention-sensitive alerting. In Proc. of UAI'99, 1999.Google Scholar
- 8.V. Lesser, M. Atighetchi, B. Benyo, et al. A multi-agent system for intelligent environment control. In Proc. of Agents'99, 1999.Google Scholar
- 9.T. Mitchell, R. Caruana, D. Freitag, J. McDermott, and D. Zabowski. Experience with a learning personal assistant. Communications of the ACM, 37(7), 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.M. L. Puterman. Markov Decision Processes. John Wiley & Sons, 1994.Google Scholar
- 11.D. V. Pynadath, M. Tambe, H. Chalupsky, Y. Arens, et al. Electric elves: Immersing an agent organization in a human organization. In Proc. of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Socially Intelligent Agents, 2000.Google Scholar
- 12.S. Russell and Peter Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 13.J. R. Quinlan. C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 14.M. Tambe. Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 7:83-124, 1997. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15.M. Tambe, D. V. Pynadath, N. Chauvat, A. Das, and G. A. Kaminka. Adaptive agent integration architectures for heterogeneous team members. In Proc. of the ICMAS'2000, pages 301-308, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Adjustable autonomy in real-world multi-agent environments
Recommendations
Towards adjustable autonomy for the real world
Adjustable autonomy refers to entities dynamically varying their own autonomy, transferring decision-making control to other entities (typically agents transferring control to human users) in key situations. Determining whether and when such transfers-...
An Adjustable Autonomy Management Module for Multi-agent Systems
AbstractThe design and development of software agents that perform adjustable autonomous actions in dynamic environments is a challenging research issue. Adjustable autonomous agents operate according to a spectrum of autonomy states. The autonomy states ...
An Adjustable-Autonomy Agent for Intelligent Environments
IE '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Sixth International Conference on Intelligent EnvironmentsAutonomy of embedded agents in intelligent environments is highly debated topic; while some believe that agents should have very minimal autonomy and should only act as directly instructed by the user, others consider providing agents with autonomy to ...
Comments