skip to main content
10.1145/501516.501573acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdocConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

The changing face of technical communication: new directions for the field in a new millennium

Published:21 October 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this panel session, the authors identify four different factors shaping the future of technical communication: user-centered design, corporate universities, cross-disciplinary collaboration, and knowledge management. The authors each address how factors once considered external to the field of technical communication are now becoming thoroughly integrated with it. These four studies, in conjunction, suggest how the field of technical communication is becoming increasingly complex and how participants (practitioners, researchers, and educators) will need to adapt to this new terrain.

References

  1. 1.Anklam, P. "Technical communication as knowledge management: Evolution of a profession." 17th Annual International Conference of Computer Documentation Conference Proceedings (1999), 36-44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2.Artemeva, N., and Freedman, A. "Just the boys playing on computers': An activity theory analysis of differences in the cultures of two engineering firms." Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15.2 (2001), 164-94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. 3.Barton, E. "Design in observational research on the discourse of medicine: Toward interdisciplinarity." Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15.3 (2001), 309-332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4.Bourdieu, P. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Burt, K. L., and Ryan, C. L. "An investigation of the effects of medication and the use of computerized feedback in task performance of AD/HD children." Issues in Special Education & Rehabilitation 12.1 (1997), 56-70.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Carlson, P. "Information technology and organizational change." 17 th Annual International Conference of Computer Documentation Conference Proceedings (1999), 26-35. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Conklin, J. "The next step: An integrated approach to computer documentation.' Technical Communication 40.1 (1993), 89- 96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Davenport, T., and Prusak, L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Davis, S., and Botkin, J. The Monster Under the Bed. New York: Touchstone, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Diagnosis and treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. NIH Consensus Statement Online 16.2 (1998), 1-37. http://odp.od.nih.gov/consensus/cons/110/110_statement.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Dodgson, M. Organizational learning: A review of some literatures. Organization Studies 14.3 (1993), 375-394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. 12.Doheny-Farina, S. Rhetoric, Innovation, and Technology: Case Studies of Technical Communication in Technology Transfers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Drucker, P. "The coming of the new organization.' Harvard Business Review 45 (January-February 1988).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Drucker, P. Post-capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.DuPaul, G. J., and Eckert, T. L. "Academic interventions for students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A review of literature." Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties 14 (1998), 59-82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. 16.Edelman, M. "The value added by technical communicators." Intercom (April 2001), 11-13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Eurich, N. The Learning Industry: Education for Adult Workers. Princeton: Carnegie Foundation, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Ferretti, R. P., and Okolo, C. M. "Authenticity in learning: multimedia design projects in the social studies for students with disabilities." Journal of Learning Disabilities 29.5 (1996), 450-461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. 19.Ford, M. J., Poe, V., and Cox, J. "Attending behaviors of ADHD children in math and reading using various types of software." Journal of Childhood Education 4.2 (1993), 183- 196.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Freeman, C., and Perez, C. "Structural crises of adjustment: Business cycles and investment behavior." Technical Change and Economic Theory. G. Dosi et al. (eds.), 38-66. London: Pinter, 1988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Gartner, Inc. "Wanted: Clear standards for CRM." Gartner IT Management Reports (March 7, 2001). Available at http://www.techrepublic.com/article.jhtml?id=r00720010307g gp01.htm&fromtm=e105-3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Gauggel, S., and Neimann, T. ""Evaluation of a short-term computer-assisted training programme for the remediation of attentional deficits after brain injury: A preliminary study." International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 19 (1996), 229-239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Gee, J., Hull, G., and Lankshear, C. The New Work Order. Sydney: Allen & Unwin, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Geisler, C., et al. "IText: Future directions for research on the relationship between information technology and writing." Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15.3 (2001), 269-308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. 25.Grant, R. "Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm." Strategic Management Journal 17 (1996), 109-122.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. 26.Hailey, Jr., D. E., and Hailey, C. "Hypermedia, multimedia, and reader cognition: An empirical study." Technical Communication 45.3 (1998), 330-342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Hall, R. "A framework for linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage." Strategic Management Journal 14 (1993), 607-618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. 28.Harrison, T. M., and Debs, M. B. "Conceptualizing the organizational role of technical communicators: A systems approach." Journal of Business and Technical Communication 2.2, 5-21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.Hawthorne, E. M., Libby, P. A., and Nash, N. S. "The emergence of corporate colleges." Journal of Continuing Higher Education 2.9 (1983).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.Hayhoe, G. "Technical communication: A trivial pursuit?' Technical Communication 46.1 (February 1999), 23-5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.Helmar, R. Customer relationship management myths (November 1999). http://www.argo-navis. com/consulting/crm-myths.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.Herndl, C. "The transformation of critical ethnography into pedagogy, or the vicissitudes of traveling theory." In A. H. Duin and C. Hansen (eds.), Non-Academic Writing: Social Theory and Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.Horton, W. "Let's do away with manuals . . . before they do away with us." Technical Communication 40.1 (1993), 26-34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.Johnson, R. "Complicating technology: Interdisciplinary method, the burden of comprehension, and the ethical space of the technical communicator." Technical Communication Quarterly 7.1 (1998), 75-98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. 35.Johnson, R. User-centered Technology: A Rhetorical Theory for Computers and Other Mundane Artifacts. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. 36.Johnson-Eilola, J. "Relocating the value of work: Technical communication in a post-industrial age." Technical Communication Quarterly 5.3 (1996), 245-270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. 37.Kleiman, G., Humphrey, M., and Lindsay, P. H. "Microcomputers and hyperactive children." Creative Computing 7 (1981), 93-94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.Lam, A. 'Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and societal institutions: An integrated framework." Organization Studies 21.3 (2000) 487-513.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.McKeown, M. E-customer: Customers just got faster and smarter. New York: Financial Times-Prentice Hall, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. 40.Micklethwait, J., and Wooldridge, A. A future perfect: The essentials of globalization. Crown Business, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.Moore, T. "The corporate university: Transforming management education." Accounting Horizons 11 (1997) 77- 85.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.Najjar, L. J. "Multimedia information and learning." Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 5 (1996), 129-150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. 43.Newell, F. Loyalty.com: Customer Relationship Management in the New Era of Internet Marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. 44.Nykamp, M. The Customer Differential. New York: Amacon, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.Pedler, M., Boydell, T., and Burgoyne, J. "Towards the learning company." Management Education and Development 20.1 (1989) 1-8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. 46.Reich, R. The Work of Nations. New York: Vintage, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.Reich, R. The Future of Success. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.Schachar, R., Tannock, R., Marriott, M., and Logan, G. "Deficient inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder." Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 23.4 (1995), 411-437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. 49.Schriver, K. A. "Document design from 1980-1989: Challenges that remain." Technical Communication 36 (1989), 316-31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.Schumann, D. A. On the cutting edge: CRM systems (December 2000). http://www.sheshunoff.com/email/archive/oper40p.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.Shaw, G.A., and Giambra, L. "Task-unrelated thoughts of college students diagnosed as hyperactive in childhood." Developmental Neuropsychology 9.1 (1993), 17-30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. 52.Smith, E. O. "Points of reference in technical communication scholarship." Technical Communication Quarterly 9.4 (2000), 427-453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. 53.Smith, E. O. "Strengths in the technical communication journals and diversity in the serials cited." Journal of Business and Technical Communication 14.2 (2000), 131-84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. 54.Spinuzzi, C. "Toward integrating our research scope: A sociocultural field methodology.' Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 2002 (in press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.Spinuzzi, C., and Zachry, M. "Genre ecologies: An open-system approach to understanding and constructing documentation." Journal of Computer Documentation 24.3 (2000), 169-181. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. 56.Swaddling, D. C., and Miller, C. Customer Power: How to Grow Sales and Profits in a Customer-driven Marketplace. Dublin, OH: The Wellington Press, 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.Thompson, G. "Unfulfilled prophecy: The evolution of corporate colleges." Journal of Higher Education 71.3 (2000), 322-241.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.Ullman, E. Close to the Machine: Technophilia and its Discontents. San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.Wick, C. "Knowledge management and leadership opportunities for technical communicators." Technical Communication 47.4 (2000), 515-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.Womack J. D., Jones, D., and Roos, D. The Machine that Changed the World. New York: Rawson, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.Zachry, M. "Management discourse and popular narratives: The myriad plots of total quality management." Narrative and Professional Communication. N. R. Blyler and J. M. Perkins (eds). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1999. 107-120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.Zentall, S. S., Smith, Y. N., Lee, Y B., and Wieczorek, C. "Mathematical outcomes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder." Journal of Learning Disabilities 27.8 (1994), 510- 519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. 63.Zimmerman, M. "Technical communication in an altered technology landscape: What might be." Technical Communication 48.2 (2001), 200-205.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The changing face of technical communication: new directions for the field in a new millennium

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader