skip to main content
10.1145/381448.381453acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdialmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Selecting forwarding neighbors in wireless Ad Hoc networks

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 July 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

Broadcasting is a fundamental operation which is frequent in wireless ad hoc networks. A simple broadcasting mechanism, known as flooding, is to let every node retransmit the message to all its 1-hop neighbors when receiving the first copy of the message. Despite its simplicity, flooding is very inefficient and can result in high redundancy, contention, and collision. One approach to reducing the redundancy is to let each node forward the message only to a small subset of 1-hop neighbors that cover all of the node's 2-hop neighbors. In this paper, we propose two practical heuristics for selecting the minimum number of forwarding neighbors: an Ο(n log n) time algorithm that selects at most 6 times more forwarding neighbors than the optimum, and an Ο(n2) time algorithm with an improved approximation ratio of 3, where n is the number of 1- and 2-hop neighbors. The best previously known algorithm, due to Bronnimann and Goodrich [2], guarantees Ο(1) approximation in Ο(n3 log n) time.

References

  1. 1.J. Broch, D. B. Johnson, and D. A. Maltz, The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks, IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-dsr-05.txt, March 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.H. Bronnimann and M.T. Goodrich, Almost Optimal Set Covers in Finite VC-Dimension. Proc. lOth ACM Syrup. on Computational Geometry (SCG), 1994, 293-302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.V. ChvAtal. A greedy heuristic for the set-covering problem. Mathematics of Operation Research, 4(3):233-235, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4.B. N. Clark, C. J. Colbourn, and D. S. Johnson, "Unit Disk Graphs", Discrete Mathematics, 86:165-177, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.M. GrStschel, L. LovLsz, and A. Schrijver Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, second edition, Springer-Verlag, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Z. J. Haas, M. R. Pearlman, and P. Samar. The Interzone Routing Protocol (IERP) for Ad Hoc Networks, IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-zone-ierp-00.txt, January 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.D. S. Hochbaum and W. Maass, "Approximation schemes for covering and packing problems in imageprocessing and VLSr', Journal of the A CM, 32(1): 130-136, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.H. B. Hunt III, M. V. Marathe, V. Radhakrishnan, S. S. Ravi, D. J. Rosenkrantz, and R. E. Stearns, "NC-Approximation schemes for NP- and PSPACE-hard problems for geometric graphs", Journal of Algorithms, 26(2):238-274, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.P. Jacquet, P. Muhlethaler, A. Qayyum, A. Laouiti, L. Viennot, and T. Clansen, Optimized Link State Routing Protocol, IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-olsr-04.txt, March 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.M. V. Marathe, H. Breu, H. B. Hunt III, S. S. Ravi and D. J. Rosenkrantz, "Simple Heuristics for Unit Disk Graphs", Networks, Vol. 25, 1995, pp. 59-68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11.B.M.E. Moret and H.D. Shapiro. Algorithms from P to NP, Volume I: Design and Efficiency. Benjamin/Cummings, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.S.-Y. Ni, Y.-C. Tseng, Yuh-Shyan Chen, and J.-P. Sheu, The Broadcast Storm Problem in a Mobile Ad Hoc Network", Proceedings of the fifth annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Mobile computing and networking, 1999, Pages 151 - 162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13.C. E. Perkins, E. M. Royer, and S. Das, Ad Hoc On Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing, IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-manet-aodv-08.txt, March 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14.P. Sinha, R. Sivakumar, and B. Vaduvur, Enhancing Ad Hoc Routing with Dynamic Virtual Infrastructures, to appear in IEEE INFOCOM 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Selecting forwarding neighbors in wireless Ad Hoc networks

                    Recommendations

                    Comments

                    Login options

                    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                    Sign in
                    • Published in

                      cover image ACM Conferences
                      DIALM '01: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Discrete algorithms and methods for mobile computing and communications
                      July 2001
                      94 pages
                      ISBN:1581134215
                      DOI:10.1145/381448

                      Copyright © 2001 ACM

                      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                      Publisher

                      Association for Computing Machinery

                      New York, NY, United States

                      Publication History

                      • Published: 21 July 2001

                      Permissions

                      Request permissions about this article.

                      Request Permissions

                      Check for updates

                      Qualifiers

                      • Article

                      Acceptance Rates

                      Overall Acceptance Rate21of68submissions,31%

                    PDF Format

                    View or Download as a PDF file.

                    PDF

                    eReader

                    View online with eReader.

                    eReader