Preliminary evidence for the effect of automatic responses to authority on information technology diffusion

Abstract

Successful diffusion of IT within an organization can depend on IT use decisions by many individuals. Current rational models focusing on cognitive determinants of such IT use decisions explain 30 to 40 percent of organizational members' use behaviors. This article demonstrates, via a laboratory study, that automatic unthinking responses may be significant in explaining user behavior. We find that automatic responses to authority, that are cued by incentives and controls, may explain more than 20 percent of IT use variance, over and above that accounted for by rational decision making. This suggests interesting opportunities for IT diffusion research, exploring automatic IT use responses resulting from authority, as well as other automatic response generators such as reciprocation and consistency.

References

1. Adams, G. R. (1977), "Physical Attractiveness Research: Toward a Developmental Social Psychology of Beauty," Human Development, Vol. 20, pp. 217-239.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991), "The Theory of Planned Behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, pp. 179-211.
3. Ajzen, I. (1987). "Attitudes, Traits, and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology," in L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 20, New York: Academic Press, pp. 1-63.
4. Arrow, K. (1985). "The Economics of Agency," in J. W. Pratt and R. J. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Principal and Agents: The Structure of Business, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 37-51.
5. Attewell, P. (1992). "Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing," Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-19.
6. Benbasat, I., Dexter, A. S., and Todd, P. (1986). "An Experimental Program Investigating Color-Enhanced and Graphical Information Presentation: An Integration of the Findings," Communication of the ACM, Vol. 29 No. 11, pp. 1094-1105.
7. Blacker, F., and Brown, C. (1985). "Evaluation and Impact of Information Technologies on People in Organizations," Human Relations, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 213-231.
8. Blake, R., and Mouton, J. (1979). "Intergroup Problem Solving in Organizations: From Theory to Practice," in W. Austin and S. Worchel (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole, pp. 151-163.
9. Bodenhausen, G. V,. and Lichtenstein, M. (1987). "Social Stereotypes and Information Processing Strategies," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 871-880.
10. Broeder, D. (1959). "The University of Chicago Jury Project," Nebraska Law Review, Vol. 38, pp. 744-760.
11. Byrne, D. (1971). The Attraction Paradigm, New York: Academic Press.
12. Chin, W. W., and Frye, T. A. (1994). PLS-Graph User's Manual, University of Calgary, Faculty of Management, Alberta, Canada.
13. Cialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: Science and Practice, 3rd Edition, New York: Harper Collins.
14. Cohen, M., and Davis, N. (1981). Medication Errors: Causes and Prevention, Philadelphia, PA: G.F. Stickley Co.
15. Curley, K., and Pyburn, P. (1982), "'Intellectual Technologies: The Key to Improving White Collar Productivity," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 31-40.
16. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. (1989). "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
17. DiMaggio, P., and Powell, W. (1991). "Introduction." in W. Powell and P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-38.
18. Driscoll, R., Davis, K. E., Litetz, M. E. (1972). "Parental Interference and Romantic Love: The Romeo and Juliet Effect," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 24, pp. 1-10.
19. Eagly, A. H., and Chaiken, S. (1993). The Psychology of Attitudes, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
20. Eisenhardt, K. (1989). "Agency Theory: A Review and an Assessment," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57-74.
21. Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
22. Foushee, M. C. (1984). "Dyads and Triads at 35,000 Feet: Factors Affecting Group Process and Aircraft Performance," American Psychologist, Vol. 39, pp. 885-893.
23. Francik, E., Rudman, S. E., Cooper, D., and Levine, S. (1991). "Putting Innovation to Work: Adoption Strategies for Multimedia Communication Systems," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 35, No. 12, pp. 52-63.
24. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). "The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement," American Sociological Review, Vol. 25, pp. 161-178.
25. Hofling, C. K., Brotzman, E., Dalrymple, S., Graves, N., and Pierce, C. M. (1966). "An Experimental Study of Nurse-Physician Relationships," Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Vol. 143, pp. 171-180
26. Ives, B., and Learmonth, G. (1984). "The Information System as a Competitive Weapon," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 27, No. 12, pp. 1193-1201.
27. Keen, P. G. W. (1981). "Information Systems and Organizational Change," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 24-33.
28. Keen, P. G. W., and Scott-Morton, M. S. (1978). Decision Support Systems: An Organizational Perspective, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Langer, E. J. (1989). "Minding Matters: The Consequences of Mindlessness-Mindfulness," in L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 22, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 137-173.
30. Leonard-Barton, D., and Deschamps, I. (1988). "Managerial Influence in the Implementation of New Technology," Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 1252-1265.
31. Markus, M. L., and Robey, D. (1988). "Information Technology and Organizational Change," Management Science, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 583-598.
32. Mathieson, K. (1991). "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 173-191.
33. McIntyre, S. H. (1982). "Experimental Study of the Impact of Judgment Based Marketing Models," Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 17-33.
34. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to Authority, New York: Harper and Row.
35. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. (1991). "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 192-222.
36. Nilakant, V., and Rao, H. (1994). "Agency Theory and Uncertainty in Organizations: An Evaluation," Organization Studies, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 649-672.
37. Rockart, J. F., Earl, M. J., and Ross, J. W. (1996). "Eight Imperatives for the New IT Organization," Sloan Management Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 43-55.
38. SAS Institute, Inc. (1990). SAS/Stat Users Guide, Vol. 1 and 2, Cary, NC.
39. Sappington, D. E. M. (1991). "Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships," Journal of Economic Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 45-66.
40. Schwarz, N. (1984). "When Reactance Effects Persist Despite Restoration of Freedom: Investigations of Time Delay and Vicarious Control," European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 14, pp. 405-419.
41. Subramanian, A., and Nilakanta, S. (1994). "Measurement: A Blueprint for Theory-Building in MIS," Information and Management, Vol. 26, pp. 13-20.
42. Szajna, B. A., and Scamell, R. W. (1993). "The Effects of Information System User Expectations on Their Performance and Perceptions," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, No. 4, p. 493.
43. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. (1995). "Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models," Information Systems Research, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 144-176.
44. Trafimow, David (1996). "The Importance of Attitudes in the Prediction of College Students' Intentions to Drink," Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 26, pp. 2167-2188.
45. Triandis, H. C. (1980). "Values, Attitudes, and Interpersonal Behavior", in H. E. Howe, Jr. and M. M. Page (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation --- 1979, Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, Vol. 27, pp. 195-259.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Modeling and simulation

    • Simulation theory

      • Systems theory

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

• Mathematics of computing

  • Information theory

• Social and professional topics

  • Professional topics

    • Management of computing and information systems