skip to main content
10.1145/566282.566321acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesspmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Subdivision-based multilevel methods for large scale engineering simulation of thin shells

Published:17 June 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a multilevel algorithm to accelerate the numerical solution of thin shell finite element problems de-scribed by subdivision surfaces. Subdivision surfaces have become a widely used geometric representation for general curved three dimensional boundary models and thin shells as they provide a compact and robust framework for mod-eling 3D geometry. More recently, the shape functions used in the subdivision surfaces framework have been proposed as candidates for use as finite element basis functions in the analysis and simulation of the mechanical deformation of thin shell structures. When coupled with standard solvers, however, such simulations do not scale well. Run time costs associated with high-resolution simulations (105 degrees of freedom or more) become prohibitive. The main contribution of the paper is to show that the subdivision framework can be used for accelerating such sim-ulations. Specifically the subdivision matrix is used as the intergrid information transfer operator in a multilevel pre-conditioner. The method described in the paper allows the practical simulation or a broad range of problems. Included examples show that the run time of the algorithm presented scales nearly linearly in time with problem size.

References

  1. G. Arden. Approximation Properties of Subdivision Surfaces. PhD thesis, University of Washington, 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. S. Ashby and R. Falgout. A Parallel Multigrid Preconditioned Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Groundwater Flow Simulations. Nuclear Science and Engineering, (124):145--159, 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bathe. Finite Element Procedures. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Clffs, N.J., 1996Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. F. Cirak and M. Ortiz. Fully C 1 -conforming subdivision elements for finite deformation thin-shell analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 51(7):813--833, July 2001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. F. Cirak, M. Ortiz, and P. Schröder. Subdivision Surfaces: a New Paradigm for Thin-Shell Finite-Element Analysis. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 47(12):2039--72, April 2000Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. F. Cirak, M. J. Scott, E. Antonsson, M. Ortiz, and P. Schröder. Integrated Modeling, Finite-Element Analysis, and Engineering Design for Thin-Shell Structures using Subdivision Surfaces. PreprintGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Schröder D. Zorin, editor. SIGGRAPH: Subdivision Course Notes, CDROM supplement, 2000Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. W. G. Davids and G. M. Turkiyyah. Multigrid Preconditioner for Unstructured Nonlinear 3D FE Models. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 125(2):186--196, February 1999Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. W. Demmel, S. C. Eisenstat, J. R. Gilbert, X. S. Li, and Joseph W. H. Liu. A supernodal approach to sparse partial pivoting. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 20(3):720--755, 1999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. T. DeRose, M. Kass, and Tien Truong. Subdivision Surfaces in Character Animation. In Computer Graphics (Siggraph 1998 Proceedings), pages 85--94, 1998 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. L. Guibas and J. Stolfi. Primitives for the Manipulation of General Subdivisions and the Compuation of Voronoi Diagrams. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 4(2):74--123, 1985 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. H. Hoppe, T. DeRose, T. Duchamp, M. Halstead, H. Jin, J. McDonald, J. Schweitzer, and W. Stuetzle. Piecewise smooth surface reconstruction. Computer Graphics, 28(Annual Conference Series):295--302, 1994 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. C. Loop. Smooth Subdivision Surfaces Based on Triangles. Master's thesis, University of Utah, 1987Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Mandal, H. Qin, and B. C. Vemuri. A novel fem=based dynamic framework for subdivision surfaces. In Sixth ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications. ACM Press, 1999 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. C. Meza and R. S. Tuminaro. A Multigrid Preconditioner for the Semiconductor Equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 17(1):118--132, January 1996 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. I. D. Parsons and J. F. Hall. The Multigrid Method in Solid Mechanics: Part I - Algorithm Description and Behavior. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 29:719--737, 1990Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Hong Qin, Chhandomay Mandal, and Baba C. Vemuri. Dynamic catmull-clark subdivision surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 4(3):215--229, 1998 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Y. Saad. Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems. PWS Publishing Company, Boston, MA, 1996 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. C. Simo and D. D. Fox. On A Stress Resultant Geometrically Exact Shell Model. Part I: Formulation and Optimal Parameterization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 72:267--304, 1989 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Stam. Exact Evaluation of Catmull-Clark Subdivision Surfaces at Arbitrary Parameter Values. In Computer Graphics, pages 395--404. ACM, 1998 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Stam. Exact Evaluation of Loop Triangular Subdivision Surfaces at Arbitrary Parameter Values. In Computer Graphics. ACM, 1998. CD-ROM SupplementGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. G. Taubin. Is This A Quadrisected Mesh? In D. C. Anderson and K. Lee, editors, Sixth ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, pages 261--266. ACM Press, 2001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. U. Trottenberg, C. Oosterlee, and A. Schüller. Multigrid. Academic Press, London, UK, 2001 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. P. Schröder U. Reif. Curvature integrability of subdivision surfaces. Advances in Computational Mathematics, 14(2):157--174, 2001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. D. Zorin. Stationary Subdivision and Multiresolution Surface Representation. PhD thesis, Cal.Tech., 1998 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Subdivision-based multilevel methods for large scale engineering simulation of thin shells

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SMA '02: Proceedings of the seventh ACM symposium on Solid modeling and applications
        June 2002
        424 pages
        ISBN:1581135068
        DOI:10.1145/566282
        • Conference Chairs:
        • Hans-Peter Seidel,
        • Vadim Shapiro,
        • Program Chairs:
        • Kunwoo Lee,
        • Nick Patrikalakis

        Copyright © 2002 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 June 2002

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        SMA '02 Paper Acceptance Rate43of93submissions,46%Overall Acceptance Rate86of173submissions,50%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader