skip to main content
10.1145/57216.57237acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

An update measure of supervisor-rated job performance for programmer/analysis

Published:01 May 1988Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this research an updated measure of job performance is proposed. The measure is based on the work of Arvey and Hoyle (1974) and is modified to meet the changes in MIS jobs over the last several years. The eighteen item job performance measure was given to 238 programmer/analysts and their supervisors at a large company. A factor analysis of the items yielded a five factor model of performance composed of: overall performance, communication skills, job attitude, business knowledge, and technical skills. The factors were found to be both reliable and valid. Relationships among the factors, and between the factors and both demographic variables and work satisfaction, are explored.

References

  1. Arvey, R.D. and Hoyle, J.C., A Guttman Approach to the Development of Behaviorally Based Rating Scales for Systems Analysts and Programmer/Analysts, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, Volume 59, Number 1, pages 61-68.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Campbell, D., and Fiske, D. Convergent and Discriminant Validity by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix, Psychological Bulletin, Volume 56, 1959, 81-105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Guinan, P.J. and Bostrom, R,P,, Communication Behaviors of Highly-Rated Versus Lowly Rated Systems Developers, Institute for Research on the Management of Information Systems, Working Paper #W707, Indiana University, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Iaffaldano, M.T. and Muchinsky, P.M., Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis, PsycholoKica! Bulletin, 1985, Volume 97, Number 2, pages 251-273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuchner, W.K., Relationships Between Supervisory and Subordinate Ratings for Technical Personnel, Journal of Industrial Psychology, 1966, Volume 3, pages 57-60.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Lawler, E.E. III, The Multitrait-Multirater Approach to Measuring Managerial Job Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 1967, Volume 51, Number 5, pages 369-381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith, P.C., Kendall, L.M., Hulin, C.C. The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement, Rand-McNally, Chicago, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Tucker, M.F., Cline, V.B., and Schmidt, J.R., Prediction of Creativity and Other Performance Measures from Biographical Information Among Pharmaceutical Scientists, Journal of iApplied Psychology, 1967, Volume 51, Number 2, pages 131-158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An update measure of supervisor-rated job performance for programmer/analysis

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Conferences
                SIGCPR '88: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR conference on Management of information systems personnel
                May 1988
                216 pages
                ISBN:0897912624
                DOI:10.1145/57216
                • Chairman:
                • E. M. Awad

                Copyright © 1988 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 May 1988

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • Article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate300of480submissions,63%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader