skip to main content
10.1145/508530.508549acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnparConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Evaluating space perception in NPR immersive environments

Published:03 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Non-photorealistic rendering (NPR) methods allow us to emphasize or omit detail in order to communicate information more effectively. An important issue to consider is how can we evaluate and validate the communication adequacy of these techniques? In this paper we present a methodology for quantitatively evaluating spatial perception in a functional, NPR, stereo, immersive environment. The methods described in this paper borrow from both the art and perceptual psychology communities and will provide NPR researchers with a methodology for conducting user studies to perceptually validate new rendering approaches within immersive environments.

References

  1. BILLINGHURST, M., AND WEGHORST, S. 1995. The use of sketch maps to measure cognitive maps of virtual environments. Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, 40-47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. CUTTING, J. E., AND VISHTON, P. M. 1995. Perceiving layout and knowing distance: The integration, relative potency and contextual use of different information about depth. In Perceptual of Space and Motion, W. Epstein and S. Rogers, Eds. Academic Press, New York, 69-117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. FERWERDA, J. 2001. Hi-fi rendering. In Perceptually Adaptive Graphic, Preconference Proceedings, A. McNamara and C. O'Sullivan, Eds. ACM Campfire. http://isg.cs.tcd.ie/gap/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. GOOCH, B., AND GOOCH, A. 2001. Non-Photorealistic Rendering. AK Peters Ltd, July. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. HEALEY, C. G., INTERRANTE, V., KREMERS, D., LAIDLAW, D., , AND RHEINGANS, P. 2001. Nonphotorealistic rendering in scientific visualization. In SIGGRAPH 2001 Course Notes Nonphotorealistic Rendering in Scientific Visualization, C. G. Healey, Ed. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. INTERRANTE, V. 1996. Illustrating Transparency: communicating the 3D shape of layered transparent surfaces via texture. PhD thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. KNAPP, J. M. 1999. The visual perception of egocentric distance in virtual environments. PhD thesis, University of California Santa Barbara.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. LAMPTON, D. R., MCDONALD, D. P., SINGER, M., AND BLISS, J. P. 1995. Distance estimation in virtual environments. In Human Factor and Ergonomics Society, 1268-1272.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. LOOMIS, J. M., AND KNAPP, J. M. in press. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In Virtual and Adaptive Environments, L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas, Eds. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. LOOMIS, J. M., DA SILVA, J. A., FUJITA, N., AND FUKUSIMA, S. S. 1992. Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 906-921.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. M. W. DIXON, M. WRAGA, D. P., AND WILLIAMS, G. 2000. Eye height scaling of absolute size in immersive and nonimmersive displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, 2, 582-593.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. PALMER, S. E. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. The MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. PHILBECK, J. W., AND LOOMIS, J. M. 1997. Comparison of two indicators of perceived egocentric distance under full-cue and reduced-cue conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23, 1, 72-85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. PHILBECK, J. W., LOOMIS, J. M., AND BEALL, A. C. 1997. Visually perceived location is an invariant in the control of action. Perception and Psychophysics 59, 4, 601-612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. RASKAR, R., AND COHEN, M. 1999. Image Precision Silhouette Edges. In Proc. 1999 ACM Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. RIESER, J. J., ASHMEAD, D. H., TAYLOR, C. R., AND YOUNGQUIST, G. A. 1990. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19, 675-689.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. ROBINS, N., 1997. Smooth Normal Generation with Preservation of Edges. www.pobox.com/ nate/smooth.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. ROGERS, S. 1995. Perceiving pictorial space. In Perception of Space and Motion. Academic Press, Inc, ch. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. SPSS, 2002. http://www.spss.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. WANN, J. P., RUSHTON, S., AND MON-WILLIAMS, M. 1995. Natural problems for stereoscopic depth perception in virtual environments. Vision Research 35, 19, 2731-2736.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. WILLEMSEN, P., AND GOOCH, A. 2002. Perceived distance in virtual environments: An experimental comparison between real, image-based, and traditional virtual environments. In To appear in Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. WITMER, B. G., AND KLINE, P. B. 1998. Judging perceived and traversed distance in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 2 (April), 144-167. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Evaluating space perception in NPR immersive environments

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        NPAR '02: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on Non-photorealistic animation and rendering
        June 2002
        150 pages
        ISBN:1581134940
        DOI:10.1145/508530

        Copyright © 2002 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 3 June 2002

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader