ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Deciding validity in a spatial logic for trees
Full text pdf formatPdf (322 KB)
Source Types In Languages Design And Implementation archive
Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGPLAN international workshop on Types in languages design and implementation table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
SESSION: Type-based analysis table of contents
Pages: 62 - 73  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-649-8
Also published in ...
Authors
Cristiano Calcagno  University of London
Luca Cardelli  Microsoft Research
Andrew D. Gordon  Microsoft Research
Sponsors
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 9
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/604174.604183
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

(MATH) We consider a propositional spatial logic for finite trees. The logic includes A ???? Par B (tree composition), A ???? B (the implication induced by composition), and O (the unit of composition). We show that the satisfaction and validity problems are equivalent, and decidable. The crux of the argument is devising a finite enumeration of trees to consider when deciding whether a spatial implication is satisfied. We introduce a sequent calculus for the logic, and show it to be sound and complete with respect to an interpretation in terms of satisfaction. Finally, we describe a complete proof procedure for the sequent calculus. We envisage applications in the area of logic-based type systems for semistructured data. We describe a small programming language based on this idea.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Extensible markup language. http://www.w3.org/XML/.
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
C. Calcagno, L. Cardelli, and A. D. Gordon. Deciding validity in a spatial logic for trees. Technical Report MSR--TR--2002--113, Microsoft Research, 2002.
 
7
 
8
 
9
10
 
11
L. Cardelli and A. D. Gordon. Logical properties of name restriction. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications (TLCA'01), volume 2044 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 46--60. Springer, 2001.
 
12
 
13
 
14
E. Cohen. Validity and model checking for logics of finite multisets. Draft, Microsoft Research, 2002.
 
15
 
16
17
18
 
19
P. Lincoln, J. Mitchell, A. Scedrov, and N. Shankar. Decision problems for propositional linear logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, 56:239--311, 1992.
 
20
D. Lugiez and S. Dal Zilio. Multitrees automata, Presburger's constraints and tree logics. Laboratoire d'Informatique Fondamentale, CNRS and Université de Provence, 2002.
 
21
 
22
 
23
A. Urquhart. The undecidability of entailment and relevant implication. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 45:1059--1073, 1984.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Cristiano Calcagno: colleagues
Luca Cardelli: colleagues
Andrew D. Gordon: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: