The practitioner from within: revisiting the virtues

Abstract

Traditionally the study of computer ethics involves taking students who are not philosophically trained, exposing them to action-guiding theories, presenting them with the codes of ethics of several companies and professional organizations and asking them to make ethical decisions in scenario-based cases. This approach is deliberately action-based and focuses on doing. "What would you do?" is the traditional question we ask our students. While this pedagogical methodology forces them to examine situations and argue from a particular point of view, it does little to influence their character. They see the utilitarian or deontologist as someone other than themselves. There seems to be very little internalization of these action-based theories.Virtue Ethics offers character-forming theory that has been more successful with my students than the action-based theories of computer ethics texts. Why? Virtue Ethics is directed toward character development. The focus is on being rather than doing. It presents a good heuristic or approach to the problem of moral agency. Virtue ethics offers a way of teaching self-reflection through narratives that focus on core values, heroes and moral exemplars. It is grounded in practical wisdom. It is experiential, learning to care about the self, others, the community, living the good life, flourishing and striving for moral excellence. It offers a model for the development of character and personal ethics which will lead to professional ethics. Yet, the strict Virtue Ethics espoused by Aristotle has its limitations. This paper will explore the need for a more integrative approach to contemporary moral theory, one that may be found by revisiting the virtues through the works of Aristotle and Kant. It will offer insight into translating theory into practice for students of computer science and information technology.

References

1. Aristotle. (1969). The nicomachean ethics of Aristotle. Translated by Sir David Ross. London: Oxford University Press.
2. Artz, J.M. (1998). The role of stories in computer ethics, Computers and Society 28,1. March, 1998, pp. 11-13.
3. Edgar, S. (1997). Morality and Machines. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
4. Johnson, D. (1994). Computer ethics, (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Johnson, D. and Nissenbaum, H. (Eds.), (1995). Computers, ethics and social values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6. Kant, I. (1948). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. Translated and analyzed by H. Paton. London: Hutchinson.
7. Ladd, J. (1995). The quest for a code of professional ethics: an intellectual and moral confusion. Computers, ethics and social values. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp. 580-585.
8. Louden, R. (1992). Morality and moral theory. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
9. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: a study in moral theory. (2nd ed.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
10. MacIntyre, A. (1987). The relationship of philosophy to history: postscript to the second edition of After Virtue. After philosophy: end or transformation?ed. Baynes, Boleman, Mccarthy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 412-422.
11. MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Whose rationality?. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
12. Moor, J.H. (1998). Reason, relativity, and responsibility in computer ethics. Computers and Society. 28, 1. March, 1998, pp. 14-21.
13. Sherman, N. (1997). Making a necessity of virtue: Aristotle and Kant on virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.
16. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press.

Index Terms

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Computing profession

      • Codes of ethics