skip to main content
10.1145/611817.611846acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfpgaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

An FPGA architecture with enhanced datapath functionality

Published:23 February 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Although FPGAs are a cost-efficient alternative for both ASICs and general purpose processors, they still result in designs which are more than an order of magnitude more costly and slower than their equivalents implemented in dedicated logic. This efficiency gap makes FPGAs less suitable for high-volume cost-sensitive applications (e.g. embedded systems).We show that the intrinsic cost of traditional general-purpose FPGAs can be reduced if they are designed to target an application domain or a class of applications only. We propose a method of the application-domain characterization and apply it to characterize DSP. A novel FPGA logic block architecture derived based on such an analysis, and which exploits properties of target applications, is presented. Its key feature is the 'mixed-level granularity' being a trade-off between fine and coarse granularity required for the implementation of datapath and random logic functions, respectively. This leads to a factor of four improvement in the LUT memory size compared to commercial FPGAs, and, assuming a standard-cell implementation, a 1.6-2.8 lower datapath mapping cost. A modified mixed-grain architecture with the ALU-like functionality reduces the LUT memory size by a factor of 16 compared to commercial FPGAs, and mapped onto standard cells has a 1.9-3.3 times higher datapath mapping efficiency. For these reasons, the proposed FPGA architectures may be an interesting alternative to the traditional general-purpose FPGA devices, especially if characteristics of a target application domain are known a priority.

References

  1. M. Agarwala and P. Balsara. An architecture for a DSP Field-Programmable Gate Array. IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, 3(1):136--141, March 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Altera. FLEX 10KE Programmable Logic Device Family. Data sheet. Altera, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Altera. Stratix Programmable Logic Device Family. Data sheet. Altera, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Atmel. 5K-50K Gate FPGA with DSP Optimized Core Cell and Distributed FreeRAM. Summary. Atmel, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. F. Benschop. Symmetric logic synthesis with phase assignment. In Proc. of the 22nd Symposium on Information and Communication Theory, pp. 115--122. WIC, March 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Cherepacha and D. Lewis. DP-FPGA: An FPGA architecture optimized for datapaths. VLSI Design, 4(4):329--343, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. K. Compton and S. Hauck. Totem: Custom reconfigurable array generation. In Proc. of IEEE Symposium on FPGAs for Custom Computing Machines. IEEE, April 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. DeHon. Reconfigurable Architectures for General-Purpose Computing, AI Technical Report 1586, MIT Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. MIT, 545 Technology Sq., Cambridge, MA 02139, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. V. George. Low Energy Field-Programmable Gate Array, Ph.D. Thesis. University of California, Berkeley, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. J. He and J. Rose. Advantages of heterogeneous logic block architectures for FPGAs. In Proc. of IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference. IEEE, May 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Hill and N.-S. Woo. The benefits of flexibility in look-up table-based FPGAs. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 12(2):349--353, February 1993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Kaviani, D. Vranesic, and S. Brown. Computational Field Programmable Architecture. In Proc. of IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 261--264. IEEE, May 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. K. Leijten-Nowak, A. Katoch. Architecture and implementation of an embedded reconfigurable logic core in CMOS 0.13 μm. In Proc. of 15th IEEE ASIC/SOC Conference. IEEE, September 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. K. Leijten-Nowak and J. L. van Meerbergen. Applying the adder inverting property in the design of cost-efficient reconfigurable logic. In Proc. of 44th IEEE Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems. IEEE, August 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. K. Leijten-Nowak and J. L. van Meerbergen. Embedded reconfigurable logic core for DSP applications. In Proc. of Field-Programmable Logic and Applications Conference, pp. 89--101, September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Marshall, T. Stansfield, I. Kostarnov, J. Vuillemin, B. Hutchings. A Reconfigurable Arithmetic Array for multimedia applications. In Proc. of ACM Symposium on FPGAs, February 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. D. Michelli. Synthesis and Optmization of Digital Circuits. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. N. Miller and S. Quigley. A novel Field Programmable Gate Array architecture for high speed processing. In Proc. of Field-Programmable Logic and Applications Conference, pp. 386--390, September 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. J. R. K. C. G. P.-M. Paul~Chow, Soon Ong~Seo and I. Raharadja. The design of an SRAM-based Field-Programmable Gate Array. Part II: Circuit design and layout. IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, 7(3):101--110, September 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. J. Rabaey. Digital Integrated Circuits. A Design Perspective. Prentice Hall, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. J. Rose, R. Francis, P. Chow, and D. Lewis. The effect of logic block complexity on area of programmable gate arrays. In Proc. of IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 5.3.1--5.3.5, May 1989.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. J. R. Z. V. S.D. Brown, R.J. Francis. Field-Programmable Gate Arrays. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. T. Stansfield. Wordlength as an architectural parameter for reconfigurable computing devices. In Proc. of Field-Programmable Logic and Applications Conference, pp. 667--676, September 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. A. Telikapalli. Virtex-II Pro FPGAs: The platform for programmable systems has arrived. Xcell journal, 1(42):10--13, Spring 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Xilinx. XC4000E and XC4000X Series Field Programmable Gate Arrays. Data sheet. Xilinx, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Xilinx. Virtex 2.5V Field Programmable Gate Arrays. Data sheet. Xilinx, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Xilinx. Virtex-II Pro Platform FPGAs. Data sheet. Xilinx, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. R. Zimmermann. Lecture Notes on Computer Arithmetic: Principles, Architectures, and VLSI Design. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Integrated Systems Laboratory, Zurich, Switzerland, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An FPGA architecture with enhanced datapath functionality

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            FPGA '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM/SIGDA eleventh international symposium on Field programmable gate arrays
            February 2003
            256 pages
            ISBN:158113651X
            DOI:10.1145/611817

            Copyright © 2003 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 February 2003

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate125of627submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader