Abstract
As the World Wide Web has grown in popularity, the propriety of linking to other web sites has achieved some prominence as an important moral and legal issue. Hyperlinks represent the essence of Web-based activity, since they facilitate navigation in a unique and efficient fashion. But the pervasive activity of linking has generated notable controversies. While most sites welcome and support incoming links, others block them or seek to license them in some way. Particularly problematic are so-called 'deep links,' which bypass the home page along with the extensive advertising and promotional material that is usually found there. While some contend that a site's mere presence on the web is implicit permission for virtually any form of linking, others argue that at least in some circumstances deep linking is unfair and constitutes misappropriation of intellectual property.In this paper we will explore the issue of deep linking from a distinctly moral vantage point. While legal scholars have vigorously debated this issue, it has received little attention from moralists. But deep linking raises a plethora of complex property issues with subtle moral implications, and hence it deserves our careful scrutiny. The most fundamental question concerns the appropriate scope of property rights for a web site and how those rights can be properly balanced against the common good of free and open communications on the Web. It is our contention that there is no presumptive claim to the liberty of deep linking at will, since it may be disrespectful of property rights in certain situations. In order to defend this position we first make the case that a web site is a form of intellectual property, drawing support from the major theories that justify property ownership. Once we have established that a web site is really property, we consider the specific rights implied by such ownership. We conclude that on the basis of those rights, a prima facie case can be made that because of the potential for negative effects, users should not presume that deep linking is acceptable unless they first seek out the permission of the target web site.We also fully appreciate the dangers inherent in propertizing the web and the need to encourage the most flexible forms of linking. Therefore, we argue that any arbitrary or unnecessary restrictions against deep linking should be eschewed for the sake of the common good of open communications, flexibility, and maximum porosity in the Internet environment. While web site authors may indeed have a property right in their creative work they have a correlative obligation to promote the sharing and free flow of information when their specific ownership rights are not put in jeopardy by deep linking.
- Becker, L. (1977) Property rights: philosophic foundations. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
- Fisher, W. (1998) Property and contract on the internet. http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/ipcoop/98fish.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Hardy, T. (1996) The ancient doctrine of trespass to web sites. Journal of Online Law, art. 7.Google Scholar
- Honore, A.M. (1961) Ownership, in Oxford essays in jurisprudence, (ed. A.G. Guest), 107-147, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Hughes, J. (1997) The philosophy of intellectual property, in Intellectual property, (ed. A. Moore), 107-177, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
- Jakab, P. (1997) Facts and law of web linking. Twelfth Annual Computer Law Institute, State Bar of Georgia.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, C. (1997) Editors feud over whether linking is stealing. Cyber Law Journal, November 27.Google Scholar
- Kaplan, C. (1999) Is linking always legal? The experts aren't sure. Cyber Law Journal, August 6.Google Scholar
- McFarland, M. (1999) Intellectual property, information, and the common good. Proceedings, Fourth Annual Ethics and Technology Conference, Boston College, 88-95Google Scholar
- Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, state and utopia. Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
- Radin, J. (1982) Property and personhood. Stanford Law Review, 34, 957.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reeve, A. (1986) Property. Humanities Press, Atlantic Heights, NJ.Google Scholar
- Tedeschi, B. (1999) Ticketmaster and Microsoft settle suit on internet linking. The New York Times, February 15.Google Scholar
- Wagner, M. (1997) Suits attack web fundamentals. Computerworld, May 5, 125.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Ethical responsibilities: the smart card engineer
ETHICS '14: Proceedings of the IEEE 2014 International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and TechnologyAlbert Einstein in one of his philosophical notes stated: "I do not believe in immortality of the individual, and I consider ethics to be an exclusively human concern with no superhuman authority behind it". Arguably, ethics does not necessarily mean ...
Ethical disobedience
The heated rhetoric surrounding digital copyright in general, and peer-to-peer file sharing in particular, has inspired great confusion about what the copyright law does and does not prohibit. Most of the key legal questions are still unsettled, in part ...
Web site metadata
The currently established formats for how a Web site can publish metadata about a site's pages, the robots.txt file and sitemaps, focus on how to provide information to crawlers about where to not go and where to go on a site. This is sufficient as ...
Comments