Suzanne Rivard
Abstract
Ever since firms started using computers for processing their business data, researchers and practitioners have been preoccupied by the successful implementation of information systems (IS). Over the years, researchers have studied several aspects of IS implementation, be it measuring success or developing and testing models that explain IS project success or failure. However, up to now, few IS implementation studies have focused on the role played by the project leader. This paper presents the results of a study of 139 IS project managers. The study examined both the tactics adopted by these project managers to influence people, and their level of decision authority. It then attempted to determine if these two characteristics varied along with the project's organizational structure. The findings of the study point to the mediating role played by project managers' level of decision authority in linking organization structures to influence tactics. While influence tactics used do not vary across project structures, they do so across various levels of decision authority. In turn, the level of authority of project leaders varies across structures and steadily increases on the functional-project continuum. Three influence profiles emerged from the study, namely, the humanist, the political and the authoritarian project manager, providing further interpretation to influence tactics and behavior in an IS development context.
- Ansari, M. A. and Kapoor, A. (1987) "Organizational Context and Upward Influence Tactics," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, (40), pp.39-49.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Barki, H. and Hartwick, J. (1994)."User Participation, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution: The Mediating Roles of Influence," Information Systems Research, (5:4), pp.422-439.Google Scholar
- Cash, C. H. and Fox, R. II (1992) "Elements of Successful Project Management," Journal of Systems Management, (43: 9), p.10.Google Scholar
- Computerworld (1997). "Project Management Top Guns," (31:42), pp.108-109.Google Scholar
- DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. (1992). "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research,(3:1), pp.60-95.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Denis, H. (1985) Le fonctionnement de l'organisation matricielle dans la gestion de projets d'ingénierie, École Polytechnique, Montréal, EPM/RT-85-11 (March).Google Scholar
- Edgemon, J. (1995) "Right Stuff: How to Recognize it when Selecting a Project Manager," Application Development Trends, (2:5), pp.37-42.Google Scholar
- Eres, M. and Rim, Y. (1982) "The Relationship Between Goals, Influence Tactics, and Personal and Organizational Variables," Human Relations, (35), pp.877-878.Google Scholar
- Fornell, C. R. and Bookstein, F. L. (1982). "Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLSGoogle Scholar
- Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory," Journal of Marketing Research, (19),pp. 440-452.Google Scholar
- Fornell, C. R. and Larcker, D. F. (1981). "Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error," Journal of Marketing Research, (18), pp. 39-50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- French, J. R. P. and Raven, B. (1959). "The Bases of Social Power," in Cartwright, D. (Ed.), Studies in Social Power, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
- Galbraith, J. R. (1971). "Matrix Organization Designs: How to Combine Functional and Project Forms," Business Horizons, (14:1), pp.29-40.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hajek, V. G. (1984). "Matrix Management for Engineering Projects," in Cleland, D. I., Matrix Management Systems Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 56-70.Google Scholar
- Hartwick, J. and Barki, H. (1994). "Explaining the Role of Use Participation in Information System Use," Management Science, (40:4), pp.440-466. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jiang, J. and Marguilis, S. (1998). "Important Behavioral Skills for IS Project Managers: The Judgments of Experienced IS Professionals," Project Management Journal, (29:1), pp.39-43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karaa, F. A. and Abdallah, B. (1991). "Coordination Mechanisms During the Construction Project Life Cycle, "Project Management Journal, (22:3), pp. 45-53.Google Scholar
- Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., and Wilkinson, I. (1980). "Intraorganizational Influence Tactics : Explorations in Getting One's Way," Journal of Applied Psychology, (65), pp.440-452.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Larson, E. W. and Gobeli, D. H. (1985). "Project Management Structures: Is There a Common Language?" Project Management Journal, pp. 40-44.Google Scholar
- Larson, E. W. and Gobeli, D. H. (1987). "Matrix Management: Contradictions and Insights," California Management Review, (29:4), pp. 126-138.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Larson, E. W., Gobeli, D. H. and Gray, C. F. (1991) "Application of Project Management by Small Businesses to Develop New Products and Services," Journal of Small Business Management, (April), pp. 30-41.Google Scholar
- Lucas, Jr., H. C., Ginzberg, M. J., Schultz, R. L. (1990). Information Systems Implementation : Testing a Structural Model. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mowday, R. T. (1978). "The Exercise of Upward Influence in Organizations," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.23, pp.137-156.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Naylor, T. H. (1986). The Corporate Strategy Matrix, Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, 2nd edition, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Peterssen, N. (1991). "What Do We Know About the Effective Project Manager," Project Management, (9:2), pp.99-104.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rossy, G. L. and Archibald, R. D. (1992). "Building Commitment in Project Teams," Project Management Journal, (23:2), pp. 5-14.Google Scholar
- Schriesheim, C., Hinkin, T. R. (1990). "Influence Tactics Used by Subordinates : A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis and Refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt and Wilkinson Subscales," Journal of Applied Psychology, (75), pp.246-257.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stuckenbruck, L. C. (1981). The Implementation of Project Management: The Professional's Handbook, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Thamhain, H. J., Gemill, G. R. (1974). "Influence Styles of Project Managers: Some Project Performance Correlates," Academy of Management Journal, (17:2), pp.216-224.Google Scholar
- Vecchio, R. P., Sussman, M. (1991). "Choice of Influence Tactics: Individual and Organizational Determinants," Journal of Organizational Behavior, (121), pp.73-80.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Youker, R. (1979). "Organizing Alternatives for Project Managers," Management Review, (68:4), pp.58-61.Google Scholar
- Yukl, G. (1989). "Managerial Leadership: A Review of Theory and Research," Journal of Management, (15:5), pp.251-289.Google Scholar
- Yukl, G., Falbe, C. M. (1990). "Influence Tactics in Upward, Downward, and Lateral Influence Attempts," Journal of Applied Psychology, (76), pp.416-423.Google Scholar
- Yukl, G., Lepsinger, R., Lucia, T. (1992), "Preliminary Report in the Development and Validation of the Influence Behavior Questionnaire," in Clark, K. and Clark, M. (eds.), The Impact of Leadership, Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership, pp.417-427.Google Scholar
- Yukl, G., Tracey, J. B. (1992). "Consequences of Influence Tactics Used with Subordinates, Peers and the Boss," Journal of Applied Psychology, (77:4), pp.525-535.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Project manager's influence tactics and authority: a comparison across project structures
Recommendations
Understanding the link between IT project manager skills and project success research in progress
SIGCPR '00: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR conference on Computer personnel researchSuccess in information systems project implementations remains an elusive goal for many organizations. One factor contributing to project outcomes is the skills employed by the IT project manager. This study develops a literature based model which seeks ...
Correlation between soft organizational features and development of ICT infrastructure
BCI '12: Proceedings of the Fifth Balkan Conference in InformaticsThis paper aims to research interrelationships between management style as soft organizational trait and development of ICT infrastructure in company as a prerequisite for corporate ICT adoption. Among large set of factors influencing rate of corporate ...
Influence tactics in virtual teams
Virtual team members use FtF influence tactics in new ways with ICT.Ambiguity reduction techniques is a new influence tactic in virtual teams.Lower status virtual team members successfully influenced higher status members.Peer virtual team members were ...
Comments