ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Quantum walks on graphs
Full text PdfPdf (257 KB)
Source Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing archive
Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing table of contents
Hersonissos, Greece
Pages: 50 - 59  
Year of Publication: 2001
ISBN:1-58113-349-9
Authors
Sponsor
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 52,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/380752.380758
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We set the ground for a theory of quantum walks on graphs-the generalization of random walks on finite graphs to the quantum world. Such quantum walks do not converge to any stationary distribution, as they are unitary and reversible. However, by suitably relaxing the definition, we can obtain a measure of how fast the quantum walk spreads or how confined the quantum walk stays in a small neighborhood. We give definitions of mixing time, filling time, dispersion time. We show that in all these measures, the quantum walk on the cycle is almost quadratically faster then its classical correspondent. On the other hand, we give a lower bound on the possible speed up by quantum walks for general graphs, showing that quantum walks can be at most polynomially faster than their classical counterparts.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
[4] A. Childs, E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, An example of a difference between quantum and classical random walks. LANL preprint http://www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0103020.
 
5
[5] E. Farhi, S. Gutmann, Quantum computation and decision trees, Physical Review A, 58: 915-928, 1998.
6
 
7
[7] L. Lovasz and P. Winkler, Mixing times, in Microsurveys in Discrete Probability, Dimacs Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, 41, eds. D. Aldous and J. Propp.
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11

CITED BY  10
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Dorit Aharonov: colleagues
Andris Ambainis: colleagues
Julia Kempe: colleagues
Umesh Vazirani: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: