skip to main content
10.1145/503376.503459acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Cognitive walkthrough for the web

Published:20 April 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes a transformation of the Cognitive Walkthrough (CW), a theory-based usability inspection method that has proven useful in designing applications that support use by exploration. The new Cognitive Walkthrough for the Web (CWW) is superior for evaluating how well websites support users' navigation and information search tasks. The CWW uses Latent Semantic Analysis to objectively estimate the degree of semantic similarity (information scent) between representative user goal statements (100-200 words) and heading/link texts on each web page. Using an actual website, the paper shows how the CWW identifies three types of problems in web page designs. Three experiments test CWW predictions of users' success rates in accomplishing goals, verifying the value of CWW for identifying these usability problems

References

  1. Accrue Insight. http://www.accrue.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. The Atomic Components of Thought. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Berland, G.K. at al. Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2612--2621, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Byrne, M. D., John, B. E., Wehrle, N. S., & Crow, D. C. The tangled Web we wove: A taskonomy of WWW use. In Proceedings of CH'99, ACM Press, 544--551, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chi, E., Pirolli, P., & Pitkow, J. The scent of a site: A system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a web site. In Proceedings of CHI 2000, 161--168, ACM Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Chi, E., Pirolli, P., Chen, K., & Pitkow, J. Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web. In Proceedings of CHI 2000, ACM Press, 490--497, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cooper, M. Evaluating accessibility and usability of web pages. In Proceedings of 2nd Int. Conference on Computer-Aided Design of User Interfaces, Kluwer Academics, 33--42, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cooper, A. The Inmates are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How To Restore the Sanity. Macmillan Publishing Co., 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. E-marketing.Com: http://www.e-marketing.com.au/ documents/useabilityintro.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Furnas, G. W. Effective view navigation. In Proceedings of CHI'97, ACM Press, 367--374, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gamble, P. E. Does Link Label Length and Content Affect Web User Performance? Unpublished Senior Honor's Thesis, Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Huberman, B. A., Pirolli, P., Pitkow, J., & Lukose, R. Strong regularities in World Wide Web surfing. Science, 280, 95--97, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Instone, K. STRESS-TEST your favorite, or least favorite website. Michigan Ohio Computer-Human Interaction Meetings (March 14, 2001); find Navigation Stress Test also at http://keith.instone.org/navstress/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kintsch, W. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition, Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Kitajima, M. & Polson, P. G. A comprehension-based model of exploration, Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 345--389, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Kitajima, M., Blackmon, M. H., & Polson, P. G. A Comprehension-based model of Web navigation and its application to Web usability analysis. In People and Computers XIV, Springer, 357--373, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211--240, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Larson, K., & Czerwinski, M. Web page design: Implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval. In Proceedings of CHI'98, ACM Press, 25--32, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lewis, C., Polson, P., Wharton, C., & Rieman, J. Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces. In Proceedings of CHI'90, ACM Press, 235--241, 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Morrison, J. B., Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. A taxonomic analysis of what World Wide Web activates significantly impact people's decisions and actions. UIR Technical Report UIR-R-2000-17, Xerox PARC, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Newell, A. & Card, S. K. The prospects for psychological science in human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 1, 209--242, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nielsen, J. Designing Web Usability, Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Nielsen, J. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/991212.html, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nielsen, J. & Mack, R. L. Usability Inspection Methods, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pirolli, P. Computational models of information scent-following in a very large browsable text collection. In Proceedings of CHI'97, ACM Press, 3--10, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pirolli, P. & Card, S. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643--675, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Pitkow, J. & Pirolli, P. Mining longest repeated subsequences to predict World Wide Web surfing. In Proceedings of the USENIX Conference on Internet, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Polson, P. G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., & Wharton, C. Cognitive walkthroughs: A method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36, 741--773, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Rieman, J., Young, R. M., & Howes, A. A dual-space model of iteratively deepening exploratory learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 44, 743--775, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Tauscher, L. & Greenberg, S. How people revisit web pages: Empirical findings and implication for the design of history systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 47, 97--137, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. WebCriteria SiteProfile. http://www.webcriteria.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C., & Polson, P. The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 105--140, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Wolfe, M. B., Schreiner, M. E., Rehder, B., Laham, D., Foltz, P. W., Kintsch, W., & Landauer, T. K. (1998). Learning from text: Matching readers and text by Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 309--336.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cognitive walkthrough for the web

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2002
            478 pages
            ISBN:1581134533
            DOI:10.1145/503376
            • Conference Chair:
            • Dennis Wixon

            Copyright © 2002 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 20 April 2002

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            CHI '02 Paper Acceptance Rate61of414submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader