skip to main content
10.1145/564376.564389acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Finding relevant documents using top ranking sentences: an evaluation of two alternative schemes

Published:11 August 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present an evaluation of techniques that are designed to encourage web searchers to interact more with the results of a web search. Two specific techniques are examined: the presentation of sentences that highly match the searcher's query and the use of implicit evidence. Implicit evidence is evidence captured from the searcher's interaction with the retrieval results and is used to automatically update the display. Our evaluation concentrates on the effectiveness and subject perception of these techniques. The results show, with statistical significance, that the techniques are effective and efficient for information seeking.

References

  1. P. Borlund. Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation. 56. 1. pp 71--90. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. A.L. Berger and V.O. Mittal. OCELOT: A System for Summarizing Web Pages. Proceedings of 23rd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. pp 144--151. Athens 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. Fowkes and M. Beaulieu. Interactive searching behaviour: Okapi experiment for TREC-8. Proceedings of 22nd BCS-IRSG European Colloquium on IR Research. Electronic Workshops in Computing. Cambridge. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. W. C. Hill, J. D. Hollan, D. Wroblewski, and Tim McCandless. Edit Wear and Read Wear. Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI'92. pp 3-9. 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. B. J. Jansen, A. Spink, and T. Saracevic. Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing and Management. 36. 2. pp 207--227. 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Magennis and C. J. van Rijsbergen. The potential and actual effectiveness of interactive query expansion. Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval pp 324--332. Philadelphia. 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Oard and J. Kim. Implicit feedback for recommender systems. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Recommender System. Madison, Wisconsin. 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Robertson. On term selection for query expansion. Journal of Documentation. 46. pp 359--364. 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. W. White, I. Ruthven and J. M. Jose. The use of implicit evidence for relevance feedback in web retrieval. Proceedings of 24th BCS-IRSG European Colloquium on IR Research. Lecture notes in Computer Science 2291. pp 93--109. Glasgow. 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. R. W. White, J. M. Jose and I. Ruthven. A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching. Information Processing and Management. 2002. in press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Finding relevant documents using top ranking sentences: an evaluation of two alternative schemes

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGIR '02: Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
        August 2002
        478 pages
        ISBN:1581135610
        DOI:10.1145/564376

        Copyright © 2002 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 11 August 2002

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        SIGIR '02 Paper Acceptance Rate44of219submissions,20%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader