skip to main content
article
Free Access

On ordered languages and the optimization of linear functions by greedy algorithms

Published:01 October 1985Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The optimization problem for linear functions on finite languages is studied, and an (almost) complete characterization of those functions for which a primal and a dual greedy algorithm work well with respect to a canonically associated linear programming problem is given. The discussion in this paper is within the framework of ordered languages, and the characterization uses the notion of rank feasibility of a weighting with respect to an ordered language. This yields a common generalization of a sufficient condition, obtained recently by Korte and Lovász for greedoids, and the greedy algorithm for ordered sets in Faigel's paper [6]. Ordered greedoids are considered the appropriate generalization of greedoids, and the connection is established between ordered languages, polygreedoids, and Coxeteroids. Answering a question of Björner, the author shows in particular that a polygreedoid is a Coxeteroid if and only if it is derived from an integral polymatroid.

References

  1. 1 BJORNER, A.RUVKA, O.O jistem problemu minimalnim. Prace Moravske Prirodovedecke Spolecnosti 3 (1926), 37-53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 boruvka o jistem problemu minimalnium prace moravske prirodvedeckeGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 CRAPO, H.Selectors: A theory of formal languages, semimodular lattices and shelling processes. Adv. Math. 54 (1984), 233-277.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 EDMONDS, J.Submodular functions, matroids, and certain polyhedra, in Proceedings of the Calgary International Conference on Combinatorial Structure and Their Applications, R. Guy, Ed. Gordon and Breach, New York, 1970, pp. 69-87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 EDMONDS, J. Matroids and the greedy algorithm Math. Progr. 1 (1971), 127-- 136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 FAIGLE, U.The greedy algorithm for partially ordered sets. Discr. Math. 28 (1979), 153-159.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 FAIGLE, U.Geometries on partially ordered sets. J. Combin. Theory B 28 (1980), 26-51.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 FUJISHIGE, S.Submodular systems and related topics. Math. Prog. Stud. 22 (1984), 113-131.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 KORTE, B., AND LOVA, SZ, L.Mathematical structures underlying greedy algorithms. In Fundamentals of Computation Theory, F. Grcseg, Ed. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ,vol. 1.i 7. Springer Verlag, New York, 1981, pp. 205-209. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 KORTE, B., AND LOV/I, SZ, L.Greedoids--A structural framework for the greedy algorithm. In Progress in Combinatorial Optimization, W. R. Pulleyblank. Ed. Academic Press, Toronto, 1984, pp. 221-243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 KORTE, B., AND LOV~,SZ, L.Structural properties of greedoids. Combinatorica 3 (1983), 259-374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 KORTE, B., AND LOVASZ, L. Greedoids and linear objective functions. SIAM J. Algor. Discrete Meth. 2(1984), 229-238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 STOER, J., AND WITZGALL, C.Convexity and optimization in finite dimensions, vol. I. Springer Vedag, New York, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On ordered languages and the optimization of linear functions by greedy algorithms

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Journal of the ACM
          Journal of the ACM  Volume 32, Issue 4
          Oct. 1985
          234 pages
          ISSN:0004-5411
          EISSN:1557-735X
          DOI:10.1145/4221
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1985 ACM

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 October 1985
          Published in jacm Volume 32, Issue 4

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader