Interacting at a distance: measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices

ABSTRACT

It is difficult to interact with computer displays that are across the room. A popular approach is to use laser pointers tracked by a camera, but interaction techniques using laser pointers tend to be imprecise, error-prone, and slow. Although many previous papers discuss laser pointer interaction techniques, none seem to have performed user studies to help inform the design. This paper reports on two studies of laser pointer interactions that answer some of the questions related to interacting with objects using a laser pointer. The first experiment evaluates various parameters of laser pointers. For example, the time to acquire a target is about 1 second, and the jitter due to hand unsteadiness is about ±8 pixels, which can be reduced to about ±2 to ±4 pixels by filtering. We compared 7 different ways to hold various kinds of laser pointers, and found that a laser pointer built into a PalmOS device was the most stable. The second experiment compared 4 different ways to select objects on a large projected display. We found that tapping directly on a wall-size SmartBoard was the fastest and most accurate method, followed by a new interaction technique that copies the area of interest from the big screen to a handheld. Third in speed was the conventional mouse, and the laser pointer came in last, with a time almost twice as long as tapping on the SmartBoard

REFERENCES

• 1: Stuart K. Card , Allen Newell , Thomas P. Moran, The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1983
• 2: Richard R. Eckert , Jason A. Moore, The classroom of the 21st century: The interactive learning wall, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, v.32 n.2, p.33-40, April 2000 [doi>10.1145/360405.360438]
• 3: Fitts, P.M., "The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling amplitude of movement." Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1954. 47: pp. 381--391.
• 4: Horn, G.A.V., "Proxima's new Ovation+ projection panels do up multimedia." Byte (on-line), 1995. http://www.byte.com/art/9501/sec12/art9.htm.
• 5: Carsten Kirstein , Heinrich Mueller, Interaction with a Projection Screen Using a Camera-tracked Laser Pointer, Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on MultiMedia Modeling, p.191, October 12-15, 1998
• 6: I. Scott MacKenzie , Shaidah Jusoh, An Evaluation of Two Input Devices for Remote Pointing, Proceedings of the 8th IFIP International Conference on Engineering for Human-Computer Interaction, p.235-250, May 11-13, 2001
• 7: Brad A. Myers, Using handhelds and PCs together, Communications of the ACM, v.44 n.11, p.34-41, Nov. 2001 [doi>10.1145/384150.384159]
• 8: Brad A. Myers , Choon Hong Peck , Jeffrey Nichols , Dave Kong , Robert Miller, Interacting at a Distance Using Semantic Snarfing, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Ubiquitous Computing, p.305-314, September 30-October 02, 2001, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
• 9: Dan R. Olsen, Jr. , Travis Nielsen, Laser pointer interaction, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.17-22, March 2001, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/365024.365030]
• 10: Symbol Technologies, "SPT 1700 Pocketable Computers," 2001. http://www.symbol.com/products/mobile_computers/mobile_palm_pi_hdwr_spt1700.html.
• 11: Mark Weiser, Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing, Communications of the ACM, v.36 n.7, p.75-84, July 1993 [doi>10.1145/159544.159617]
• 12: Terry Winograd , François Guimbretière, Visual instruments for an interactive mural, CHI '99 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania [doi>10.1145/632716.632861]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.4 Graphics Utilities
          Subjects: Virtual device interfaces

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Screen design (e.g., text, graphics, color)

  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.6 Methodology and Techniques
          Subjects: Interaction techniques

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Performance, Theory

Keywords:
handhelds, input devices, interaction techniques, laser pointers, palm pilots, pebbles, remote interaction, user studies