skip to main content
10.1145/512976.512999acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespoplConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Computer assisted application definition

Published:01 January 1975Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a system being developed to bridge the gap between an application program and a user inexperienced in the ways of computers. The user explores the characteristics of the available programs by a natural language dialogue with the system. The dialogue is supported by a knowledge base covering both the program semantics and the application domain. This paper addresses the problems of representation and inference involved in this approach and describes our solution for them.

References

  1. Balzer, Robert M., A Global View of Automatic Programming, 3IJCAI, Stanford, August 1973, 494-499.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Balzer, Robert., M et al., Domain-Independent Automatic Programming, USC/Information Sciences Institute, ISI-RR-73-14, January 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Hammer, M., M., Howe, W. G., and Wladawsky, I., An Interactive Business Definition System, SIGPLAN Symposium on Very High Level Languages, March 1974. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Hewitt, Carl, PLANNER, A Language for Proving Theorems in Robots, 1IJCAI, Washington, D. C., 1969, 295-301.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Heidorn, G. E., Natural Language Inputs to a Simulation Programming System, Technical Report NPS-55HD72101A, Naval Postgraduate School, October 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. IBM Application Customizer Service Application Description, Form number GH20-0628.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Martin, William A., OWL, A System for Building Expert Problem Solving Systems Involving Verbal Reasoning, Course 6.871 Notes, MIT, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Martin, William A., Project MAC Progress Report X, July 1972 - July 1973, "Automatic Programming", 170-192.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. McDermott, Drew V., and Sussman, Gerald Jay, The Conniver Reference Manual, MIT Artificial Intelligence Memo No. 259, May 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Moore, J., and Newell, A., How can Merlin Understand?, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, November 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Schank, Roger C., The Fourteen Primitive Actions and their Inferences, Stanford AI Lab. Memo AIM-183, March 1973. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Schank, Roger, et al., MARGIE: Memory, Analysis, Response Generation, and Inference in English, 3IJCAI, Stanford, 1973, 255-261.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Winograd, Terry, Understanding Natural Language, Academic Press, 1972. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    POPL '75: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of programming languages
    January 1975
    242 pages
    ISBN:9781450373517
    DOI:10.1145/512976

    Copyright © 1975 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 January 1975

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    POPL '75 Paper Acceptance Rate23of100submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate824of4,130submissions,20%

    Upcoming Conference

    POPL '25

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader